Political discussions about everything
#122043
In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter about "Hillary," the new Hulu documentary series on her life, Hillary Clinton bashes 2020 Democratic contender Bernie Sanders, building on what had already been a news cycle filled with bad press for Sanders in advance of the Iowa caucuses.

"He was in Congress for years," Clinton says in the interview. "He had one senator support him. Nobody likes him, nobody wants to work with him, he got nothing done. He was a career politician. It’s all just baloney and I feel so bad that people got sucked into it."

"It’s his leadership team. It’s his prominent supporters," she said. "It’s his Bernie Bros and their relentless attacks on lots of his competitors, particularly the women. And I really hope people are paying attention to that because it should be worrisome that he has permitted this culture — not only permitted, [he] seems to really be very much supporting it."
What timing, right before the Iowa caucuses, she is in lock step with Warren, the DNC and the Media in their timed attacks. I don't like Bernie but this is the second time the deep state steps in to take him out when he gets to close to winning the democrat nomination for President. I suspect it's because they know he won't play the deep state game and will do it his way.
#122046
"Told you the DNC and Media have decided once again to shred Bernie"-RealScum

Of course FOXnews, Breitbart, and other conservative media have been 'shredding' Bernie for years. Now all of a sudden RealTool thinks it's bad for media to decide to "shred" a politician.

Now he says the Democrat party machinery may be doing exactly what Republicans and their media have been doing for years, and RealTool sticks his foot in it and says that behavior is bad. What a moron. He is actually pretending a party shouldn't decide who their candidate is going to be.....unless it is the Republican party, that is.

If Republicans do it, it's good. If Democrats do it, it's bad. That's how dishonest and hypocritical conservatives are.


"Wasn't it Donna Brazile who admitted that there was a plot to exclude Bernie in 2016 as well?"-johnflubs

Bernie isn't a Democrat, dummy. The Democrats are under no compulsion to choose someone to represent them who isn't in their party.
#122048
Bernie isn't a Democrat, dummy. The Democrats are under no compulsion to choose someone to represent them who isn't in their party.
The DNC has a rule …
candidates must affirm in writing to the DNC chairman that they "are a Democrat... are a member of the Democratic Party; will accept the Democratic nomination; and will run and serve as a member of the Democratic Party."
Bernie runs as an independent for senator...but he is running for the Democratic nomination...
So he must have affirmed, in writing, to the DNC, no two ways about it..! :O
#122049
sillydummy, the Party can make any requirements for their nominee that it likes. But that doesn't mean they have to run him just because he says he will abide by the Party rules.

It's a one way street, dummy. The Party gets what it wants, the candidates gets what they are offered. If they are offered nothing, tough shit. It's just like the Republican Party whose behavior you have no problem with.
#122053
It's disturbing to see RealTool isn't at all bothered by the RNC and dark state telling him and all Republicans they have no choice at all in picking their candidate.

Republicans are expected to bend over and take what they're given by the RNC and dark state, and they will like it.

Like all conservatives, as long as he gets someone he likes, he isn't at all concerned about his rights.

But when he doesn't like the clown they cram down his throat next time, he will then bitch and moan and pretend he gives a damn about it, though he doesn't care now.
#122087
It's a shame to see johnforbes claiming that "bending over" is a gay image.

Apparently johnforbes has never tied his shoes, picked up a toddler, or picked up his dog's shit piles when he takes him for a walk.

As every intelligent person knows, there is nothing inherently "gay" about bending over. For example, when your Party wants to royally shaft you, you willingly bend over to take it, not because you're gay, but because you are a gutless pussy.
#122217
Three things, dimwit:

First, Sanders isn't trying to take on Obama, you moron.

Second, Romney isn't a Democrat.

Third, no one gives a shit that Democrats are going to pick their own ticket. Why, that's OUTRAGEOUS! Imagine a party picking it's own ticket!

Is that all you have to whine about? Your Republican party has rules that don't give Republicans any choice at all. No one is even allowed to run against Trump, whether you want him or not.
#122226
First, Sanders isn't trying to take on Obama, you moron.

Second, Romney isn't a Democrat.
Why does everything have to be grade school lever for you clown? Sanders is indeed taking on Obama, Obama and his people have chosen who will defeat Sanders. Sanders isn't running against Trump, he hasn't won the Democratic nomination, he's running against Democrats.

Romney is indeed a Democrat, far more so than he is a Republicans. Utah got suckered.
#122256
Elkin, Bolton's testimony -- whatever it is -- is meaningless, just as that of Vindman and Ciaramella the fake whistleblower.

We have the reality -- what all acknowledge is an accurate call transcript -- and Trump did nothing wrong.

The House's two articles DO NOT CONTAIN ANY CRIME EVEN ALLEGED.

Obstructing the House, even if true, is not a crime.

None of this is, and Schiff knows that very well, so he has to lie every day on TV.
#122261
Trump never even met the guy....right Justme?
You're watching to much CNN clown, Trump never said that and neither have I. Sure Trump met him, he worked with Trump, it's not like they were glued together though, Bolton did his own thing and Trump trusted him until he screwed up and Trump dump him...so now Bolton has an axe to grind, I wouldn't trust a word he has to say at this point.
#122322
"...so now Bolton has an axe to grind, I wouldn't trust a word he has to say at this point."-RealTool

Doesn't it bother you at all that you believe EVERYONE who has ever known Trump has an axe to grind? What the fuck does he do to them that nobody likes him after they have worked for him?

We already know that they are "the best people" when he hires them. Trump said so himself. And yet now you say every one of them is a liar after exposure to Trump. It sounds like Trump is toxic.


Things that make you go "Hmmmmm..." right, Tool?
#122332
Trump told reporterson the White House lawn that what he "specifically" expected to result from his Ukraine call with Zelensky was that Ukraine would open an investigation into the Bidens. What johnforbes thinks the call meant is irrelevant because Trump told us exactly what he expected and it is not what johnforbes claims, i.e. that nothing was wrong with the call.

It is on video.

McConnel and Graham argued FOR witnesses and asserted that an impeachable offense need not be a crime 20 years ago.

It is also on video, and anybody can watch it.
Obliterated what?

I understand that Trump HASN'T been subpoenaed yet[…]

Amazing. I merely report the well documented facts[…]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]

Remember Brooke Shields in her Calvin Klein Jeans?[…]

Mr Forbes has never cited AI. In the most charmin[…]