[johnforbes]

"The New York Times has independently confirmed the authenticity of IRS whistleblowers' claims that allege Biden's Department of Justice interfered with the probe into Hunter Biden's taxes. In the article, NYT revealed that the IRS whistleblowers' testimony was "confirmed independently to The New York Times by a person with knowledge of the situation." The paper buried the confirmation far down in the 21st paragraph of the article."

In other news, Clowntroller blew many a whistle during his deviant decade in the tempestuous tearooms of Frisco.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, if Garland lied under oath, he should be held responsible.

You must remember that "We still have no smoking gun proving that it was Garland who gave the order to block Weiss from charging Hunter Biden in California, and more importantly, we still have no smoking gun proving it was the president who interfered in any way."

And that makes all the difference. One needs evidence to charge someone. Any actual lawyer knows that.

When you have some evidence, get back to us.

(A little reminder that we are still waiting on that evidence that the 2020 election was stolen through widespread election fraud, johnny. What? Nothing yet?)

[johnforbes]

Clown is correct that a suspicion that something transpired is different from having the evidence.

I'd like to believe he didn't just tell Weiss something, but in recent years many events have shown extreme cynicism.

For example, the laptop was almost instantly found to be genuine, but Blinken worked with Morell on the 51 intel expert letter to give disinformation to affect the election -- a stunning example of dishonesty.