[johnforbes]

Her platform was hardly "fascist," but it was country and family.

Thoughts on making Italy great again?

[Clownkicker]

"Thoughts on making Italy great again?"-johnfoibles

No, sadly, johnforbes has contributed no thoughts whatsoever on making Italy fascist again.


"Her platform was hardly "fascist," but it was country and family."-Dishonestjohn

In other words, it was exactly what Mussolini ran on.


Stop playing the gullible apologist for fascists, johnny. Didn't you learn anything from your misplaced support of Trump?

[brandon]

What was wrong with what she said?

[Clownkicker]

What was wrong with what Mussolini said in 1922?

[johnforbes]

Mussolini was Mussolini.

Other people are not him.

She favors God, family, and country, and that is a profoundly pro-Italian position to take.

Even by the lazy standards of the Left, calling other people "Mussolini" or "Hitler" is just dumb.

[Clownkicker]

No one said she was Mussolini, dumbfuck. Why must you always make up stupid shit in order to post here?

What she IS is a member of the same political party as Mussolini. It believes in authoritarianism, nationalism (including racial nationalism), hierarchy and elitism, and militarism.

To johnforbes, that is simply a reflection of his own Republican Party belief system.

But to be clear lest johnforbes shit himself, I'm not calling johnforbes "Mussolini" either. What I'm saying is that johnforbes would undoubtedly vote enthusiastically for Mussolini if he were running for office today on the same platform he ran on in 1922.

johnny's not called "conservative" fer nothin. His stale political philosophy is 100 years old.

[johnforbes]

Hitler existed, and was an evil dictator.

Clowntroller also exists.

They are different people, and intelligent people assess them differently.

Attempting to tarnish the collective wisdom of Italian voters, as Clown sought to do, is disgraceful.