[elklindo69]

Trump flip flopped on Obamacare.

Trump flip flopped on building a wall

Trump said Hillary was a criminal and she should be locked up.

Not so anymore!

Donald Trump is meeting with the New York Times, and Times media reporter Mike Grynbaum is live tweeting the on-the-record portion of the meeting.

In the meeting Donald Trump was asked whether he had ruled out prosecuting Hillary Clinton. “It’s just not something I feel strongly about,” Mr. Trump told the room, according to Grynbaum.

Let's see if this makes headlines on Breitbart or Drudge........................

:lol:

[RealJustme]

Trump isn't even office yet! Give him a couple of years, especially after he has total control of the Supreme Court, libtards are in for a hard ride for the next 8 years.

[Intrepid]

Because you are stupid Elkindoofus I'll explain it to you.
Trump won't prosecute Killery. He can't.

Trey Gowdy on the other hand can.
With or without Trump's approval.

Let that chew on your guts for a while.

[Intrepid]

And then there's the ongoing FBI investigation of the Clinton Global Shakedown Foundation. Trump has no input there either other to shitcan Comey on his first day as president.
That's where the real dirt lies.

[RealJustme]

Because you are stupid Elkindoofus I'll explain it to you.
Trump won't prosecute Killery. He can't.

Exactly, Trump can't prosecute anyone, he is just stating a fact, he said nothing about stopping the already ongoing investigations of the Clintons.

I had one of my knuckle head workers today all pissed that Trump wasn't going to prosecute Hillary, had to laugh my ass off.

[johnforbes]

It'll be interesting to see whether Sessions would appoint a special prosecutor.

And whether Trump would ask Comey (FBI head has a 10-year appt) to resign in order to try to restore the reputation of the FBI, which now is not trusted by Dems or Repubs.

[elklindo69]

Because you are stupid Elkindoofus I'll explain it to you.
Trump won't prosecute Killery. He can't.

Exactly, Trump can't prosecute anyone, he is just stating a fact, he said nothing about stopping the already ongoing investigations of the Clintons.

I had one of my knuckle head workers today all pissed that Trump wasn't going to prosecute Hillary, had to laugh my ass off.

Trump said during the debate that he would appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillary.

So you are telling me that Trump's a liar, ignorant, or both.

:lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MGe0QY1jsg

[RealJustme]

Trump said during the debate that he would appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillary.

What makes you think he won't?

[elklindo69]

Trump said during the debate that he would appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillary.

What makes you think he won't?

He said he was.

Now he said he won't.

Do think he will change his mind again and appoint a special prosecutor to go after Hillary! Or do take is word for it? That is, he will flip flop on the original flip flop.

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol:

[Intrepid]

15192687_10153750296141324_6501161563317011134_n.jpg (33.31 KiB) Viewed 4023 times

[johnforbes]

It is a little too early to say.

Loretta Lynch has blocked 4 local FBI offices who have been investigating the Clinton Foundation.

If, for example, Gowdy became AG, it seems unlikely he would block them.

Should there be a special prosecutor to look into the pay to play at the State Dept? Yes, but not because Hillary is a Democrat. Nobody should sell access like that.

[RealJustme]

Now he said he won't.

He said he won't "personally" prosecute Hillary, if you think Da Donald is going to stop the federal investigations and Sessions is going to sweep their findings under the carpet you're crazy.

You can bet Lynch and the 300 special civil rights prosecutors "she" hired are wiping some computers as I type. That operation was nothing but a hit mob for the liberal agenda.

Here's the lastest example:

The Denver Sheriff’s Department set out to hire scores of deputies last year to lessen the burden on its staff and cut millions in overtime.

It advertised for prospects, and included U.S. citizenship as a requirement.

By this past spring, it had hired 200 deputies.

The Justice Department did not congratulate the agency – instead, it slapped Colorado’s largest sheriff’s department with a $10,000 fine and a host of steps it must take to address what was described as discriminatory hiring.

In a summary of the settlement on its website, the Justice Department said that in insisting on citizenship, the Denver Sheriff’s Department violated an anti-discrimination provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) that forbids employers from hiring only U.S. citizens except in cases where it is mandated “by law, regulation, executive order or government contract.”

[RealJustme]

Lynch's latest batch of DOJ prosecutors just started this week and her "announced" goal is to insure there are no empty prosecutor or investigator slots left when Trump takes over.

DOJ.JPG (88.38 KiB) Viewed 4012 times

[johnforbes]

Yep, the goal is to assure enough black female liberal Democrats that the Clinton Foundation's corruption will go untouched.

[johnforbes]

On the plus side, I will make time for the gal on the far left to try to persuade her.

Perhaps a trip to Jamaica could change her politics?

[Clownkicker]

johnny, stop.

Everyone's not a whore like you.

[Intrepid]

All you libtards are being played like the fish you are by your lamestream media prophets.
How well did they serve you in the election?
You Idiots never learn.

[johnforbes]

Clown, I'm simply being reasonable.

That gal is attractive, and I'd give her an opportunity to discuss policy.