Political discussions about everything
By Intrepid
#68652
With the death of Antonin Scalia Obozo is furiously working his minions to find a way to appoint a replacement Justice by executive fiat (no Elkindoofus, in this case fiat isn't the car) and bypassing the Constitutional process.

The country has lost a brilliant Constitutional scholar and defender of liberty. It is doubtful, given their past track record, that our elected representatives will finally grow a pair and stand up to the Dear Leader and his socialist agenda of destroying the United States and turning it into just another third world shit hole to be administered by failures such as Himself.

We are in deep peril.
By Grog
#68659
That's what you need to do up there, JustFreedManIntrepidMe. Branch out and comment on different subjects. And try not to support "Intrepid" too much with your main nick lest you get confused again and once more burn the nick.

You're still pretty wobbly, but you might get your sea legs back in time. :lol:
By johnforbes
#68663
Because of the change Harry Reid made in Senate rules, it is now unlikely that Senate Repubs will help Obama out here.

Thus, Obama will probably just do some sort of interim appointment and spit again on the Constitution.
By Grog
#68668
Good lord, Forbes. The Repubs never have and never will help Obama out in any way, shape or form.

This one, if the GOP is as intransigent and obstructionist as usual, has the potential to blow up in their astonished faces like most everything else they attempt. Not only could it fuel their continued absence from the White House, it could also cost them the Senate.

Get a Dem controlled White and a Dem controlled Senate, the GOP will wish they had let Obama nominate someone.
By johnforbes
#68673
The term "obstructionist" is good in political terms because it suggests Saint Barry of Obama is on the True Path to enlightenment and only needs naughty Republicans to stop preventing his progress.

But, of course, that's pure nonsense.

Obama saw a powerful, captitalistic country and desired to fundamentally change it in a weak, high-tax, big-spending, multicultural mess.

And he has -- sadly -- ruined America's greatness.
By Intrepid
#68675
About what one might expect from the Two Banned Bozos of the Board. One a communist who is all in favor of the destruction of America, and the other a Canadian who's opinion doesn't mean shit.
By Grog
#68676
There you go, JustFreedManIntrepidMe.

Try not to mix your main nick and "Intrepid" on the same thread.

That's where you ran into trouble last time.

You can have "them" interact once in a while, but try to minimize it.


We're gonna get you through this, buddy. :lol:
By sillydaddy
#68679
Get a Dem controlled White and a Dem controlled Senate, the GOP will wish they had let Obama nominate someone.
Except for a few things......the people are tired of Obama wiping his ass with the Constitution.....

Hillary is Obama....with tits....

and Bernie will never get a nigger to vote for him..... :lol:
By Intrepid
#68681
Don't stop believing Dickie. You thinking you have it all figured out and me knowing I have you wrapped around the axle is almost as good as back in the day when you were making a fool out of yourself chasing what you will never have, a hot shiksa.
Remember when you also thought I was Forbes? That was a real knee slapper too.

I have a vague memory of this Al Bundy you keep mentioning but nothing clear. Tell me, did he also manage to cause you to look as stupid as I am able to do? Or did you think he was getting more attention from Tori, and that's what pissed you off?

So many own your punk bitch maple syrup dripping kosher ass we need a score card to keep up.
By Grog
#68683
No, I don't believe I've thought you were Forbes, JustFreedManIntrepidMe. You may tell others that if you wish, but it didn't happen. Besides, Forbes has a very distinctive style that even you couldn't mimic.

"Al Bundy" was your very first nick, JustFreedManIntrepidMe. I'm sure I'm not the only one that remembers that. You used that for a while and then you started the serial multinicking, Freedman was the first one you burned when you got excited about something one day and posted under the wrong name.

What name would you like everyone to think you used in the old days? Like I said, I still talk to Tori and I'll ask her if she has any recollection of you. :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#68690
Yes I was Al Bundy, that was with the old political board, in fact when I came back as Realjustme under this new political board, I told everyone my old Nic was Al Bundy. I was bitch slapping libtards under Al Bundy before the term libards was the proper term for loony liberals.
By Grog
#68691
Be careful, JustFreedManIntrepidMe. lol

You slipped up a little by jumping in on this thread as JustFreedManIntrepidMe.

If you're not careful, you could once again forget which name you're logged in with. We wouldn't want that to happen again, would we? :lol:
By Intrepid
#68698
I've told you Grog/Malcolm, I never had any interaction with the queen of beer farts and anal sex. It was too much fun and in reality, beneath me to engage in the hopeless chase you and your buddies ran (she was laughing at your pathetic antics the whole time. You realize that now, don't you?).
And yes, you did think I was Forbes for some time, but it's not surprising you don't remember. The Molson takes its toll.
But don't stop believing.
By Grog
#68700
Kudos on keeping yours nicks straight so far, "Intrepid."

Now, I know JustFreedManIntrepidMe is gonna want to go back on the high wire, as it were, and have JustFreedManIntrepidMe interact with "Intrepid." Just stay calm when you do and double, maybe even triple check to see which name you're logged in with BEFORE you get in a dialogue with yourself. :lol:

I'll play along again. Okay, "Intrepid" you might not have had any interaction with Tori, but did you have a name besides "Al Bundy" that you posted with back then?
By elklindo69
#68703
johnforbes wrote:Because of the change Harry Reid made in Senate rules, it is now unlikely that Senate Repubs will help Obama out here.

Thus, Obama will probably just do some sort of interim appointment and spit again on the Constitution.
So Forbes just opened up another can of stupid. WTF is going on here? That statement is asininity on steroids.

The constitution requires for the president to nominate a SC justice and now Forbestardo is now claiming that Obama is spitting on the constitution by doing his job.

:lol:
By johnforbes
#68704
Little Mr Elkin, what I've opened up is an opportunity for you to do some research.

Reid destroyed comity by changing rules, old rules, which had stood the test of time in bipartisan manner.

Reid was shortsighted, and drenched in ideological hatred.

But then Democrats are often so.
By Grog
#68769
Sounds like Forbes is chirping again.


Anyone else noticed that JustFreedManIntrepidMe is oddly absent? And so is "Intrepid." I'm sure it's just a coincidence. :lol:
By Intrepid
#68776
Stay the course Grog/Malcolm, don't stop believing.

Never mind that some of us actually have lives away from a computer.
And others of us can only have interaction with fantasy women on the Internet.
(Who fart beer and love it up the ass, two things you will never experience, from a woman anyway).
And couldn't get laid in a whore house with hundred dollar bills (U.S.) sticking out of all his pockets.
You are one of those sad little geeks who can't get noticed by women no matter what you do, right?
You remind me of that Jew geek Howard on The Big Bang Theory.
No game with women, no game at all.
You get your tiny little Jew dick hard by pissing people off, don't you?
Only trouble is, this time it's YOU who are getting pissed off, right yid?
Right Christ killer?
Right oven stuffer?
I own your punk bitch kosher maple syrup drizzling well used ass, and I'm willing to sell cheap.

Go fuck your mother Hebe, she loves it up the ass too (it's a slam dunk you won't ever fuck a hot shiksa).

Tell me, which crushes your soul most Grog/Malcolm?
The hot Shiksas who ignore your advances or,
The hot Shiksas who laugh at you or,
The hot Shiksas who look at you with pity in their eyes?

Oy Vey!

Want more kike? Bring it.
I bring the pain.
And I do it so fucking well.
By Grog
#68777
There we go. And especially vehement tonight. I knew I could draw you out. lol

Just be careful you don't post with JustFreedManIntrepidMe in the middle of the night. It might look suspicious if "both" of you return at the same time. :lol:


What name, besides "Al Bundy" might Tori the shiksa have known you under back in the old days?
By Clownkicker
#68778
"Want more kike?"-StupidFuck

Gee, who doesn't want more kike? :lol: Moron...


"I bring the pain."-I'mStupid

Well, at least he's intelligent enough to realize stupidity is pain.

I guess that's what he meant when he previously called himself "PainfulTruth".

He actually bragged about the truth of his stupidity back then and continues the tradition today as "I'mStupid".
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now let's watch Insipid dance and spew on command.
Sure, it's 'painful' to watch such a pathetic dunce obey, but he has nothing else to offer but his submission to his superiors, I'm afraid.
By Grog
#68792
What is this, day three or four of the JustFreedManIntrepidMe watch? What has happened to our most prolific poster that he can only briefly decloak as "Intrepid?"
By Intrepid
#68809
More silly ass word games (and the essential emoticons that take the place of reason, logic and facts in his posts) from the queen of silly ass word games.

Stay the course Grog, don't stop believing. Is the leash around your neck comfortable, or should I give it another good yank?

And thanks to both of the banned bozos of the political board for bumping my thread.
By snakeoil
#68810
http://www.answers.com/Q/What_qualifica ... rt_justice" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Technically there are no qualifications to be on the Supreme Court. Congress would never allow an unqualified person to be approved though. Those who have never graduated from law school have served on the Court in the past.
Those who were commissioned before the mid- to late-19th century learned the law by studying and apprenticing with more experienced attorneys; states didn't mandate licensing until the 20th-century.

Of the 112 Supreme Court members, only 47 have held degrees from accredited law schools; 18 attended law school, but never attained a degree; and 47 were self-taught and/or went through an apprenticeship.

The first Justice to graduate from law school was Benjamin Robbins Curtis, Harvard class of 1832, appointed to the bench in 1851.

The last sitting Justice without a formal law degree was Stanley Forman Reed, who served from 1938-1957.

Today, nominees are judged by the quality of the law school attended and the extent of their experience on the bench. Twenty-three of the 47 degreed candidates graduated from Harvard or Yale, while a number of the remainder graduated from other T14 (Top 14) schools.

On the current Court, six Justices went to Harvard, two to Yale, and one to Columbia.

Credentials have become so important over the last 50 years that, when Richard Nixon named Mildred Lillie and Hershel Friday as potential nominees for the Court in 1971, the American Bar Association objected on the grounds that they were unqualified for the position, and their names were withdrawn from the pool. The ABA also objected to President George W. Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers, his personal attorney and White House counsel, to the bench in 2005.

Public service and political connections also factor heavily into the nomination process. For example, all but one appointee, George Shiras, Jr. (served 1892-1903), has held public office or been a judge prior to nomination, and three-fifths of the nominees have been personal acquaintances of the President who nominated them.

While the Constitution stipulates no minimum or maximum age for judicial service, most nominees are under the age of 60, to help ensure a long tenure on the court. Most are in their 40s or 50s when appointed. The youngest Justice ever seated was Joseph Story, at the age of 32, in 1812; the oldest at time of appointment was Charles Evan Hughes, who was 67, in 1930.

Most of the 112 Supreme Court members have been white, male, Protestants. The first Jewish Justice was Louis Brandeis, commissioned in 1916; the first of only two African-Americans was Thurgood Marshall, commissioned in 1967 (the second being Clarence Thomas, who replaced Marshall); the first of four females was Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, commissioned in 1981, and retired in 2006. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justice Elena Kagan are currently serving. In addition to being the only the third of four women appointed to the Court, Sonia Sotomayor is also the first Latina commissioned. There are currently no Protestants serving on the Supreme Court.
By Clownkicker
#68811
I would like to offer a congratulatory "good boy" to Insipid for bringing the stupid on command once again.

I especially like the part where he desperately tries to ridicule emoticons when he regularly uses pink and red type in his posts like a 13-year-old girl.
I bet he would dot his "i"s with little hearts too, if it were an available option for him, right Pinky Boy Loser? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now dance for us again, dimwit.
By Intrepid
#68813
Fail.
By the failed failure, nay, the ne plus ultra of all failures, the epitome of all fails, the veritable Mt. Everist of fail, the junkie pothead Marxist, AssClown Loser Lucky.

Now to serious matters.
B. Hussain Obozo has chosen not to attend the funeral of Antonin Scalia. Obozo knows Scalia, even in his current state has a higher IQ and is better qualified on Constitutional matters than the Dear Leader and would suffer by proximity to the revered jurist.
So maybe he can get in a quick 18 holes.
By Grog
#68815
Hmmmm. This is something of a minor, very minor conundrum.

Why is JustFreedManIntrepidMe only posting with "Interpid?"

Or, is it possible "JustFreedManIntrepidMe" is a sock of "Intrepid" and not the other way around?


Discuss.
By Intrepid
#68818
Keep digging Dickie. But the important thing is, don't stop believing. Some call it chasing their tail, but I'm not one of those who think Jews have tails. Some do, but not me.

It would be nice if AssClown Loser Lucky could come up with his own style, but in the mean time I'll enjoy knowing he realizes I am superior and that he mimics me in tribute.

Winning.
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

#