[elklindo69]

WASHINGTON – Steve Bannon, former President Donald Trump’s political strategist, was indicted by a federal grand jury Friday on two charges of criminal contempt for defying a House subpoena seeking documents and testimony as part of an escalating congressional inquiry into the Jan. 6 attack.

The Justice Department's decision to pursue the flamboyant Trump stalwart came three weeks after the House referred the case to federal prosecutors following Bannon's repeated refusal to cooperate with a special House committee's inquiry.

I'm wondering if we can all go around and ignore subpoenas, or is that just some privilege reserved for traitors and insurrectionists who think they are above the law?

On a side note....do you know who is not being arraigned right now?

Drum roll please................

THE EMAIL LADY!!!!

[sillydaddy]

Ahhh...those liberals , how soon they forget...

"...
Sept. 13, 2016 7:09 pm ET

The Clinton entourage is known for their faulty memories under oath, but Bryan Pagliano is setting a new standard. The former Clinton aide chose Tuesday to ignore a congressional subpoena. .."

[Clownkicker]

Wow, I never thought I would see it. sillydummy is here supporting the behaviors of the Clinton Administration.

Amazing.

Next thing you know, johnforbes will be here vociferously supporting Bryan Pagliano's behavior too.

[johnforbes]

Something like the first time since 1954 that anybody has been charged for that.

Not even Eric Holder, who was found in contempt of Congress.

[Clownkicker]

"Something like the first time since 1954 that anybody has been charged for that."-johnflubs

So what?

Are you actually suggesting that the Justice Department shouldn't enforce the law just because is wasn't enforced in the past?

More partisan hypocrisy from our resident conservative 'law and order' contemptuous-officer-of-the-court hypocrite.

[sillydaddy]

The question, of course, is, does Clown look the other way when the Democrats violate the law...?
He will never give a straight answer....

[Clownkicker]

"The question, of course, is, does Clown look the other way when the Democrats violate the law...?"-sillydummy

Of course I don't "look the other way when Democrats violate the law" dummy.

"He will never give a straight answer.... "-sillyliar

There, I just gave you a straight answer, silly.

Now the question, of course, is does silly condemn or condone REPUBLICANS who violate the law? Let's see him give a straight answer regarding Bannon's clear contempt of Congress.

I believe he will never give a straight answer to this question.....

[sillydaddy]

I believe it matters not if its a Republican or Democrat,
if they violate the law, they should pay the penalty...

[Clownkicker]

Glad to see you support indicting Bannon for criminal contempt of Congress, silly.

Kudos

[johnforbes]

Clown is not straight.

Nor can he give a straight answer.

Nor is he George Strait -- a college grad, veteran, and cowboy.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes is not smart.

Nor can he give a smart answer.

Nor is he Maxwell Smart -- a far more intelligent character.

[johnforbes]

Clowntoker is not Agent 66.

Nor would Agent 66 do 69 with Clown.

Clown is at sixes and sevens.

[Clownkicker]

"johnforbes is not smart."-me

"His Lordship is not Agent 66."-johnflubs

Nobody is "Agent 66", dummy, so that isn't exactly a zinger. Smart's designation is 86. 99's is 99. Because your attempt at humor has no relation to the joke's premise, your failure rates a zero.

As I said, johnforbes is not smart.

QED

[johnforbes]

Agent 66 (Elaine Hendrix) – Zack's partner.

Clown -- at this point thoroughly humiliated by his ignorance -- will apologize.

[Clownkicker]

Wow, you're clearly even dumber than I thought, johnny.

[johnforbes]

Clowntoker doesn't know Maxwell Smart.

Nor is Clown smart.

Nor is Clown -- sporting a pastel leisure suit -- smartly dressed.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes is not smart.

Nor can he give a smart answer.

Nor is he Maxwell Smart -- a far more intelligent character.


^^^^^^johnny is so dumb he has lived down to every declaration in that post.

[johnforbes]

I've always been independent of Clown's declarations

[Clownkicker]

And I've always been spot on with my declarations about johnforbes.

[johnforbes]

My reputation is spotless, but Clown's ability to discern has been spotty.