Political discussions about everything
By Intrepid
#81423
Average temperature of the U.S. last week, 16F.
Already colder than last winter, and winter doesn't start until the 21st.

At this point AssClown Loser Marxist Tool will hold forth for a dozen paragraphs (that no one will read) on the difference between weather and climate and then spew a few emoticons.
By Clownkicker
#81434
"April. The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for April 2016 was 1.10°C (1.98°F) above the 20th century average of 13.7°C (56.7°F)—the highest temperature departure for April since global records began in 1880."

"The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for May 2016 was the highest for May in the 137-year period of record, at 0.87°C (1.57°F) above the 20th century average of 14.8°C (58.6°F), besting the previous record set in 2015 by 0.02°C (0.04°F). May 2016 marks the 13th consecutive month a monthly global temperature record has been broken—the longest such streak since global temperature records began in 1880."

"The average global temperature across land surfaces was 1.29°C (2.32°F) higher than the 20th century average of 12.0°C (53.6°F)—the highest September global land temperature on record, besting the previous record set in 2015 by 0.11°C (0.20°F)."

"The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for October 2016 tied with 2003 as the third highest for October in the 137-year period of record, at 0.73°C (1.31°F) above the 20th century average of 14.0°C (57.1°F)."


Now will just one of you stupid fuckers present any evidence whatsoever that you have the slightest clue what the word "global" means in the phrase "global climate change"?

The phony weather 'anomaly' in your backyard is not relevant to the topic of "Damn you global warming!"

At this point AssClown Loser Boy Tool Insipid will hold forth without a single fact or reasoned argument, explaining like a piss ant that because I rubbed his nose in his own ignorance again, he somehow "won".
Go ahead, Loser Boy, dance impotently for us.
By Intrepid
#81437
Triggered!

Did I call it or what?

But thanks for wasting an hour or so of your otherwise empty day writing a bunch of blather nobody reads.
By Clownkicker
#81444
"At this point AssClown Loser Boy Tool Insipid will hold forth without a single fact or reasoned argument, explaining like a piss ant that because I rubbed his nose in his own ignorance again, he somehow "won"."-me

Did I call it or did I cal it. :lol: :lol:


I don't know what you're yammering about, Loser Boy. An hour? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Obviously you're really retarded and unable to use the internet.

I spent 5 minutes copy-and-pasting some facts from the internet.
Then I spent another 5 minutes rubbing your nose in it, just the way you like it.

And it is no surprise that you didn't read the facts I posted because everyone here knows facts and reason are anathema to your ilk. They are beyond your mental capabilities. Impotent sputtering hate and rantings are always the extent of your postings.
And notice how you couldn't refute a thing I said. :lol: :lol: :lol:

But at least your dancing on command showed us how you are completely owned and chronically ignorant by your own choice.
Way to go, Loser Boy. :lol: :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#81445
Trump claimed that global warming was a hoax.

Then Trump submitted a building permit to build a sea wall to protect his golf course from the effects of global warming!!!

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#81449
Trump claimed that global warming was a hoax.

Then Trump submitted a building permit to build a sea wall to protect his golf course from the effects of global warming!!!
Trump didn't submit a building permit, maybe one of his over 400 business did, why wouldn't they want to fight erosion?
By Clownkicker
#81450
Last year in December johnforbes was out running in 70+ degree weather in Virginia.
"TWO PERIODS OF UNSEASONABLE WARMTH HAVE MADE 2015 THE WARMEST
DECEMBER ON RECORD. THE FIRST WAS MID MONTH FROM THE 11TH THROUGH
THE 17TH...WITH AN EVEN MORE IMPRESSIVE STRETCH OCCURRING FROM THE
23RD THROUGH THE 29TH. THE CONSISTENCY OF THE WARMTH HAS BEEN
GREATEST NEAR THE COAST FROM ELIZABETH CITY TO NORFOLK AND
SALISBURY"-weather.gov

But did a single one of you clowns start threads about how that proved global warming? Of course not.
Last year your local weather was just local weather to you and you kept your mouths shut about the embarrassing heat wave.

Now this year you have a more typical December temperature for your area and suddenly you morons start threads about how your local weather disproves global :shock: warming, instead of it just being local weather like last year.

Funny how that works out so conveniently for you hypocrites.
By Intrepid
#81452
The emotion driven, knee jerk reactionary left always favors an outburst over calm, rational examination of those inconvenient truths.
1. Climate has always changed, and it always will. The assumption that prior to the industrial revolution the Earth had a "stable" climate is simply wrong. The only sensible thing to do about climate change is to prepare for it.

2. Accurate temperature measurements made from weather balloons and satellites since the late 1950s show no atmospheric warming since 1958. In contrast, averaged ground-based thermometers record a warming of about 0.40 C over the same time period. Many scientists believe that the thermometer record is biased by the Urban Heat Island effect and other artifacts.

3. Despite the expenditure of more than US$50 billion dollars looking for it since 1990, no unambiguous anthropocentric (human) signal has been identified in the global temperature pattern.


We will now experience an increase in the ambient temperature of the board due to another emotional outburst from the board's leading thrower of tantrums, AssClown Loser Marxist Tool.
4. Without the greenhouse effect, the average surface temperature on Earth would be -180 C rather than the equable +150 C that has nurtured the development of life.

Carbon dioxide is a minor greenhouse gas, responsible for ~26% (80 C) of the total greenhouse effect (330C), of which in turn at most 25% (~20C) can be attributed to carbon dioxide contributed by human activity. Water vapour, contributing at least 70% of the effect, is by far the most important atmospheric greenhouse gas.

5. On both annual (1 year) and geological (up to 100,000 year) time scales, changes in atmospheric temperature PRECEDE changes in CO2. Carbon dioxide therefore cannot be the primary forcing agent for temperature increase (though increasing CO2 does cause a diminishingly mild positive temperature feedback).

6. The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has acted as the main scaremonger for the global warming lobby that led to the Kyoto Protocol. Fatally, the IPCC is a political, not scientific, body.

Hendrik Tennekes, a retired Director of Research at the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, says that "the IPCC review process is fatally flawed" and that "the IPCC wilfully ignores the paradigm shift created by the foremost meteorologist of the twentieth century, Edward Lorenz".

7. The Kyoto Protocol will cost many trillions of dollars and exercises a significant impost those countries that signed it, but will deliver no significant cooling (less than .020 C by 2050, assuming that all commitments are met).


The Russian Academy of Sciences says that Kyoto has no scientific basis; Andre Illarianov, senior advisor to Russian president Putin, calls Kyoto-ism "one of the most agressive, intrusive, destructive ideologies since the collapse of communism and fascism". If Kyoto was a "first step" then it was in the same wrong direction as the later "Bali roadmap".

8. Climate change is a non-linear (chaotic) process, some parts of which are only dimly or not at all understood. No deterministic computer model will ever be able to make an accurate prediction of climate 100 years into the future.

9. Not surprisingly, therefore, experts in computer modelling agree also that no current (or likely near-future) climate model is able to make accurate predictions of regional climate change.

10. The biggest untruth about human global warming is the assertion that nearly all scientists agree that it is occurring, and at a dangerous rate.

The reality is that almost every aspect of climate science is the subject of vigorous debate. Further, thousands of qualified scientists worldwide have signed declarations which (i) query the evidence for hypothetical human-caused warming and (ii) support a rational scientific (not emotional) approach to its study within the context of known natural climate change.


LAYING TEN GLOBAL WARMING MYTHS


Myth 1 Average global temperature (AGT) has increased over the last few years.

Fact 1 Within error bounds, AGT has not increased since 1995 and has declined since 2002, despite an increase in atmospheric CO2 of 8% since 1995.

Myth 2 During the late 20th Century, AGT increased at a dangerously fast rate and reached an unprecedented magnitude.

Facts 2 The late 20th Century AGT rise was at a rate of 1-20 C/century, which lies well within natural rates of climate change for the last 10,000 yr. AGT has been several degrees warmer than today many times in the recent geological past.

Myth 3 AGT was relatively unchanging in pre-industrial times, has sky-rocketed since 1900, and will increase by several degrees more over the next 100 years (the Mann, Bradley & Hughes "hockey stick" curve and its computer extrapolation).

Facts 3 The Mann et al. curve has been exposed as a statistical contrivance. There is no convincing evidence that past climate was unchanging, nor that 20th century changes in AGT were unusual, nor that dangerous human warming is underway.

Myth 4 Computer models predict that AGT will increase by up to 60 C over the next 100 years.

Facts 4 Deterministic computer models do. Other equally valid (empirical) computer models predict cooling.

Myth 5 Warming of more than 20 C will have catastrophic effects on ecosystems and mankind alike.

Facts 5 A 20 C change would be well within previous natural bounds. Ecosystems have been adapting to such changes since time immemorial. The result is the process that we call evolution. Mankind can and does adapt to all climate extremes.

Myth 6 Further human addition of CO2 to the atmosphere will cause dangerous warming, and is generally harmful.

Facts 6 No human-caused warming can yet be detected that is distinct from natural system variation and noise. Any additional human-caused warming which occurs will probably amount to less than 10 C. Atmospheric CO2 is a beneficial fertilizer for plants, including especially cereal crops, and also aids efficient evapo-transpiration.

Myth 7 Changes in solar activity cannot explain recent changes in AGT.

Facts 7 The sun's output varies in several ways on many time scales (including the 11-, 22 and 80-year solar cycles), with concomitant effects on Earth's climate. While changes in visible radiation are small, changes in particle flux and magnetic field are known to exercise a strong climatic effect. More than 50% of the 0.80 C rise in AGT observed during the 20th century can be attributed to solar change.

Myth 8 Unprecedented melting of ice is taking place in both the north and south polar regions.

Facts 8 Both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are growing in thickness and cooling at their summit. Sea ice around Antarctica attained a record area in 2007. Temperatures in the Arctic region are just now achieving the levels of natural warmth experienced during the early 1940s, and the region was warmer still (sea-ice free) during earlier times.

Myth 9 Human-caused global warming is causing dangerous global sea-level (SL) rise.

Facts 9 SL change differs from time to time and place to place; between 1955 and 1996, for example, SL at Tuvalu fell by 105 mm (2.5 mm/yr). Global average SL is a statistical measure of no value for environmental planning purposes. A global average SL rise of 1-2 mm/yr occurred naturally over the last 150 years, and shows no sign of human-influenced increase.

Myth 10 The late 20th Century increase in AGT caused an increase in the number of severe storms (cyclones), or in storm intensity.

Facts 10 Meteorological experts are agreed that no increase in storms has occurred beyond that associated with natural variation of the climate system.


Robert M. Carter is a Research Professor at James Cook University (Queensland) and the University of Adelaide (South Australia). He is a palaeontologist, stratigrapher, marine geologist and environmental scientist with more than thirty years professional experience.


© Copyright Robert M. Carter, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia, 2009
By Clownkicker
#81459
Geezus, another outbreak of 'scarlet fever' from Scarlet Loser Boy Assclown Insipid. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You can see the drool dripping on his keyboard in every section of his commentary.

Well, I would spend an hour debunking his intentionally misleading propaganda screed---AGAIN----but he wouldn't read it anyway, as he is so fond of saying.
("Reading ISN'T fun"--sign on wall of Loser Boy insipid's home school room. :lol: :lol: :lol:)

But that's one of the finest spazz attacks I've induced in Scarlet Loser Boy Assclown Insipid.
He's so owned. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By Intrepid
#81462
Translation from AssClown Loser Marxist Tool lingo:
"In the face of facts, I got nothin."

Cue the silly ass word games from the AssClown.
By Clownkicker
#81464
What it means, Scarlet Loser Boy, is that I've got way more than you could read but I don't feel like wasting my time on you right now.

Admittedly, two paragraphs would be more than you could read, but I assure you I have at least three or four paragraphs that would shove your gullibility down your ignorant "useful tool" throat and make you choke. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
By tvd
#81472
Clownkicker wrote:What it means, Scarlet Loser Boy, is that I've got way more than you could read but I don't feel like wasting my time on you right now.
Hmmmmm.....interesting. I have told Clown many times that he is not worth my time to provide any form of refutation to his silly ideas. Not worth my time. He now insinuates that I have nothing, and that I am slinking away because I cannot debate him....my interpretation.

But look ^^^^^^^ He does the same thing to Intrepid....but it is OK for him to take that approach. Oh yeah, perfectly OK for him.....HYPOCRITE!!!!
By Clownkicker
#81475
"He now insinuates that I have nothing, and that I am slinking away because I cannot debate him...."-tvdummy

I'm not insinuating anything. I'm saying it flat out in so many words.
You have nothing and you slink away because you cannot debate me.
That's merely historical fact.

"But look ^^^^^^^ He does the same thing to Intrepid..."-tvdummy

No, I am not doing the same thing to Loser Boy Insipid. Not even remotely the same thing.
Loser Boy has told me many times that he does not read the long arguments I post. He has said this at least six times.
And I didn't say that I wouldn't destroy his propaganda screed sometime. Just that "I don't feel like wasting my time on you right now."
I am under no obligation to respond to him on his schedule. I respond when I feel like it and I do it frequently, unlike you who NEVER respond except for your incessant whining and moaning, and unlike Insipid who never addresses a single point I make.

You have said repeatedly that you won't refute the things I post.
He has said repeatedly that he won't read any long argument I post.
I, on the other hand, am ridiculed by you dishonest scum precisely because I DO debate you too often and waste too much time on you destroying your dimwitted, unsupported arguments.
And if I obliterated his idiotic post now when I know in advance that it's a waste of my time (just as you know it would be a waste of time because neither of you would refute a thing I post) he would only come back saying he didn't read it and that he "owned" me because I wasted the time on him.
So I have the option of choosing when I reply, which I, unlike you, do quite often.

See the difference yet?
By Intrepid
#81476
15350731_1701057080205683_423561313837957328_n.jpg
15350731_1701057080205683_423561313837957328_n.jpg (7.5 KiB) Viewed 10891 times
Triggered!

Another epic rant that nobody read.
User avatar
By tvd
#81481
Clownkicker wrote:
I, on the other hand, am ridiculed by you dishonest scum precisely because I DO debate you too often and waste too much time on you destroying your dimwitted, unsupported arguments.
He actually said this.^^^^^^^^^^...I cannot believe it.

No, sir, that is incorrect, I, for one, ridicule you because you are so fucking wrong on every subject that comes up, it is worthy of such ridicule. That's why I ridicule you.

I am on to you. I know exactly what you are up to, and why you post. It ain't working on me.
By Clownkicker
#81482
"... I, for one, ridicule you because you are so fucking wrong on every subject that comes up,..."-tvdunce

But you can never demonstrate that anything I say is wrong, while you pretend everything I said is wrong, so it should be easy. Post a few facts, a few rational arguments.
Instead, you just whine and run away, like now.

You're spending your time whining about me instead of talking about Loser Boy's idiotic claim that one week's regional weather disproves global warming.
By johnforbes
#81485
I have forwarded Clown's remarks to a neutral factchecker.

The verdict:

Clown's assertions are:

a) Wrong.

b) Very wrong.

c) Erroneous.

d) Mistaken.

e) Naive.

x) Quixotic.

y) Frivolous.

z) Delusional.
User avatar
By tvd
#81528
Clownkicker wrote:"... I, for one, ridicule you because you are so fucking wrong on every subject that comes up,..."-tvdunce

But you can never demonstrate that anything I say is wrong, while you pretend everything I said is wrong, so it should be easy. Post a few facts, a few rational arguments.
Instead, you just whine and run away, like now.

You're spending your time whining about me instead of talking about Loser Boy's idiotic claim that one week's regional weather disproves global warming.

What the hell don't you understand? I am NOT going to engage you in discussion PERIOD. You are a fucking know it all, so what is the point?
By Clownkicker
#81529
That's what I said, you whine and then run away.

So I will discuss a topic when I feel like doing so, like I said, because you and Loser Boy are simply angry, impotent pussies.
Why would I waste my time when I don't feel like it?

Thanks for backing me up on this, tvdummy.
By Clownkicker
#81533
tvd, you show up on threads just to let everyone know you aren't going to contribute anything to the discussion.
And then you get pissed at me for contributing something that you can never seem to find fault with.

How fucked up is that?
By elklindo69
#81539
RealJustme wrote:
Trump claimed that global warming was a hoax.

Then Trump submitted a building permit to build a sea wall to protect his golf course from the effects of global warming!!!
Trump didn't submit a building permit, maybe one of his over 400 business did, why wouldn't they want to fight erosion?
Trump claimed that global warming is a hoax.

I suppose Trump will fire the employee who filed the permit to fight against global warming...

:lol:
By Clownkicker
#81552
I believe it was Gregor Samsa who thought life couldn't get worse than when he awoke one morning as a 5'8" cockroach.

Then johnforbes stopped by and Gregor's spirits underwent a profound metamorphosis of perspective.
Gregor suddenly realized it could in fact be much worse; that some people go through life as even bigger cockroaches.
By johnforbes
#82161
I once clicked on a link from Clowntoker.

For a time, there was silence, then an ominous hissing, then a mushroom **** formed over the blazing corpus of what once was my CPU.
By sillydaddy
#82201
Since climate change prophets are telling us that sea levels will rise because of global warming...
Let's start putting out the word that all waterfront property is now worthless.....
and watch how quickly all this climate change bullshit goes away.. :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#82203
This global warming apparently not stopping Trump from building a sea wall at one of his golf courses.

Claiming on the building permit...protection from global warming!!!

:lol:
By sillydaddy
#82205
Elk...no Trump is not building the wall....
The Trump organization in Ireland listed that as the reason to protect the shoreline near the course figuring
it would be the path of least resistance but....
Evidently, even the environmentalists don't believe in it...
because they protested to prevent the building of the wall and won! :o
By Intrepid
#82209
On Drudge right now:

Average U.S. temperature- 11 degrees.

Need some of that global warming. Been below zero every night and most days last two weeks.
User avatar
By tvd
#82211
I can post links too.

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://yournewswire.com/tens-of-thousan ... ge-a-hoax/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_wa ... acy_theory" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.naturalnews.com/055151_globa ... icism.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-2 ... am-exposed" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
By Clownkicker
#82212
Yes, but my links contain actual facts, dummy, not conspiracy theories.
It's also a hoot that you posted the Wikipedia article about the lies of climate change deniers. :lol: :lol:

If you want high temperatures, maybe you should go to the Arctic, Loser Boy.

Temps have been 30 to 50 degrees above normal there.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/arti ... ing-crazy/


Oh, I copied the wrong link for South America in the previous post. Try this one instead.
https://watchers.news/2016/12/15/chile- ... mber-2016/
By Intrepid
#82215
The AssClown looser Marxist Tool Loose Canon can post links nobody clicks but he cannot refute a single word of my post of November 6th.
By Clownkicker
#82217
Of course nobody can refute Loser Boy Insipid's "post of November 6th" because he's too stupid to understand that his first post on this thread was on December 19th. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
And I easily refuted that one immediately. Fucking Loser Boy Ignoramus Insipid.

But no one here even tried to refute my posts of Dec. 19th or Dec. 20th because they couldn't.
Then, when I post links to news reports to answer direct questions they pose, they all refuse to even read them.
That's how averse to facts they all are.

How did climate change deniers get so stupid and impotent? :lol:
By Intrepid
#82223
No AssClown, nobody refutes anything you post because nobody reads anything you post.

But you read everything I post because you are owned and must read everything I post.

I jerk your leash and you perform.
Every. Single. Time.
User avatar
By tvd
#82224
Yep....even when he posts that he has no more time to WASTE on your posts,
he cannot stand it, and MINUTES LATER must come back to hit it again.

Usually at 4 in the morning.

Much like his bong.
By Clownkicker
#82225
^^^^ See? These morons get caught in their glaring stupidity and all they can do is declare victory.
"post of November 6th" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

They've given up entirely on discussing the topic because they have been made fools of.

Every. Single. Time. :lol: :lol: :lol:
By johnforbes
#82228
It was 6 F at dawn where I was this morning.

My fingers -- bronzed and muscular though they are -- were nonetheless slightly chilly.
By Intrepid
#82229
15895051_1226168704164413_3352836507544851661_n.jpg
15895051_1226168704164413_3352836507544851661_n.jpg (54.83 KiB) Viewed 10619 times
The AssClown wears out several keyboards every year by pounding the keys in an attempt to emphasize his weak, impotent posts. This is a picture of his newest model.
By Clownkicker
#82230
^^^^^^ It's always pathetic to see a group of grown men just whimper and give up.

Not even groping for the dignity of trying to defend their unsupportable positions. :(
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

#