[elklindo69]

In a phone call to NBC’s “Today” program Friday morning after this article appeared online, Trump denied that he was John Miller. “No, I don’t think it — I don’t know anything about it. You’re telling me about it for the first time and it doesn’t sound like my voice at all,” he said. “I have many, many people that are trying to imitate my voice and then you can imagine that, and this sounds like one of the scams, one of the many scams — doesn’t sound like me.” Later, he was more definitive: “It was not me on the phone. And it doesn’t sound like me on the phone, I will tell you that, and it was not me on the phone. And when was this? Twenty-five years ago?”

Then, Friday afternoon, Washington Post reporters who were 44 minutes into a phone interview with Trump about his finances asked him a question about Miller: “Did you ever employ someone named John Miller as a spokesperson?”

The phone went silent, then dead. When the reporters called back and reached Trump’s secretary, she said, “I heard you got disconnected. He can’t take the call now. I don’t know what happened.”

Trump has never been terribly adamant about denying that he often made calls to reporters posing as someone else. From his earliest years in business, he occasionally called reporters using the name “John Barron.”



https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... &tid=ss_tw

[johnforbes]

The Post has 20 reporters assigned to dig up dirt on Trump.

None assigned to dig into the lies about Benghazi or Hillary's classified email.

[Clownkicker]

Benghazi has been investigated by Congress and Republicans something like nine times now, johnny, and every time the Administration was cleared of any wrongdoing.

Why would a paper waste resources on that tired old saw any longer?
It's time you get a clue, finally.

In fact, go watch the movie that Trump was regaling us with until we suddenly heard nothing else about it from him.
That's because the movie timeline shows how the deaths couldn't have been prevented regardless of what the White House did once the attacks started.

Sometimes you just have to face reality and let it go, dummy.

[RealJustme]

The big question is has Trump ever exposed the names of our under cover operatives or our nation's most secret operations to our enemies? There was a time that doing so would result in the death penalty.

[monkeykoys]

I love donald trumph. I wish he can change america, Make the dollar higher.. God bless america.

[Intrepid]

Trouble is AssClown Loser Lucky the pathetic cripple, Everyone pleaded with State in the months leading up to the attack for increased security. During the opening minutes of the attack the security contractors, former Marines, SEALs, Army Rangers, were ready within minutes to go to the aid of the Ambassador and embassy personnel but were prevented from dong so by "Bob" the chief of mission. Eventually they just said, "Fuck Bob" and went anyway, but by then it was too late.

Fucking "Bob" was eventually given an award for valor by the State Dept.

There was a drone overhead during the attack sending video back to DC. That drone could have easily been an AC 130 Specter gunship that could have ended the event within minutes. Of course, that option would have left scattered body parts all over the landscape. And as we all know, Obozo is loath to annoy, let alone kill his fellow muzzies.

You can keep vomiting up the pablum fed you by your hero Hil-LIE-ry the lying lesbian cunt who constantly lies out of her lying lie hole, but nobody is buying it except you Useful Idiots.

[Clownkicker]

It was nice of Reactionary Pinky Boy Assclown Loser Insipid to stop by to exonerate Hillary and Obama.

Even Loser Boy I'mStupid tells us that the decision was made by "Bob" (CIA) to hold off ten minutes before sending help. There's nothing Hillary or Obama could have done to save him.
The Ambassador was dead within twenty minutes of the start of the attack. There was no way to prevent his death after that 10 minute delay. And it's arguable that even if the team had been sent immediately, they could not have prevented the fire that killed the Ambassador. It would have been consuming the house by the time the team arrived, and they would still have had to fight their way in.
To say the closest rescue team, even if sent immediately, could have saved the three men is pure unsupportable speculation.

Meanwhile, it was the Ambassador himself who minimized his security on a daily basis. That day he had specifically refused to have a large security team travel with him. Even if there had been more troops at the Embassy, they couldn't have protected the house without an okay from the Ambassador. It was too far away. Loser Boy Assclown Insipid simply overlooks this fact conveniently.

Why in the world would there have been a gunship in the air for no reason, dummy?
This was not the Embassy (as the way Right Wing tools keep lying) and it wasn't even the number two safe house for the Ambassador, which was reasonably secure. It was a third, not-very-secure house with very little defense. That call was made by the Ambassador himself. He knew its vulnerability.

But thanks again for clearing up that neither Hillary nor Obama did anything wrong that day, Loser Boy.
johnforbes appreciates the education. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[elklindo69]

The big question is has Trump ever exposed the names of our under cover operatives or our nation's most secret operations to our enemies? There was a time that doing so would result in the death penalty.

When House Republicans called a hearing in the middle of their long recess, you knew it would be something big, and indeed it was: They accidentally blew the CIA’s cover.

The purpose of Wednesday’s hearing of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee was to examine security lapses that led to the killing in Benghazi last month of the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three others. But in doing so, the lawmakers reminded us why “congressional intelligence” is an oxymoron.

Through their outbursts, cryptic language and boneheaded questioning of State Department officials, the committee members left little doubt that one of the two compounds at which the Americans were killed, described by the administration as a “consulate” and a nearby “annex,” was a CIA base. They did this, helpfully, in a televised public hearing.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was the first to unmask the spooks. “Point of order! Point of order!” he called out as a State Department security official, seated in front of an aerial photo of the U.S. facilities in Benghazi, described the chaotic night of the attack. “We’re getting into classified issues that deal with sources and methods that would be totally inappropriate in an open forum such as this.”

A State Department official assured him that the material was “entirely unclassified” and that the photo was from a commercial satellite. “I totally object to the use of that photo,” Chaffetz continued. He went on to say that “I was told specifically while I was in Libya I could not and should not ever talk about what you’re showing here today.”

Now that Chaffetz had alerted potential bad guys that something valuable was in the photo, the chairman, Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), attempted to lock the barn door through which the horse had just bolted. “I would direct that that chart be taken down,” he said, although it already had been on C-SPAN. “In this hearing room, we’re not going to point out details of what may still in fact be a facility of the United States government or more facilities.”

May still be a facility? The plot thickened — and Chaffetz gave more hints. “I believe that the markings on that map were terribly inappropriate,” he said, adding that “the activities there could cost lives.”

In their questioning and in the public testimony they invited, the lawmakers managed to disclose, without ever mentioning Langley directly, that there was a seven-member “rapid response force” in the compound the State Department was calling an annex. One of the State Department security officials was forced to acknowledge that “not necessarily all of the security people” at the Benghazi compounds “fell under my direct operational control.”

[johnforbes]

Elkin has blown many things...

[RealJustme]

So clown, what does Trump have to do with the Oversight and Government Reform Committee?

[Intrepid]

You dipshit AssClown Loser Lucky the pathetic cripple, CIA "Bob" was on the phone with the State Dept. aka Hillary, as she dithered and dallied while the attack gained force and more enemy fighters arrived every minute. Nobody would give the order to come to the aid of the Ambassador and other embassy personnel so they died like dogs while Killery couldn't pull her thumb out of her ass. What did arrive was the unarmed drone to video the entire debacle.
Americans died and Killery lied.

Read something besides Google sometime you crippled shit weasel.

[johnforbes]

The quantity of investigations doesn't matter. What matters is the truth about who allowed 4 brave men to die in Benghazi.

We already know Rice, Obama, and Hillary lied about a video being the cause.

We know from Hilly's email to her daughter and the Egyptian PM that she said a video had nothing to do with it.

She lied because Obama had been saying terrorism was "on the run" and terrorism in Benghazi ran counter to that campaign theme.

[RealJustme]

When there's a national crisis Obama doesn't huddle with military or law enforcement leaders on how to best to protect and inform the public, he huddles with clueless wits who's only talent is spinning the situation to protect him.