[johnforbes]

All charges related to some failure to cooperate with Mueller's partisan probe, which was staffed with 100 percent Democrats.

So where was the Russia collusion?

Well, Hillary used Russia sources for the fake dossier, and she sold uranium to Russia, and her foundation got millions.

She broke 18 USC 793, and the fake dossier was used to wiretap Trump, and Mueller didn't care at all about that.

[namngulfvet]

I hope they impeach the bitch........ OH wait she lost didnt she..... ROFLMAO she still needs be in prison

[RealJustme]

Another great day for America!

[Clownkicker]

johnny, we can't trust anything that comes out of a group made up solely of Democrats, can we? And we can't trust anything that "RINO" Mueller reports. You have been saying that for months.

Now all of a sudden you are saying everything they say is true? :lol:

[RealJustme]

That’s not coyotes you hear outside, that’s liberals screaming at the sky. It's election night all over again.

[namngulfvet]

Ok hold on now! Elk told us Trump would be in prison within 30 days of taking office.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[namngulfvet]

Rachel Maddow on Verge of Tears over Mueller Report

The Mueller report came in on Friday night.

And the big news was that the Special Counsel’s investigation was now over and that there would be no more indictments.

That means there would be no indictments related to any Russia collusion. None of the public information so far that has shown any evidence of Trump team collusion with Russia.

The news was just too much to take for some of the pundits who had invested the last two years in helping to spread the conspiracy theory, like MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.

She was on a fishing trip but rushed back to be on air to talk about the report.

But she appeared barely able to hold it together, she seemed so upset that there weren’t going to be any more indictments. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

https://www.chicksonright.com/youngcons ... n-cMU3LIc4" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Are you fucking kidding me.. She just had to rush back so she could be on the Air... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: Liberals are in a tail spin...... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

Great day to be an American! Hung my flag out this morning just to piss liberals off.

[sillydaddy]

Went to have breakfast at one of my favorite eateries, this morning....
wore my best MAGA cap and left it on throughout the meal...
left the waitress a generous tip..
then as I was paying I asked the cashier for the military discount....!
It's good to be an American …...

[johnforbes]

No, I never called Mueller a RINO.

If he ever was a registered Repub, he obviously switched into the Swamp.

Mueller hired 100 percent partisan Dems for his probe.

I would like any such probe, whether from Ken Starr or Mueller, to be NEUTRAL.

Neutral means neutral, and not partisan.

Mueller ran a totally partisan probe.

[RealJustme]

Watch libtards whine when the current DOJ picks a special counsel to investigate the swamp gang who abused our government to try and remove the President and that person picks all Republicans as investigators and lawyers to conduct the investigations.

The White House said this morning now that the Mueller investigation is over, investigations into government abuses of power to remove a President can now begin. It's coming

[Clownkicker]

"No, I never called Mueller a RINO.
If he ever was a registered Repub, he obviously switched into the Swamp."-johnflubs

johnny, you can't say you never called Mueller a RINO and then repeat what you have saying for months calling him a RINO.
"If he ever was a registered Repub, he obviously switched into the Swamp."<--- :lol:

Exactly WHAT do you think a RINO is, johnny?

[RealJustme]

Clown once again tries to walk back his words. :lol:

[Clownkicker]

RealTool once again tries to distract from johnny's humiliation. :lol:

And once again, dimwit, unlike you I stand by everything I posted. I take nothing back.

[namngulfvet]

RealTool once again tries to distract from johnny's humiliation. :lol:

And once again, dimwit, unlike you I stand by everything I posted. I take nothing back.

Once again "Clown" tries to distract from the OP. His attention span is that of a Nat.

[johnforbes]

No, I never called Mueller a RINO. There were claims he was once, long ago, a registered Repub, but there never was any proof and it was probably untrue.

Mueller hired 100 percent partisan Dems for his probe.

I would like any such probe, whether from Ken Starr or Mueller, to be NEUTRAL.

Neutral means neutral, and not partisan.

Mueller ran a totally partisan probe.

[elklindo69]

All charges related to some failure to cooperate with Mueller's partisan probe, which was staffed with 100 percent Democrats.

So where was the Russia collusion?

Well, Hillary used Russia sources for the fake dossier, and she sold uranium to Russia, and her foundation got millions.

She broke 18 USC 793, and the fake dossier was used to wiretap Trump, and Mueller didn't care at all about that.

The report was not made public so how would you know there was no collusion or whatever?

Now I suppose that you believe the fake news liberal media?

Why do think it is that Trump has kept his tiny fingers off his twitter feed?

[sillydaddy]

"No Collusion" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

Clown will deny that's what the report says :lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin, jot this down and remember it.

More than a year ago, everybody in D.C. knew there was zero Russia collusion.

How?

Because Mueller's staff, which was all Democrat, did not leak any info to the Wash Post or NY Times.

Sad but true that this is proof, but that is how The Swamp works.

Dems should subpoena Mueller and ask him how long ago he knew, for sure, there was zero evidence of Russia collusion on Trump's part. (Hillary did collude with Russia on the fake dossier, and she did sell uranium, and her foundation did indeed profit.)

It'll turn out to be more than a year ago that he knew.

[RealJustme]

Dems should subpoena Mueller

Trump is praying they do so, this way Republicans can ask Mueller under oath about how the investigation came about, was the evidence used to obtain warrants to spy on Americans based upon validated information, where did that evidence come from, was Hillary or the DNC involved in producing or paying for that evidence? etc etc

The truth is Mueller with a team of over 100 people and $25 Million dollars over a two year period couldn't find any evidence of a crime by Trump or anyone for collusion or conspiracy. Mueller tried really hard including raiding Americans' homes, threatening their freedom and illegal spying, but in the end he came up empty handed...because there was nothing there to find, just as Trump said two years ago.

The biggest attempt ever by our government to over throw an elected President just took place and heads should swing.

[namngulfvet]

Crickets from Clown and Elk.. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[elklindo69]

Mueller: "I can not exonerate President Trump of obstruction of justice."

[RealJustme]

Mueller: "I can not exonerate President Trump of obstruction of justice."

Of course not, he can't exonerate anyone of anything, he's not a judge or jury.

[johnforbes]

Exactly.

It would be interesting to know what idiot working for the probe wrote that "exonerate" sentence because it showed ignorance of the process.

And let's just consider the obstruction notion. Mueller spent millions on this nonsense, there were thousands of interviews, and staffers flew all over the world pretending to look for some Russia angle that any rational person not into some new McCarthyism knew all along was absurd.

Everything Trump did was to permit this two years of a witch hunt to go on and on and on and on, so there was no obstruction either.

I cut Mueller slack as a veteran, but it was nutty to hire all partisan Democrats because it make it clear this was partisan.

Meanwhile, Hillary did collude with Russia and did break 18 USC 793 and did sell uranium to Russia, but all that was ignored.

Equal justice under the law? No,

[sillydaddy]

It would be interesting to know what idiot working for the probe wrote that "exonerate" sentence because it showed ignorance of the process.

Comey did that with Hillary because Lynch was in tatters after being threaten by Bubba in that plane..
So some Comey wannabe thought it was the way things are done now...!
Elk being the idiot that he is ...saw nothing wrong with it....and why would he?
the liberal media is reporting as if Mueller had the power to "exonerate" but
chose not to....! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[elklindo69]

Mueller: "I can not exonerate President Trump of obstruction of justice."

Of course not, he can't exonerate anyone of anything, he's not a judge or jury.

So then Trump's claim that he's exonerated is a lie?

[Clownkicker]

"Mueller: "I can not exonerate President Trump of obstruction of justice."

"Of course not, he can't exonerate anyone of anything, he's not a judge or jury."-RealTool

"Exactly."-johnfibs

"Have you read the IG report I've been totally exonerated."-Donald Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-YCLsA-FD4 (Time stamp 1:22)

So SOMEONE here doesn't know what the fuck they are talking about.

Is it RealTool? Or johnforbes? Or is it Donald Trump?

I'll give you dimwits three guesses. :lol:

[namngulfvet]

Whine for us "Clown"

54278865_10214380842056333_7528483139040051200_n.jpg (19.21 KiB) Viewed 7498 times

55492933_2199364586797285_8122250788480221184_n.jpg (52.71 KiB) Viewed 7498 times

[johnforbes]

Prosecutors don't exonerate people.

[Clownkicker]

Finally, johnforbes calls Trump ignorant, just as we have been telling him for years.

Good for you, johnny.

[elklindo69]

According to McConnell:

McConnell, noting that it took nearly two years for Mueller to conduct his investigation, said: “It’s not unreasonable to give the special counsel and the Justice Department just a little time to complete their review in a professional and responsible manner.”

Yet Barr read that huge report in less than 48 hours and cleared the President?

Really...give me a fucking break.

[sillydaddy]

Elk...Not everyone has to sound out every word they read...like you do..! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[namngulfvet]

Y

et Barr read that huge report in less than 48 hours and cleared the President?

Really...give me a fucking break.

Im sure Barr was kept in the loop on everything going on. It normally happens that way in DC. to bad your too stupid to see it.

[elklindo69]

Prosecutors don't exonerate people.

Says Trump's lawyer.

:lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin, really.

How dumb are you?

Prosecutors do not "exonerate" people, and I'm not Trump's lawyer.

Elkin, even knowing you don't have that great an education, you should nonetheless know the exonerating people, clearing them, declaring innocence...these things are not the role of prosecutors.

[Clownkicker]

"Elkin, really.
How dumb are you?
Prosecutors do not "exonerate" people"-johnflubs

"Have you read the IG report I've been totally exonerated."-Donald Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-YCLsA-FD4 (Time stamp 1:22)

Apparently he's exactly as dumb as Trump is, johnny. Are you calling Trump "dumb"?

Either both of them are smart or both of them are dumb. Which is it, johnny? :lol:

[johnforbes]

I'm calling him wrong in thinking that is the role of a prosecutor.

Look, we all know the game -- people pretend a prosecutor can "exonerate" people or declare them saintly, and that is simply wrong regardless of what politician saying it.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, you're just being hypocritical again.

You call elklindo "dumb" for saying it but then only call Trump "wrong" for saying it.
"Elkin, really.
How dumb are you?
Prosecutors do not "exonerate" people"-johnflubs

Even someone as dishonest as you can't avoid seeing your partisan hypocrisy in this.
Either both of them are smart or both of them are dumb.
You think Trump is dumb. Just admit what everyone has known for two years.

[johnforbes]

No, there is a difference.

Elkin is not a politician spinning the events of the day to his benefit.

Being fair to Elkin, he is genuinely ignorant.

[namngulfvet]

"Elkin, really.
How dumb are you?

How is this calling Elk Dumb? Hes asking Elk if he is Dumb. Big difference.. And yest Elk is dumb...

Proving once again you cant read let alone comprehend

[Clownkicker]

So johnny, you're saying Trump is LYING to us? You're saying he actually knows it's wrong but says it anyway? He's given a pass for lying?

And why can't elklindo 'spin the events of the day to his benefit' without being ridiculed for what Trump is doing?
Do politicians get some special dispensation for dishonesty and misleading America?

Criminy......Republicans.... nothing but weasel excuses for their dishonesty and ignorance. :lol:

[namngulfvet]

So johnny, you're saying Trump is LYING to us? You're saying he actually knows it's wrong but says it anyway? He's given a pass for lying?

And why can't elklindo 'spin the events of the day to his benefit' without being ridiculed for what Trump is doing?
Do politicians get some special dispensation for dishonesty and misleading America?

Criminy......Republicans.... nothing but weasel excuses for their dishonesty and ignorance. :lol:

'
Thanks for admitting your the spin Queen of the board. putting a spin on something is the same as lying your ass off.. So thanks for admitting your also a lying sack of shit.

[Clownkicker]

"putting a spin on something is the same as lying your ass off.."-namandgulfdumbfuck

"No, there is a difference.
Elkin is not a politician [like Trump] spinning the events of the day to his benefit."-johnforbes

"Have you read the IG report I've been totally exonerated."-Donald Trump
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-YCLsA-FD4 (Time stamp 1:22)

So thanks for admitting Trump is a lying sack of shit, dumbfuck. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[namngulfvet]

"Clown" only in your head is putting a spin on something not a lie.
Putting a spin on anything is lying. When you twist a statement someone made, that makes it a lie.. No matter how "you" put it "Clown" !!

[Clownkicker]

Like I said, dimwit, since johnforbes said Trump was a politician putting a "spin" on the Mueller report, you just agreed that Trump is lying, no matter how anyone puts it, "namandgulfdumbfuck"!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


johnny, this cinches it. namandgulfdumbfuck is officially the dumbest person on the internet.
And yes, he IS one of YOU. :lol:

[namngulfvet]

Like I said, dimwit, since johnforbes said Trump was a politician putting a "spin" on the Mueller report, you just agreed that Trump is lying, no matter how anyone puts it, "namandgulfdumbfuck"!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


johnny, this cinches it. namandgulfdumbfuck is officially the dumbest person on the internet.
And yes, he IS one of YOU. :lol:

Looks like I hit "Clowns" got butt hurt button again.. :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

54523356_2381319608586014_4378546912903561216_n.jpg (35.25 KiB) Viewed 7356 times

[elklindo69]

Elkin, really.

How dumb are you?

Prosecutors do not "exonerate" people, and I'm not Trump's lawyer.

Elkin, even knowing you don't have that great an education, you should nonetheless know the exonerating people, clearing them, declaring innocence...these things are not the role of prosecutors.

You're hypocritical jackass Johnnie.

First of all...Barr's "report" paraphrased Mueller. It was Mueller who said that Trump was not exonerated.

Then Trump claimed that he was exonerated. Which contradicted Mueller's assertion.

And it was Trump's lawyer who claimed that only a Jury can exonerate people.

So then Trump's a liar and a dummy...right Johnnie.

:lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin, you give new and fresh meaning to "slow on the uptake."

Prosecutors do not "exonerate" people.

Sure, politicians seek to spin things, but the facts remain.

Now, for no fee, you have had your concepts clarified.

Go forth into the fray with enhanced understanding.