Political discussions about everything
By Intrepid
#86758
During the past decade, a common theme in the research findings of climate alarmists studying California, Oregon, and Washington state has been reduced snowfall. Some alarmists even lamented it could be “the end of snow,” as Porter Fox did for the New York Times in 2014. Yet, despite these extreme predictions, which also blamed humans for burning the fossil fuels that caused the warmer temperatures, the 2017 winter has provided the region with greater snowfall, leaving climate change advocates looking more than just a little foolish.

According to a report by the Los Angeles Times, the snowpack in California’s Sierra Nevada Mountains is the seventh-deepest it’s been since 1950 and the biggest since 2011.

“As of Thursday, the snowpack across the entire Sierra was at 164% of average for this time of year,” reported the Times. “The northern region was at 147%, the central was at 175% and the southern was 164% of average, respectively, state data showed.”

Writing for the Washington Policy Center, Todd Myers, the organization’s director of the Center for the Environment, reported on Wednesday there is “no sign of warming” in Washington state. Among Myers’ “key findings” is that despite the fact “academics, like U.W. Professor Paul Johnson, say that declining snowpack levels in the Northwest is a sign of global warming,” “They’re wrong. Snowpack levels have been above average in eight of the last ten years.”


Myers also wrote, “In the winter of 2015-16 snowpack was 112% of normal. In 2016-17 it was 115% of normal.”

The Bend, a newspaper in central Oregon, reported in January the central Oregon region had received “historic snow depths” that smashed records going back at least 20 years.

These findings are in total contradiction to the claims made by climate change alarmists over the past decade. For instance, in 2015, climate change researchers at the University of Arizona claimed their findings revealed the “extreme character” of the Sierra Nevada snowpack and the changing nature of California winters.

“Our study really points to the extreme character of the 2014-15 winter,” said Valerie Trouet, a professor at the University of Arizona’s Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research. “This is not just unprecedented over 80 years—it’s unprecedented over 500 years.”

“We should be prepared for this type of snow drought to occur much more frequently because of rising temperatures,” Trouet said. “Anthropogenic warming is making the drought more severe.”


Summarizing research conducted on the Pacific Northwest and climate change, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wrote on its website in October 2011, “Increases in extreme high precipitation (falling as rain) in the western Cascades and reductions in snowpack are key projections from high-resolution regional climate models.”

As recent data clearly show, nothing could be further from the truth.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#86767
I have a hard time believing that there are grown adults who still think man is warming the planet, it's been debunked several times.

Facts:

- There is proof the climate changes...No Duhhh! Always has, always will.

- There is no proof man caused those climate changes, in fact there is proof there were more climate changes before (God or evolution, take your pick) put people on the earth.

Now wouldn't it be refreshing if our schools taught the simple truth as I've laid it out?
User avatar
By tvd
#86768
Dogzilla wrote:Yer an idiot!

Dog...the global warming nuts are fucking falsifying their scientific research results!!!

What more do you want to prove their intention is simply to get more grant money?

They seriously hurt their own agenda by this falsification.
By Intrepid
#86769
I post factual, irrefutable evidence compiled by others, and short eyes Dogshit calls ME an idiot.

Do you see why you should pay whatever it takes to send your kids to a private school?
By Intrepid
#86774
This just in:
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
Didn't Elkindoofus used to go on and on about how accurate NASA studues were on ice depletion?
User avatar
By tvd
#86780
Dogzilla wrote:tvd....Do you go to church? Do they ask you for money? Do you think they falsify claims?

So you are suggesting two wrongs make a right.....gotcha.
By elklindo69
#86785
Intrepid wrote:This just in:
A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.
The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.
According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
Didn't Elkindoofus used to go on and on about how accurate NASA studues were on ice depletion?
Sea ice increases in Antarctica do not make up for the accelerated Arctic sea ice loss of the last decades, a new NASA study finds. As a whole, the planet has been shedding sea ice at an average annual rate of 13,500 square miles (35,000 square kilometers) since 1979, the equivalent of losing an area of sea ice larger than the state of Maryland every year.

“Even though Antarctic sea ice reached a new record maximum this past September, global sea ice is still decreasing,” said Claire Parkinson, author of the study and climate scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. “That’s because the decreases in Arctic sea ice far exceed the increases in Antarctic sea ice
By Intrepid
#86787
Read the very first line Elkindoofus.
The one where it says, "A NEW NASA study..."

You are still dredging up the bullshit they could only sell to you Useful Idiots. The evidence no longer supports the lies you've been fed.
By Clownkicker
#86788
Once again Loser Boy AssClown Insipid makes a fool of himself by believing that the snow pack this year in California (this year's weather) somehow disproves global climate change.
He ridicules climate researchers for predicting the "extreme character" of future winter weather and then holds up a report of this winter's snow pack which is 164% of normal. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Exactly what do you think the word "extreme" means, you moron? 164% of normal IS "extreme" you buffoon.
2/3 ABOVE normal is just as extreme as 2/3 below normal would be.
But because California is currently benefiting from the extreme weather (as it is relieving some of the very harmful effects of previous unusual weather there) he stupidly believes he needn't be concerned about extreme weather any longer.

But these same imbeciles also choose to overlook the other extreme weather around this country. johnforbes has been sweating like a pig on his runs because Washington D.C. has already hit 91 degrees in April for cripes sake, and the illiterate Loser Boy Insipid is unaware of the unusual tornadoes and flooding that are killing people in Texas and the Midwest now, as well as a late-season blizzard that hit Kansas.

But nothing to see here, eh AssClown Insipid? What's another 14 people dead from unusual weather?
No, to these losers those cases of extreme weather have nothing whatsoever to do with climate change either.
So what if such extreme weather is exactly the sort of thing the models predict? All Insipid needs to do is ignore all the weather that doesn't support his partisan political biases and he's happy as an ignorant Trump supporter.
Loser Boy AssClown Insipid will continue to bury his head in the mud and continue denying that anything is going on that should concern him.
By Intrepid
#86790
We would all like to thank the Marxist tool loser AssClown for wasting his limited time in a multi paragraph tirade that nobody read.

What it did do however was prove once again how much I own his ignorant ass.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#86798
Exactly what do you think the word "extreme" means
Man made "global warming" didn't work out when it was debunked, so libtards renamed it man made "climate change", every change is caused by man, next it'll be man made "climate", any consistent weather pattern will be man made. :lol:
By Dogzilla
#86802
It is extremely ignorant and shortsighted to think that 7 Billion of us doing our things on this little planet don't have any effects on the workings in the atmosphere or water.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#86804
It is extremely ignorant and shortsighted to think that 7 Billion of us doing our things on this little planet don't have any effects on the workings in the atmosphere or water
Who said it doesn't? Many of our cities have huge smog and pollution problems, filth is everywhere. Many of the world's health problems is caused by people living like pigs, eating like pigs, drugging like pigs and polluting the air around them, it's terrible...but it's not causing the climate to change. ;)
By Clownkicker
#86805
"La-la-la-la-la! La-la-la-la-la-la-la!"-LoserBoyAssClownInsipid with his fingers in his ears

As always, Loser Boy Insipid runs away when confronted with some facts about climate change since he cannot refute a thing I said.
Instead, he pretends he doesn't realize he has had his nose rubbed in his own ignorance once again.

What is it about conservatives that makes them think their refusal to read inconvenient truths somehow makes them look smart? They actually brag about their ignorance as a matter of pride, as we see Loser Boy AssClown Insipid do here once again.


What Assclown Insipid's pathetic, whining, impotent response did do however was prove once again how much I own his ignorant ass. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By Clownkicker
#86810
Loser Boy AssClown Insipid is one of those pussy 'tough guys' who shouts names back over his shoulder as he's running away. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Here puss-puss-puss-puss...
By Intrepid
#86888
Got six inches of snow last week in these parts AssClown.
I was glad I hadn't summarized the snowblower or run out of wood for the woodburner yet.

Stand by for another multi paragraph tantrum I won't bother to read.
By elklindo69
#86892
Intrepid wrote:Read the very first line Elkindoofus.
The one where it says, "A NEW NASA study..."

You are still dredging up the bullshit they could only sell to you Useful Idiots. The evidence no longer supports the lies you've been fed.
They were two separate independent studies you fucking jackass. The results are not correlated to each other.

LMFAO

:lol:
By Clownkicker
#86899
"Got six inches of snow last week in these parts AssClown."-LoserBoyAssClownInsipid

So what are these "parts AssClown" you're talking about, Loser Boy?
Are you saying you got six inches of snow up to your ankles...or your knees, you stupid little man? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Look how that stupid fucker Insipid loves dancing for me.
He posts another case of unusual, extreme weather in an attempt to ridicule me after I just explained to him that cases of extreme weather are exactly what the global climate change models predict. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Geezus, AssClown Insipid is one stupid fucker who loves to have his nose rubbed in his own shit. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

#