[johnforbes]

So far, Democrats have brought up Russia.

But provided ZERO EVIDENCE.

There are interesting things out there about Seth Rich, and this theory seems far more credible than the Russia tall tale.

Thoughts?

[Intrepid]

Whacked because he knew too much and was showing signs of weak knees.

Chief suspects are Killery and elements tied to the DNC.

[Clownkicker]

So far, Republicans have brought up Seth Rich.

But provided ZERO EVIDENCE.

There are interesting things out there about Russia, and this theory seems far more credible than the Seth Rich tall tale from a single source.

Thoughts?

[johnforbes]

The entire DNC, and the entire MSM, have been bleating about "Russia," but provided ZERO EVIDENCE to back up their ongoing claims.

Another theory, the Seth Rich one, could be shot down at any moment by the DC police and/or the FBI, but both sources have said little.

Where is Seth's laptop?

Why did Julian Assange make those tantalizing references to Seth if he was not leaking?

If the Russia theory is worthy of a special counsel with no evidence whatever, surely the Seth theory is worth discussing?

[Intrepid]

18582240_1370235956424353_7975160580003633438_n.jpg (17.23 KiB) Viewed 1898 times

[Clownkicker]

"The entire DNC, and the entire MSM, have been bleating about "Russia," but provided ZERO EVIDENCE to back up their ongoing claims."-johndimwit

Of course, the MSM has produced lots of evidence. Johnforbes just doesn't think it's "solid evidence" (obviously an esoteric legal term.)

Thus the calls for Congressional investigations, dummy; to get the "solid evidence" you demand.
The DNC and the MSM are not the FBI. They're not Congress. They're not the Justice Department.

You keep claiming to have legal training but repeatedly fail to grasp the simple concept that the only way to get "solid evidence" for anything is to have some legally recognized body actually LOOK for it, you buffoon.

[johnforbes]

The entire DNC, and the entire MSM, have been bleating about "Russia," but provided ZERO EVIDENCE to back up their ongoing claims.

Another theory, the Seth Rich one, could be shot down at any moment by the DC police and/or the FBI, but both sources have said little.

Where is Seth's laptop?

Why did Julian Assange make those tantalizing references to Seth if he was not leaking?

If the Russia theory is worthy of a special counsel with no evidence whatever, surely the Seth theory is worth discussing?