Open Discussions about the VoyeurWeb.com site
By Hex
#1497
I have read a bunch of the comments from people who feel mislead by VW because "Igor" wasn't the site owner and more than one person may have played the role of "Igor."

I am pretty surprised by these comments. VW is a for profit company. They have employees that screen photos and comment on them. Of course they have more than one screener and of course more than one person could go by a single handle, "Igor."

This just like there is no Victoria who owns "Victoria's Secret"
There was never a guy named "Arby"
Roy Roger's never owned Roy Roger's Restaurant
And, Del Taco isn't owned by a guy named Del, it was start by two guys named Ed Hackbarth and David Jameson and they weren't even Mexican.

Also, for the guy who mentioned that "Katherine" is the PR person for a Corporation and therefore would never show her tits because she represents a corporation blah blah blah, most small businesses are corporations. Being a corp has nothing to do with the size of the business, being a corporation is for legal and tax purposes. She could certainly show her tits and nothing would happen to "the corporation." They are not a publically traded corporation, so there is not stock price to fall.

Looking forward to the site being back up!
Handling Crime in DC

So is this why Trump sent in the National Guard to[…]

Footlong Felon

Apparently the Trumped up felony charges of assaul[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]

Obliterated what?

Mr Forbes, after careful scrutiny of this thread, […]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]