[johnforbes]

So a fellow who served as an MP with Moore says they were invited to a bar in the ville to discuss some info, they came along, and it turned out to be a brothel.

Moore said he felt uncomfortable in the cathouse and the two left, leaving the third MP who invited them there.

So, if Moore is the predatory chap the Washington Post contends, why didn't he buy a hooker in a little Dodge City in a combat zone?

[Clownkicker]

You don't need to be a "predator" with hookers, dummy. They're a sure thing.

But one of the appeals of young girls to pedophiles is that they are still "pure" and "innocent".

I hate to tell you, johnny, but hookers don't meet those criteria.
It would have been far more exculpatory if he had actually bought the adult hooker.

[johnforbes]

No, it actually helps Moore's case a lot.

And it is fair to note ALL the evidence, not just that which casts Moore in a bad light, which is why CNN will not provide this info.

The percentage who would use hookers in this scenario (possible early death in a war zone) is very hight.

But Moore was pure to the lure.

[Intrepid]

It's instructive to see the AssClown knows proper whorehouse ettiquite.
Being raised in a whorehouse gives one special knowledge apparently.

[sillydaddy]

I'm thinking they had him polishing the "chamber pots" ... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: