Political discussions about everything
User avatar
By RealJustme
#114633
Since there were no charges against Trump or his family, Mueller's report has to avoid disparaging or incriminating information against them...that's according to the person who hired and supervised Mueller. Thus the reason for the late Friday dump.
Rosenstein made it clear he believes the Department of Justice will not – and cannot without violating long-standing Department of Justice policy – include disparaging or incriminating information about anybody who has not been charged with a crime when releasing the Mueller report.

"Punishing wrongdoers through judicial proceedings is only one part of the Department's mission," Rosenstein wrote. "We also have a duty to prevent the disclosure of information that would unfairly tarnish people who are not charged with crimes."
Just to rub it in a little more, Trump told Mueller to take a hike when Mueller insisted he had to undergo interviews. Guess what, those interviews never took place and Mueller's report has been completed. Trump refused to fall for his trap of catching him in one misstatement so there could be "some" type of charges.


Happy, joy, joy. :D
By johnforbes
#114635
Every person Mueller hired was a Democrat, so anything they found on Trump would have been leaked right away.

So it has been known for over a year that there was no Russia collusion by Trump, but of course Hillary did collude with Russia on the fake dossier, she sold uranium to Russia, and her foundation got big...
User avatar
By RealJustme
#114647
Clown and Elk are in state of shock that Mueller's investigation found nothing, they're clinging to CNN for some glimmer of hope that Democrats will promise another investigation to get Trump.
By Clownkicker
#114650
"Clown and Elk are in state of shock that Mueller's investigation found nothing,..."-RealTool

You don't know anything about what they found or didn't find, Tool. You're just making up stupid shit, as always. :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#114652
You don't know anything about what they found or didn't find, Tool. You're just making up stupid shit, as always
You must have missed Mueller's announcement that he found NO evidence to indict anyone for anything, other than those who have already been indicted and that he recommends there be no new indictments. :D
By Clownkicker
#114654
Only Mueller didn't say that, did he, Tool.

Mueller didn't announce ANYTHING, so YOU missed the alleged announcement too. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You're just making up stupid shit again.
By sillydaddy
#114657
Yep....
DOJ announced there are no more indictments ….
Should have seen all the long faces on CNN....you think Trump had won the election all over again..!
I swear I saw Van Jones actually cry, declaring," There is no Santa Claus.." his exact words..! :lol: :lol:
By Clownkicker
#114658
...and RealTool desperately backpedals his lies. :lol: :lol: :lol:

"Mueller has recommended that there be no new charges since there's nothing there."-RealStool

Only he didn't say that either, Tool.

Try--just TRY to say something, ANYTHING-- that isn't made up stupid shit. Please.
By Clownkicker
#114661
No, he didn't, or are you insisting Mueller said he "recommended that there be no new charges since there's nothing there."

If so, give us a link to FOXnews covering the announcement where he said it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By Clownkicker
#114679
Why would I slink away, Tool?

When CNN and every other media on the planet proves me right and proves that you lied, that Mueller didn't "announce" anything and that he didn't say there would be no new charges "because there is nothing there", I will only be back here rubbing your snout in it. :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#114777
I knew instantly that the Mueller report would be bad news for the democrats when it was dumped late afternoon on a Friday. Had it been adverse to Trump it would have been dumped on a Monday morning.

There is no doubt Mueller started out to take Trump out using false information and illegal obtained evidence but he was smart enough to realize as time passed, Americans had figured out what was going on and he knew and charges he brought would in time disclose he was part of the resistance. He backed off to save his own ass from the prosecutions that will take place.
By johnforbes
#114806
I agree with Dems that he ought to testify.

Sooner or later, somebody will ask:

"When, precisely, were you sure there was no Russia collusion? Isn't it true that you knew this 18 months ago, but kept it secret?"
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#114809
elklindo69 wrote:Apparently Lindsey Graham doesn't want Mueller to testify for the congress....

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol:
Theres a new investigation on who started all this stupid shit Elk. Thats when its all going to come out..
By elklindo69
#114838
namngulfvet wrote:
elklindo69 wrote:Apparently Lindsey Graham doesn't want Mueller to testify for the congress....

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol:
Theres a new investigation on who started all this stupid shit Elk. Thats when its all going to come out..
We haven't even seen the report yet?

:lol:
Handling Crime in DC

So is this why Trump sent in the National Guard to[…]

Footlong Felon

Apparently the Trumped up felony charges of assaul[…]

"Obama-appointed Judge Engelmayer has rejecte[…]

All that we ask, on this fine forum, is that Clown[…]

Obliterated what?

Mr Forbes, after careful scrutiny of this thread, […]

Having the Clintons Testify

Having the Clintons testify about the Epstein mess[…]

Come on Elkin, if you had ever been there, you'd k[…]

Evidence from the Durham Annex

"Now evidence from the Durham annex proving t[…]