[johnforbes]

"Over the weekend, Dr. Richard Ebright of Rutgers University laid out what I can only describe as a damning chronology of circumstantial evidence supporting the case for Covid-19 emerging from a lab in Wuhan, instead of via natural origins.

Dr. Richard Ebright is the Board of Governors Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology. Ebright received an A.B. summa cum laude in biology from Harvard University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Microbiology and Molecular Genetics from Harvard University "

[Clownkicker]

If only johnforbes would follow the science for once in his useless life, he wouldn't be dragged around by the ring in his nose.

johnny is too stupid to understand that there is no science in his referenced article. At most there is a hypothesis without any scientific trials of the hypothesis, which means it is nothing more than some guy's untested opinion. That's what a hypothesis is.

I previously gave johnforbes scientific articles about the genetic mutations trail of the virus, plus two sites in the Wuhan market that tested positive for two strains of the virus a month apart. But johnforbes doesn't care about evidence to support his opinions. He just knows he has an opinion which is based on nothing but speculation. He only cares about promoting his partisan narrative which is targeted at the least intelligent among us.

[johnforbes]

I would take seriously two locations in that Wuhan market, but logically speaking they would be far more likely to be destinations.

It was always absurd to ignore the most likely location in the world -- a high-level lab partly funded by the US, with grants to Daszak's Eco-Alliance, which directed funds to the bat lady in Wuhan.

Ignoring that would be akin to not mentioning the elephant in the room, or Hillary's tent-like attire, or the gender of Serena..

[Clownkicker]

"Ignoring that would be akin to not mentioning the elephant in the room, or Hillary's tent-like attire, or the gender of Serena.."-johnflubs

It is refreshing to see johnforbes refer to his lab leak hypothesis as being as unscientific and irrelevant as Hillary's clothes and Serena's gender.

It's not often he admits his posts are unscientific and irrelevant, but today is a red letter day, I guess, where the blinding light of the truth overcomes johnny's silly partisan propaganda.

[johnforbes]

Thanks to Clowntroller for graciously acknowledging that reading even one of my posts is refreshing.

Indeed, on a sultry September day such as this, my postings are almost as refreshing as a tall cool glass of bleach.

By the way, I have emailed Clown the data he had sought at his email address: leftist_wimp@limpwrist. com