Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#76728
Today, Sept 7th, when Hillary AGAIN mentioned there were no markings on classified material as if that let her off the hook.

This was on the "Commander in Chief Forum."

The statute merely requires the material be injurious to national defense if disclosed, as Yale-educated lawyer Hillary well knows.

How come NOBODY at NBC News challenged her on this newest lie?
By Clownkicker
#76747
Gee, I fully expected Loser Boy Insipid to be here chastising johnforbes for his "silly ass word games".

Insipid? Are you still breathing? Should we call 911 for you?
I can't imagine what would be stopping Insipid besides a serious illness.... :o
User avatar
By RealJustme
#76751
Matt Lauer threw soft balls for Hillary and she missed them all, he assumed she certainly would have prepared answers for her emails and wanted to put the subject to bed, but Hillary stroke out, when she lied about none of the documents had any classification markers on them, Matt kind of looked at her wide eyed, but didn't dare confront her with the FBI's finding that they did, he hurried to another question.

Trump is going to eat her up during the debates.
By Clownkicker
#76753
Tool, you need to actually WATCH the interview before you tell lies like that.

Lauer hit her with real questions, just as the audience did.
Lauer pulled no punches on either candidate.
By johnforbes
#76767
Today, Sept 7th, when Hillary AGAIN mentioned there were no markings on classified material as if that let her off the hook.

This was on the "Commander in Chief Forum."

The statute merely requires the material be injurious to national defense if disclosed, as Yale-educated lawyer Hillary well knows.

How come NOBODY at NBC News challenged her on this newest lie?
User avatar
By RealJustme
#76772
Lauer hit her with real questions
Bullshit, he spent more than a third of their time asking Hillary the "same" questions her and her lawyers have consulted on, he knew she already had attorney approved responses prepared. Why not ask her if she was aware as Secretary of State she would be receiving classified and sensitive information then followed up with why then did you have that information sent through a private severed outside of government secure systems. There is no way in hell she could answer those two simple questions without exposing her intent. No one would accept that she wasn't aware she would be receiving and sending sensitive and classified information during her term. Matt only asked her questions she was prepared for and when she would start providing a little to much detail that might expose her he would shut her down and move on to the next expected question.

By the way, it's been exposed Huma asked Hillary if she had her ear mic, the whole thing was rigged in Clinton's favor and Trump still blew her away.
long long title how many chars? lets see 123 ok more? yes 60

We have created lots of YouTube videos just so you can achieve [...]

Another post test yes yes yes or no, maybe ni? :-/

The best flat phpBB theme around. Period. Fine craftmanship and [...]

Do you need a super MOD? Well here it is. chew on this

All you need is right here. Content tag, SEO, listing, Pizza and spaghetti [...]

Lasagna on me this time ok? I got plenty of cash

this should be fantastic. but what about links,images, bbcodes etc etc? [...]