- Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:02 am
#69696
Well, Gaddafi was an angle compared to Kim Jong concerning how he treats his own people and Kim Jong's threats are more real than Gaddafi who's missile range wouldn't even reach the next city in his own country.
Libya under Gaddafi became the most literate, longest living, most educated, highest median income country in Africa with social welfare benefits that would make the most liberal of Europeans green with envy. Under Kim Jong people are executed for making eye contact with Kim Jong and the vast majority of the population live on a starvation diet. Both were intolerant bad men but to take out Gaddafi while pampering Kim Jong is a mystery.
Soooo, why take out Gaddafi but not Kim Jong. Gaddafi was a moderate Muslim who rejected many provisions of Islamic Law including requiring women to wear burqas. He allowed them to hold offices and drive. Under Gaddafi requiring a woman to wear a Burka was a crime. Traditional Muslims called for his removal for refusing to follow Sharia Law...is this why Obama took him out?
SEOUL — North Korea claimed Sunday that it could wipe out Manhattan by sending a hydrogen bomb on a ballistic missile to the heart of New York, the latest in a string of brazen threats. Kim Jong warned that the United States will soon experience North Korea's full might.Obama and Hillary sent our military into Libya to kill Muammar Gaddafi because they claimed he was a cruel man and that America could not just stand by while he threatened America and brutalized his own citizens.
Well, Gaddafi was an angle compared to Kim Jong concerning how he treats his own people and Kim Jong's threats are more real than Gaddafi who's missile range wouldn't even reach the next city in his own country.
Libya under Gaddafi became the most literate, longest living, most educated, highest median income country in Africa with social welfare benefits that would make the most liberal of Europeans green with envy. Under Kim Jong people are executed for making eye contact with Kim Jong and the vast majority of the population live on a starvation diet. Both were intolerant bad men but to take out Gaddafi while pampering Kim Jong is a mystery.
Soooo, why take out Gaddafi but not Kim Jong. Gaddafi was a moderate Muslim who rejected many provisions of Islamic Law including requiring women to wear burqas. He allowed them to hold offices and drive. Under Gaddafi requiring a woman to wear a Burka was a crime. Traditional Muslims called for his removal for refusing to follow Sharia Law...is this why Obama took him out?
- By johnforbes
- By brandon