Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#88347
NY Post:

New revelations have surfaced that the Obama administration abused intelligence during the election by launching a massive domestic spy campaign that included snooping on Trump officials.

The irony is mind-boggling: Targeting political opposition is long a technique of police states like Russia, which Team Obama has loudly condemned for allegedly using its own intelligence agencies to hack into our election.

The revelations, as well as testimony this week from former Obama intel officials, show the extent to which the Obama administration politicized and weaponized intelligence against Americans.

Thanks to Circa News, we now know the National Security Agency under President Barack Obama routinely violated privacy protections while snooping through foreign intercepts involving US citizens — and failed to disclose the breaches, prompting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court a month before the election to rebuke administration officials.

The story concerns what’s known as “upstream” data collection under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, under which the NSA looks at the content of electronic communication. Upstream refers to intel scooped up about third parties: Person A sends Person B an email mentioning Person C. Though Person C isn’t a party to the email, his information will be scooped up and potentially used by the NSA.

Further, the number of NSA data searches about Americans mushroomed after Obama loosened rules for protecting such identities from government officials and thus the reporters they talk to.
#88354
johnny, I would discuss this but apparently we aren't allowed to discuss topics without solid evidence.

However, feel free to use this thread as a chance for you to post solid evidence that Obama tried to hack the election.
#88358
However, feel free to use this thread as a chance for you to post solid evidence that Obama tried to hack the election.
Youwant "solid" evidence? How about "any" evidence Trump worked with the Russians, it doesn't even have to be solid.
#88361
It's good to see that all of the usual suspects refused to discuss this topic since they don't have any solid evidence to support it.

Your sensibilities must be spreading, johnny. They all want nothing to do with political discussion.

Soon, if all goes your way, there won't be a single discussion left on this forum.
It'll be all AssClown Insipid dancing and RealTool trolling, all the time.
#88366
And yet the Marxist tool fool AssClown cannot factually contest
anything in a couple of my latest posts but has to try his victory dance (which consists of spinning his wheelchair in circles) over a phrase Trump used.

Emoticons boy, we need emoticons.
#88372
The FISA court rebuke is simply a fact.

There are ZERO FACTS to support the Left's big lie about Russia, when the facts are the Podestas were lobbyists for Russian firms and Hillary cut a uranium deal with Russia in exchange for BIll getting speaking fees.
#88374
johnny, we cannot discuss this topic without solid evidence.

You claim no one has any solid evidence of the Trump campaign/Russia ties, but then you fail to produce any solid evidence for your claim that "Team Obama" tried to hack the election.

I don't think anyone can ethically comment further on the topic until you do.
#88397
johnny, it's not the Ethics Coordinator that concerns me.

It's your delicate and fragile mind I don't want to risk damaging just because I lack "solid evidence" to argue against your completely unfounded opinions. Your insistence on "solid evidence" before discussing an issue seems to be a requirement of your bizarrely anal retentive "Weltbild".

It's like what the nice man in the white coat where you live has told us many times: never challenge a mentally ill person's delusions. It could precipitate a reactive episode of physical violence involving judo.
#88398
"White House sources say"......... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Ever notice that CNN always, and I mean always, makes a disclaimer either at the start , middle or end of
any story about the President or the Russian investigation? Sometimes the disclaimer is as brief as "I don't really know but..."
Just listen for it ...It's there every time...... BUT Why?


Because It's CNN's way of legally covering their ass!
It's their version of ....Believe It...or NOT! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
#88410
I have contacted the Delicacy Coordinator, and he also has assured me that discussion may proceed forthwith.

As to judo, it is not violent.

It is the gentle way.

As you slam into the mat, or a joint lock is applied with tendons audibly tearing, it is gentle.
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

#