Political discussions about everything
#133972
Day after day, evidence flows in from the key swing states of 2020, which all violated their election rules.

Newly uncovered records documenting the Maricopa County 2020 election show that while over 20,000 ballots were transported from the #USPS after Election Day, the county only rejected 934 late ballots. Yes, that was more than the margin of "victory" for Joe.

Maricopa County alone admitted that they sent 110,000 mail-in or absentee ballots to what turned out to be the wrong addresses

Clark County had 90,000 mail-in ballots that are unaccounted for. The margin of victory in the entire state was only a little over 33,000 ballots.

As the NY Times concluded in 2020, mail ballots are a recipe for fraud.
#133980
I agree with the NY Times, which underscored the potential of mail ballots to result in fraud in its 2020 reports.

Day after day, evidence flows in from the key swing states of 2020, which all violated their election rules.

Newly uncovered records documenting the Maricopa County 2020 election show that while over 20,000 ballots were transported from the #USPS after Election Day, the county only rejected 934 late ballots. Yes, that was more than the margin of "victory" for Joe.

Maricopa County alone admitted that they sent 110,000 mail-in or absentee ballots to what turned out to be the wrong addresses

Clark County had 90,000 mail-in ballots that are unaccounted for. The margin of victory in the entire state was only a little over 33,000 ballots.
#133995
"Well, there was never a thorough audit of Arizona,..."-johnfibs

johnny, Republicans spent six months on their partisan audit. How much more "thorough" do you expect any audit to get than to be looking for partisan fraud in the vote count and not finding any by the other party? You're making yourself look even more foolish every time you regurgitate this silly Trumpist/Republican trope.


"Clark County had 90,000 mail-in ballots that are unaccounted for."-johnflubs

So the ballots weren't voted and counted. That's good, dummy. If they were voted and counted, their identifying numbers would have been scanned and the ballots would be accounted for. They couldn't have affected the vote if they weren't counted. Duh...


"...and what I'd like is what most would like -- a fair election in which legal citizens vote rather than dead people or illegal aliens or people who moved to another state or ballot harvesters filling out 20 ballots."-johnfoibles

And since Republican authorities in every state couldn't find a shred of evidence that any of that stuff happened anywhere, you should be satisfied that the election was "fair"--no sign of widespread fraud anywhere. And this is according to Republican AG Barr, Cyber Ninjas, and every Republican Secretary of State who certified their elections in the swing states.

Let it go already, johnny. You are destroying America with your Big Lie. No one will ever accept an election again if you keep this up. And that will be the end of our democracy. It will be on your head when the militias start shooting to set up their strong man dictator.
#134017
Clown, please start being more honest about this.

Repubs don't have full control of AZ or any of the key swing states, and full audits have not even been done in the key areas of those states.

Dems have resisted all efforts to examine the 2020 election because they liked the outcome -- senile Joe prevailed.

But the election now ranks up there with 1876, the famous "stolen election."
#134024
If that were true, Republicans should be able to come up with some evidence, any evidence at all, that the election was stolen. Only the can't. Just as YOU can't. You have never provided any evidence thqat the election was stolen but you expect people to believe you.

johnny, you're a partisan turd.

I said it so it must be true, right, johnny? I have provided just as much evidence of that being true as you have that the election was stolen. So face it, you're a partisan turd.
#134028
What johnforbes means is there wasn't a REPUBLICAN audit.

Wait a minute, there WAS a Republican audit. It took six months and cost millions of dollars, but they finally came up with the same count as the Arizona Secretary of State did.

So apparently what johnforbes means is there wasn't an audit that came up with the results HE wanted.

That's the problem with living in an alternate reality with its own alternate facts. Serious people are more concerned with the real world and real facts. Thus, the results of EVERY Republican inquiry into the election came back with the same answer: there is no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election.
#134030
I did NOT, of course, say no audit of any tiny area had not been done.

Elkin and Clown are reading-impaired, so they have not been fair or honest about this.

Repubs don't have full control of AZ or any of the key swing states, and full audits have not even been done in the key areas of those states.

Dems have resisted all efforts to examine the 2020 election because they liked the outcome -- senile Joe prevailed.

But the election now ranks up there with 1876, the famous "stolen election."
#134036
"Repubs don't have full control of AZ or any of the key swing states, and full audits have not even been done in the key areas of those states."-johnfibs

Maricopa County may not be in "full control" of Republicans but it is controlled by Republicans as Governor and Secretary of State. Regardless, a full audit WAS done by partisan toadies for Trump and they still verified the certified count.

Why are you still lying about this when you are the one who started this thread about Maricopa County which was audited in the "full control" of Trump Republicans.

For some reason you STILL refuse to accept the truth that every responsible (as well as the irresponsible Cyber Ninjas) Republican keeps trying to tell you, that there is no evidence of widespread fraud in the 2020 election.
#134066
johnforbes keeps pretending that in a state with a Republican governor and a Republican Secretary of State that Democrats can do anything to stop an audit if the Republicans want one.

THAT is complete control, johnny. They can run an audit after any election they choose. There's nothing any Democrat can do to stop it. Yet you keep blaming Democrats for audits not being run when audits were in fact run and the results were the same as those announced initially.

I wonder if there will an audit of the Republican primary in Wisconsin where five Republican candidates failed to qualify because theirpetitions were found to be rife with phony signatures.

"Five Republican candidates for governor in Michigan — including top-tier contenders James Craig and Perry Johnson — failed to qualify for the August primary Thursday after the Board of State Canvassers rejected their nominating petitions because of alleged rampant signature fraud."-NBC news

Criminy, Republicans-- they cheat BEFORE elections as well as during elections.

That Republican hypocrisy rears its ugly head agai[…]

Trump campaigned on releasing all of the Epstein F[…]

Mr Forbes has never cited AI. In the most charmin[…]

Obliterated what?

As if Trump wasn't using unsecured private email s[…]

Well. A lot of people say a lot of things some tr[…]

I'd like to thank Mr Forbes for posting that

Hulk Hogan

Years ago, at Dulles Intl Airport, I ran into Hulk[…]