[johnforbes]

In other news, Elkin wept giving the speech he would have given had he graduated from high school.

[elklindo69]

Don't you remember how after Miss Email lady lost the presidential election, she kept droning on and on how the election was "fixed" and pretending she actually won the election and went so far as to call her home "the winter white house"?

Obviously you don't.

Because Hillary has dignity, and she's not a whiny little sore loser crybaby who just shit his diapers.

[johnforbes]

Yep, Hillary -- just like Stacy Abrams -- has been claiming she won for years.

But doesn't Stacy write erotic romantic novels?

She would be fun as a Senator.

[elklindo69]

I know one person who doesn't use a burner phone.....Hillary.

Not to mention the fact that that Trump lost another attempt to block the National Archives from turning over his White House's records to the congress for investigating the Jan 6 capitol riot. WFT is so important about those records....what is it? Some kind of national secret or something that he's trying to hide.

Hey but wait.....the emails and the server!!!!!

[johnforbes]

I often weep after reading one of Elkin's posts.

They make me feel a genuine sense of sadness for the globe considering the vast chasm of Elkin's vacuity.

[elklindo69]

I heard that Mark Meadows used a couple of private gmail accounts, an encrypted account on Signal and his personal mobile phone to conduct official government business. Which was actually some stupid attempt to conspire with certain sitting members of congress to overturn the 2020 elections

Yeah.........but wait.....all of her emails.

LOL

[Clownkicker]

Remember when johnforbes screamed for a year for election audits after Hillary won the popular vote and still 'lost' the election anyway?

No?

I don't either.

That's the difference between Democrats and Republicans. Democrats accept legally certified election results and Republicans don't accept them.

Republicans will be the death of the republic, and they're actually proud of it.

[Clownkicker]

Here are a few things that johnforbes COULD be posting about, but he would rather 'discuss' (propagandize) about Hillary reading something nobody cares about, including himself.

1. 800,000 Americans have now died of COVID, but johnforbes is still here starting threads about how we should let the convenience of children govern our COVID public health response. As a new strain of the virus puts greater stress on our overloaded health care system, johnforbes is still trying to belittle those taking rational steps to control the pandemic. He posts unsupported claims that steps recommended by epidemiologists and other medical professionals are just political moves to squelch freedom. Then we get yet another report of unmasked dimwits causing yet another outbreak somewhere because people ignored the mask mandates. This should worry johnforbes, but his hypocritical partisan propaganda is more important to him.

2. A Trump-appointed Federal judge just ruled that Trump is wrong on the law about withholding his tax returns from Congress. From Business Insider-- https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... li=BBnb7Kz johnforbes still hasn't come out and said Trump should avoid contempt charges and comply with Congress. As an officer of the court, we already know he holds the PA Supreme Court in contempt, so why would anyone be surprised that he holds Congress in contempt?

3. It is now clear that Trump knew exactly what was going on in the Capitol on Jan. 6th but said and did nothing about it anyway. He sat watching TV instead. This comes from texts from Trump's son Don Jr., Laura Ingraham of FOXnews, Sean Hannity of FOXnews, Brian Kilmeade of FOXnews, reporter Jake Sherman from inside the Capitol as it was happening, telling Meadows that there was an armed standoff at the House Chamber door, etc.. From the Bostons Globe-- https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... li=BBnb7Kz

Trump knew all this and did nothing. Meadows was pleading with Trump to stop it. This should concern johnforbes, but it doesn't.

4.The Proud Bois and Oath Keepers have been sued by Washington D.C. over the planned and coordinated violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6th. Text messages from the two groups show that they planned and coordinated their attack. It wasn't a spontaneous response to Trump's speech just before the attack. From The Guardian-- https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... tol-attack This should also concern johnforbes, but it doesn't.

There are many important things going on right now that should worry johnforbes, but all he can do is start silly propaganda threads that are completely unsupported by the facts.

Why does johnforbes hate America to this extent that he will intentionally distract from all these dangers to our Republic?

Things that make you go "Hmmmm..."

[sillydaddy]

You forgot to mention one thing, Clown.....
Biden has now all but forgotten about the Americans he left behind in Afghanistan...

[Clownkicker]

I didn't "forget" that, dummy.

Feel free to start a documented thread that proves Biden has forgotten the Americans still in Afghanistan.

I will give it its due attention.

Meanwhile, feel free to comment on any of the important topics I just listed, documented with sources...

[Clownkicker]

In your discussions, silly, be sure you include documentation of all the things Trump did to get Americans and military equipment out of Afghanistan by his May 1st deadline.

It will be your shortest post ever...

[sillydaddy]

and Biden was responsible for 13 military personnel killed after he ended the war...

[Clownkicker]

Not true, dummy.

The war wasn't over until two days later.

Try to get your facts straight...

[johnforbes]

I wouldn't have had the slightest problem with Hillary wanting audits of key states after her loss.

What I want is fair, and credible, elections.

Dems should WANT Joe to be accepted as president, to be view as clearly having won.

Audits would help Dems accomplish that assuming Joe really won.

So why do Dems run in terror away from audits?

[Clownkicker]

They don't "run from audits".

They shake their heads in sadness that Republicans continue to refuse to accept legally certified elections. And you still refuse to accept any audit done by ANYONE, even your own party, so what would be the point of more audits, dummy?


So you have nothing to say about any of those actually important topics I offered to distract you from your pointless partisan diversions, johnny?

[johnforbes]

Before reading Clowntoker's posts, I have to have a staffer fetch a giant bath towel.

This serves to absorb my tears as my clear green eyes peruse his simpering socialistic slop.

[Clownkicker]

You SHOULD be crying about the fact that you refuse to accept the results of ANY audit performed by ANYONE, even your own chosen representatives.

Meanwhile, feel free to discuss something that matters, like the four topics I suggested out of the many we could be discussing instead of your dimwitted, irrelevant, purely partisan 'topics' like this worthless thread.

[johnforbes]

Senile Joe required note cards in order to go on the show of low-IQ leftist Jimmy Fallon.

However, I do not need any note cards to point out the many and various ways in which Clowntoker is mistaken.

[Clownkicker]

Okay, johnny, prove that I am mistaken.

Tell us which of the audits in any swing state you do accept.

[johnforbes]

As far as I know, no full audit has been done in any state.

At most, partial looks at a county or two in a few states...

[Clownkicker]

But the other counties are not disputed by anyone and they couldn't have effected the election results. Why waste even more taxpayer money on audits nobody wants?

johnforbes seems unaware that audits cost money and time. The AZ audit of just one county cost Republicans $6 million and took six months to complete and you STILL refuse to accept the results there. There are over 3000 counties in the U.S.. You do the math, dummy. How much money and time do you expect us to spend for results you will still refuse to accept?
Here is a hypocritical self-described fiscal conservative demanding we waste more money on audits than we spend on elections. Go figger...

Also, you have yet to explain to us how you would devise your "nonpartisan audit" Every auditor has political opinions of their own. One would think that audits done by the losing party (such as in GA and AZ) that confirm they lost should be sufficient to appease even a dishonest hack like you, but they don't. Every full audit done would simply engender more of your idiotic whining about how you couldn't possibly have lost. Newsflash, johnny, Dewey didn't win. He was defeated by the apparently ultra-charismatic Truman.

We can't go six months without a President. Sometimes you must simply accept the election results as certified by your own party, dimwit. If you don't, there can be no democracy.

Why do you hate America, johnny? Why do you insist we should go six months without a President? Don't you think Putin and China would take advantage of that to attack our interests?

[johnforbes]

In an ideal world, everything would undergo audit, but Clown is correct that the cost would be excessive, and thus the focus would have to be on the key swing states.

But no full audit has been done in any of them either.

What they have done is look at key parts of the key swing states, and typically the most urban and densely populated county, which is where Dems stopped vote counting at 10pm Election Night and then magically "found" more votes for Dems at 3am.

[Clownkicker]

What they did is look at portions of swing states that could have affected the outcome of the election, which is what any responsible party would do to avoid wasting money on audits that wouldn't change a thing, regardless of what they found.

That's what intelligent people do. That's not what johnforbes wants to do.

What johnforbes wants to do is piss away taxpayer money in areas where there are no disputes, not even by nutjob conspiracy theorists. The relevant areas have been audited by his own people and he refuses to accept the science and refuses to accept defeat.

[johnforbes]

When I began reading Clown's posting, I was in a good mood -- bright, cheerful, and upbeat.

After reading his post, I began weeping as hard as Hillary -- tears of shock, tears of outrage, tears for fears.

[Clownkicker]

"After reading [His Lordship's] post, I began weeping as hard as Hillary -- tears of shock, tears of outrage, tears for fears."-johnfoibles

Good, dummy, you absolutely SHOULD be weeping over your willingness to waste taxpayer money on superfluous audits for your purely partisan reasons, johnny.

I'm glad I could finally get it through your thick skull.

[elklindo69]

If all of those conservatives out there are claiming Trump is innocent of inciting the January 6 insurrection.....then how come nobody will say so under oath???

I remember Trump once said: "If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?"

[johnforbes]

It is difficult for even the clear vision of Mr. Forbes to read this thread through his falling tears.

He weeps not merely for the human condition, but for the raw and aggressive stupidity of young Elkin.

And for the garish, gross gayness of the more seasoned Clowntoker.

[Clownkicker]

As always, when dishonestjohn has nothin', he resorts to endless stupidity posts caused by his chronic idiopathic infantile hypocrisy.

[johnforbes]

His tears merely were evocative of the tender sensibility of Mr. Forbes to the flaws not only of the human condition generally, but relating to the glaring, gross flaws of Mr. Clowntoker specifically.

Frohe Weihnachten!

[Clownkicker]

Yes, you absolutely SHOULD be weeping over your willingness to waste taxpayer money on superfluous audits for your purely partisan "human condition," johnny.

[johnforbes]

I am weeping.

And when those blue snowflakes start falling, and when those blue memories start calling...

[Clownkicker]

That's always the danger of realizing just how partisanly hypocritical you really are, johnny.

Sorry I had to open your eyes to it. But since your college profs obviously failed to teach you self-awareness, then SOMEONE's got to do it.

[johnforbes]

You'll be doing all right, with your racist Christmas of white,

But I'll have a blue, blue Christmassssssssssss