- Sat Aug 27, 2022 7:31 am
#134975
To have the Sup Ct weigh in on this, and that will probably happen in due course as a consequence of the raid
In Navy v Egan (1988):
"The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."
Surely Joe, now embarked upon his third recent vacation, takes material with him to work on?
Set aside the Left's raging hatred of Trump, and there are still interesting pragmatic and constitutional questions here.
In Navy v Egan (1988):
"The President, after all, is the ‘Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States’" according to Article II of the Constitution, the court’s majority wrote. "His authority to classify and control access to information bearing on national security ... flows primarily from this constitutional investment of power in the President, and exists quite apart from any explicit congressional grant."
Surely Joe, now embarked upon his third recent vacation, takes material with him to work on?
Set aside the Left's raging hatred of Trump, and there are still interesting pragmatic and constitutional questions here.
- By Clownkicker