[RealJustme]

Everyone knew this was happening, Trump has said this is serious abuse of a government position that amounts to a felony if true and that he has instructed Sessions to conduct a full investigation.

Bangladesh prime minister says Clinton personally pressured her to help foundation donor. While secretary of state, Hillary Clinton made a personal call to pressure Bangladesh’s prime minister to aid a donor to her husband’s charitable foundation despite federal ethics laws that require government officials to recuse themselves from matters that could impact their spouse’s business.

The Office of Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina confirmed to Circa that Mrs. Clinton called her office in March 2011 to demand that Dr. Muhammed Yunus, a 2006 Nobel Peace prize winner, be restored to his role as chairman of the country’s most famous microcredit bank, Grameen Bank. The bank’s nonprofit Grameen America, which Yunus chairs, has given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the Clinton Global Initiative. Grameen Research, which is chaired by Yunus, has donated between $25,000 and $50,000, according to the Clinton Foundation website.

“Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton telephoned Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in March 2011 insisting her not to remove Dr. Muhammad Yunus from the post of Managing Director of Grameen Bank,” Deputy Press Secretary Md Nazrul Islam told Circa in an email.

The Associated Press reported in August, that at least 85 of 154 “people from private interests who met or had phone conversations with Clinton while she led the State Department donated to her family charity” or pledged to donate to one of her international programs.

While Mrs. Clinton was at the State Department she personally pushed through an approval of 20 percent sale of U.S. uranium production capacity to the Russian Atomic Energy Agency. The company donated $2.5 million to the Clinton Foundation while the deal was ongoing and before the deal was finalized President Bill Clinton was invited to Moscow and given $500,000 for a speech on the Clinton Foundation.

And when it came to Yunus, declassified cables show that Mr. Yunus sought to use Mrs. Clinton’s power as secretary of state to pressure the Bangladesh government

[Clownkicker]

"... before the deal was finalized President Bill Clinton was invited to Moscow and given $500,000 for a speech on the Clinton Foundation." Of course, I'm sure you mean FORMER President Bill Clinton, right?


Tool, you pretend to be bothered by this, but Flynn taking $30,000 from the Russian government and nearly $70,000 from Russian companies while advising the Trump campaign and right before becoming National Security Advisor, after Trump being warned by Obama and told three times by the AG that Flynn was compromised doesn't bother you in the least.

Why is that, Tool? Why doesn't that bother you? Not one thread from you on that topic...
Why are you so desperate to deflect from what Trump is doing right before your eyes?

[johnforbes]

If the facts are as stated, both Hillary and Flynn would be wrong.

Hillary's case is far more crucial because she was seeking the presidency and dragging her corrupt hubby along.

[Clownkicker]

No, johnny, Flynn's case is far more crucial because Trump knew about it, didn't care, and hired Flynn anyway (exposing our most sensitive secrets to someone who couldn't pass everyday security clearances.)
Trump is STILL in the White House affecting world events and putting our Constitution at risk with similar poor choices.


Hillary can be dealt with anytime without further risk.
Trump needs to be dealt with TODAY. He still holds power.
But that will likely only happen once Flynn is prosecuted, which will legally show the first of Trump's ties with Russia.

[sillydaddy]

Flynn was fired by the President....4 days after Yates claims she voiced concerns...

the Demos are quick to accuse the Trump administration did not heed Yates
I think The administration would not have fired Flynn without first verifying what Yates had said.
after all she was just a "temp" for all practical purposes...

[Clownkicker]

No, silly, Flynn was fired 18 days after Yates voiced her concerns and two months after Obama warned him not to hire Flynn.

Do you honestly think it is prudent to have a guy without the required security clearance allowed into the most sensitive job in national security for an additional two and a half weeks when you know positively that he is a security risk? :shock:

"the Demos are quick to accuse the Trump administration did not heed Yates "-sillydaddy

He waited 18 days, silly. Who does such a thing when the stakes are that high?
"National Security" <---Does that phrase mean ANYTHING to you? Flynn hadn't passed his security checks. He's an admitted foreign agent. He didn't get permission from the Pentagon or Congress to take foreign money the previous year. This stuff isn't even denied by Flynn.
Does ANY of this register with you?
"the Demos are quick to accuse the Trump administration did not heed Yates " :shock: Are you kidding?


"I think The administration would not have fired Flynn without first verifying what Yates had said."-sillydaddy

And how would someone go about verifying something like that, silly?
Maybe ask his Acting Attorney General if it's true? :shock:

"after all she was just a "temp" for all practical purposes..."-sillydaddy

She had been at her job for two years looking into exactly that kind of stuff.
What does it take for you to consider someone "qualified" silly?
You have no problem with Trump hiring all sorts of people who have no experience whatsoever for their jobs, yet you consider them qualified to run our government. :shock:

For you to make that last post you have to be completely oblivious to what's going on in Washington D.C.

[namngulfvet]

Why would we believe anything a loony lib has to say. Your all fucking nuts and fruits. Not one of you would know the truth if it slapped you in the fucking cocksukcer

[sillydaddy]

So Clown..you're saying the media would have accepted
the firing of Flynn with the explanation that the President did it based solely on what Yates said?... :o
I bet even she would have denied that....
If in fact ..if you heard her at the Congressional hearing...the only thing she would admit to
was that Flynn was a blackmail risk....

[RealJustme]

Tool, you pretend to be bothered by this, but Flynn taking $30,000 from the Russian government and nearly $70,000 from Russian companies while advising the Trump campaign and right before becoming National Security Advisor, after Trump being warned by Obama and told three times by the AG that Flynn was compromised doesn't bother you in the least.

What the Clintons did with Russia bothers me $5 million dollars more. The Russian got nothing from Flynn but they got material to build nuclear weapons from the Clintons. Plus Trump fired Flynn, duhhh!

[Clownkicker]

"...you're saying the media would have accepted
the firing of Flynn with the explanation that the President did it based solely on what Yates said?"-sillydaddy

Of course not. You're still missing the point, silly. Trump ignored Yates entirely.
Well, except for stopping her from testifying before the House Intelligence Committee by getting the hearings shut down, and then he fired her for sending over classified information to the White House, of course.
Trump lost any deniability.

Trump had no intention of ever firing Flynn, even after being warned by the Acting AG. (Not to mention being warned by Obama two months before) He proved it by letting Flynn stay for 18 more days.

The only reason Trump finally gave in and fired Flynn is that some of the stuff Yates had told him started to come out in the papers. Then he had no choice any longer. At that point he scrambled for some damage control. (Which is failing miserably, I might add.)

"If in fact ..if you heard her at the Congressional hearing...the only thing she would admit to
was that Flynn was a blackmail risk...."-sillydaddy

Then you need to start listening better, silly. She also said:
"GRAHAM: Ms. Yates, do you have any evidence—are you aware of any evidence that would suggest that in the 2016 campaign anybody in the Trump campaign colluded—colluded with the Russian government intelligence services in improper fashion?

YATES: And Senator, my answer to that question would require me to reveal classified information. And so, I—I can’t answer that."

She repeatedly said Flynn's "underlying behavior" was, in its own right, what really concerned her. But she can't tell anyone what that behavior was outside of secret closed door briefings.

Read some more and educate yourself:https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/ ... hat-a.html

[Clownkicker]

"The Russian got nothing from Flynn but they got material to build nuclear weapons from the Clintons."-RealStool

This lie has already been explained to you, Tool.
None of the uranium from that deal can be exported from the U.S.. Yet you keep repeating the lie.
Russia didn't get anything to build nuclear weapons with, dummy.

"Plus Trump fired Flynn, duhhh!"-RealStool

But it needs to bother you that Trump hired Flynn and kept him on knowing that he had committed offenses that clearly warranted firing.
Simply getting rid of Flynn doesn't make the actual problem go away. The problem is the guy who hired Flynn knowing that he shouldn't. He knew exactly who Flynn was.
Clinton is old news that can be dealt with after this more pressing problem is handled.

[sillydaddy]

Only thing Yates "said" was that Flynn was a blackmail risk....
and that "classified bs" she spouted as an answer to a leading question from Graham
simply meant she would have to be given immunity before answering.... :o

Nothing about anyone going to jail.....Clown!

Those idiots you read...must be hearing voices... :lol: :lol:

[johnforbes]

Clowntoker has not been in like Flynn here.