- Wed May 28, 2014 5:45 pm
#41022
A 2010 Obama directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.There you have it my friends, Hitler did the same exact thing. Obama plans to use force against those who fail to fall in line, if local, State and Federal Law Enforcement decline to use force against Americans, Obama has given himself the authority to use the military to do so. Now it's also clear why Obama has been pushing to take weapons away from Americans while heavily arming those agencies he controls.
The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”
“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.
“In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances”
A second use of the military force against Americans is justified when federal, state and local authorities “decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions as deemed appropriate by the President or his representatives.”
