Political discussions about everything
#83186
Not being a techno geek I don't have the skills to cut and paste from my phone, although I know it can be done. But on Drudge right now is a story of how agencies such as NOAA and others fiddled the data to advance their false agenda.

Once again, climate change hysteria has nothing to do with climate and everything to do with politics, control of the people and economics.
#83188
I've been saying this all along with millions other, the fake data is all about the money and keeping their jobs! Libtards don't like facts, they want data to support their agenda, doesn't care if it fabricated or not.
Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data 
The Mail on Sunday can reveal a landmark paper exaggerated global warming
It was rushed through and timed to influence the Paris agreement on climate change
America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration broke its own rules
The report claimed the pause in global warming never existed, but it was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data

The world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.
A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.
It was never subjected to NOAA’s rigorous internal evaluation process – which Dr Bates devised.
His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.
#83225
Ya gotta love sillydaddy being so stupid he thinks his unseasonably warm 77 degree February weather somehow ridicules the claims of global warming. :lol:

He's as ridiculous as johnforbes running in a 75 degree December in Virginia two years ago and believing that weather was also unrelated to global warming.
#83235
Two things for you global warming chicken littles:

1: It sure would help your case if the experts you rely on didn't have to falsify their data.

2: No amount of taxation, confiscation of money, raising the cost of everyday living, etc. will stop or change global warming if it is happening. The earth will warm, the earth will cool. And I am not willing to part with a dime to try to change that. It will not work. Money would be thrown away.
#83239
It's about control, not climate.

That's why the AssClown Marxist Loser is so adamant.
His masters in the politboro have directed all the Useful Idiots to advance the myth of global warming to further their agenda.
#83257
key decisions were earlier taken by someone whose responsibility it was to maintain its integrity – and failed.’
NOAA not only failed, but it effectively mounted a cover-up when challenged over its data. After the paper was published, the US House of Representatives Science Committee launched an inquiry into its Pausebuster claims. NOAA refused to comply with subpoenas
Dr Bates retired from NOAA at the end of last year after a 40-year career in meteorology and climate science. As recently as 2014, the Obama administration awarded him a special gold medal for his work in setting new, supposedly binding standards ‘to produce and preserve climate data records’.

Yet when it came to the paper timed to influence the Paris conference, Dr Bates said, these standards were flagrantly ignored.
Wow.
#83296
In all of my 72 years on this fine electronic forum, I've never been so shocked at Clowntoker's harsh tone.

Just as soon as the snow ends (about 8 inches thus far), I shall respond.

At the present moment, it is simply too cold to type about global warming.
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

#