Political discussions about everything
User avatar
By RealJustme
#80396
Well Hillary has decided to join Jill Stein in demanding recounts in the election. There is no doubt this whole move was part of the Clinton machine. Hillary just put all her money on the poker table in an attempt to take out Da Donald even after he tried playing nice.

After this is over expect Da Donald to tell (his) DOJ "fully hold the Clinton's accountable to ALL laws"

Pass the popcorn, I was happy knowing Hillary wouldn't be President but now I get a chance to see her in an orange pants suit.
By sillydaddy
#80397
Hillary is always biting the hand that feeds her.....
Trump said he was going to leave her alone...even though he has no official say in the matter..
chances are his AG would have left her alone......
But now she's doing the same thing she did when Comey let her off the hook!
She will leave Trump on choice.....
By Clownkicker
#80401
"Well Hillary has decided to join Jill Stein in demanding recounts in the election."-RealTool

Tool, when your first sentence is a lie, it makes your entire post a waste of time.

Try again, and this time get your information from someone NOT your usual handlers.
By elklindo69
#80421
Trump posts this canard on Twitter;

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally


Then goes on to criticize the election recount as "sad."

I never knew Trump could pile bullshit so high!!!

:lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#80422
Then goes on to criticize the election recount as "sad."
Even CCN gets it. Tara Setmayer is a CNN political commentator and she questioned if the recounts were really about insuring there was no cheating, why only the three States Trump won, why not any of the close States that Hillary won?

Bingo!
By johnforbes
#80425
Jill has done a brilliant thing for Jill -- now all her bills are paid.

Hillary joined in because she apparently may run for mayor of NY.

If Wisconsin went for Hillary, or Michigan, Hillary would STILL not win. The margin is too much in PA, so the outcome is not going to change.
User avatar
By Malcolm
#80429
Jill Stein posted to her Jill2016 website that she had raised enough money to “file” for a recount in Pennsylvania. However, the Green Party candidate left out some key details about the filing of recounts in Pennsylvania that many of her supporters likely would have wanted to know before donating. For example, candidates cannot file a direct request for a recount in the state and instead must appeal the election in court.

http://tinyurl.com/zecc9dp
http://tinyurl.com/hhrsdfz
http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=10451 :shock:
By Clownkicker
#80430
"...why not any of the close States that Hillary won?"-RealTool

What "close States" are those, Tool?
Please be so good as to list them and include the vote counts for each candidate. :lol:


Yeah, that's what I thought...

Bingo!
User avatar
By RealJustme
#80455
What "close States" are those, Tool?
Please be so good as to list them and include the vote counts for each candidate.
Clinton barely won Nevada by less than 27K votes. She won Colorado, a state with millions of voters, by less than 75K votes. In Minnesota, a state with nearly 3 million votes cast, Clinton won by less than 44K votes. In New Hampshire Hillary Clinton won by less than 3,000 votes. Now don't you feel silly ;)
User avatar
By RealJustme
#80459
Tool, winning by 2.5% in Nevada, 3% in Colorado, and 1.5% in Minnesota is not "close" you moron.
Less than half a percent in Michigan is "close".
Typical libtard, you can't do basic math.

Here's another bitch slap ;)

"Anyone that refuses to accept the results of an election are not only dangerous, but a threat to our very democracy"

-Hillary Rodham Clinton 3rd Presidential debate
#80463
Tool, Hillary "accepted the results of the election" on November 9th when she phoned Trump and congratulated him for winning.

As to recounts, every voter should want to know that the elections were tabulated correctly.
In a perfect world, every vote tally would be done at least twice as a check. But that costs money.

Don't despair, some day you might be able to do percentages if you apply yourself.
First it helps to learn to count to one hundred. :lol:


I guess you're the one who got bitch slapped on that one, Tool, as usual. :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#80494
Libtards melting down every where you look, it's a great time to be an American. Hillary's (oh Jill's :lol: ) call for recounts has unraveled. A large portion of the money donated to Jill for the recount came from Clinton's slush fund which is millions more than the recount will cost and Jill will be able to bank that surplus. In other words Jill was paid millions to demand the recount by the Clinton machine. Deception and corruption is a Clinton hallmark, Jill is just a greedy wacko.
By johnforbes
#80498
Yep, those millions were far more than Jill ever got for her campaign.

Hillary is just trying to placate the Left so she can remain relevant and run for NY mayor and continue the corruption of the Clinton Foundation.
By sillydaddy
#80539
So Hillary is the only Presidential candidate to get the largest margin of popular vote in the history of the nation

And still manage not win the Presidency.....

Nothing to be proud of... libetards.. :lol: :lol:
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

#