[johnforbes]

Has there ever been a candidate who made clear his position on such a wide array of issues as Trump?

From China's currency manipulation, to the national debt, to border security, to our now-pallid GDP growth, to the failures of nation-building as a foreign policy under Dems and Repubs, to tax rates (including more taxes on himself), to health care savings accounts, to repealing Obamacare, to ending sanctuary cities, the list is almost endless of the actual policy positions...

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[RealJustme]

I started out being a Trump skeptic but his honest straight forward no bullshit positions have sold me over. America was a waiting for a real man to step forward and finally we have one. Libtards and public leaches are scared shitless there will be accountability and no more special protections.

[johnforbes]

Clownhicker didn't understand that my post related not to whether leftists concur with Trump.

They don't.

But to whether Trump has laid out his positions on a very wide array of issues.

He has.

So, when critics say Trump is just popular and has not dug into specific issues, they are just wrong.

Also, Trump has a very long record of business success. Unlike Barry O, who was a "community organizer" who, when he became president, had a personal net worth under 1 million.

So Barry's resume was very, very thin by comparison.

He was, after all, elected to law review as one of its affirmative action members. He didn't earn it with academic work.

[sillydaddy]

Yep...you certainly reduced Clown to bare emoticons!

[sillydaddy]

Yep...you certainly reduced Clown to bare emoticons!

[Grog]

And it got simple Silly so excited he stuttered.

I would agree that Trump is the most substantiative conservative candidate ever. His IQ is at least 90, maybe 91, a solid five-six points higher than say, Forrest Gump, which makes Trump Leader of the GOP Pack, including Reagan who was probably 86-87.

It's probably time to get rid of vastly higher IQ Dems and elect Trump as a man of the Ignorati. :lol:

[johnforbes]

Grog's net worth stands at an impressive $34.98. At least before his next beer run to 7/11.

Trump's IQ is likely 70 to 80 points higher than Grog's.

[Grog]

Last I tested a few years back, I was around 120 or so. There is no way in the real world that Trump is more than low nineties. That's a real world fact.

[Intrepid]

Then Grog's net worth should be comparatively higher than Trump's.

It isn't, and that's a real world fact.

Trump also attracts hot shikshas and Grog can't get laid in a whore house with Benjamins sticking out of every pocket.

And THAT is a real world fact.

[Grog]

So JustFreedManIntrepidMe believes there is a direct correlation between intelligence and wealth?

In his case that may by true and thus explains why Paris Hilton is exponentially smarter and wealthier than he is.

Yet another Real World fact. :lol:

[Intrepid]

You ignorant Canadian Hebe. Paris Hilton inherited her wealth. You inherited nothing but a desire for hot shikshas that won't even give you a second glance.

Want more Jewboy?

[Grog]

Well, there you go. Thank goodness Trump didn't inherit anything. He made it the old fashioned way; he inherited it. Wait... :lol:

[Intrepid]

He was given 1M. Turned that into 10BN.
Given you are a money grubbing Yid, that has to catch your attention.
You got shit.
Well, you don't even have that. After all, Tori wouldn't let you even sniff her enormous asshole.

Want more Hebe? I can keep bringing the pain as long as you can stand it.

Fuck that...much, MUCH longer.

[Grog]

Of course it was only 1m. Probably not even that much. Probably 1k or -1k.

You're so harsh, JustFreedManIntrepidMe! :lol:

[Intrepid]

Got any gelt in your teeth Jewboy? After I'm done with you I might rip it out. You may be worth something after all.

Arbeit Macht Frei bitches.

[Grog]

Wow! You're quite a tough and violent Internet tough guy! Yikes! :lol:

[Intrepid]

You got nothing Yid.

I proved it again you tedious punk bitch.

Must be some ethnic thing. Why else would 6 million people march into the showers and not put up a fight?
Perhaps they improved the species by leaving?
You could help out too Grog.
End it now Loser.
Tori doesn't even remember your name.
Word up Hebe.

[Grog]

It's interesting that you're pretty laid back when you post as Justme, but when you log in under "Intrepid" you become so virulently anti-semitic and violently threatening.

Why do you think that is?

[Clownkicker]

"From China's currency manipulation"-johnforbes
There's nothing Trump can do about it. China will do as they like as long as they hold our debt.
Saying China's currency manipulation is bad is hardly a "substantive" policy.

"to the national debt"-johnforbes
There isn't a reputable economist who believes Trump's 'solution' to the debt can work. Not one. Not even a Republican one.

"to our now-pallid GDP growth,"-johnforbes
There's not a thing he can do about it.

"to tax rates (including more taxes on himself)"-johnforbes
When Warren Buffett said taxes should be raised on guys like himself, you called him a hypocrite and poo-pooed him.
Now when Trump says it, you call it a "substantive" policy. :lol:
Well, Trump is also free to pay more in taxes now, just like you said Buffet could.
You're just another partisan hypocrite, as always, johnny.

"to repealing Obamacare"-johnforbes
There's nothing Trump can do to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
And even if he could, he offers nothing to replace it.
That's his "substantive" policy; to take health insurance away from the poorest among us.
And health care savings accounts are only realistic for the upper middle class and wealthy people, and they certainly aren't his idea. They've been proposed for years.
He's got nothing for those who need help the most.

"the list is almost endless of the actual policy positions..."-johnforbes
You're right, johnny, he has an almost endless list of policy positions, most of which are hollow stump speach promises and don't mean anything. The actual policy positions consist of nothing but soundbites criticizing the status quo and silly unworkable opinions that have nothing to do with the real world.

Trump is the least "substantive" candidate we've had in at least 40 years.
And he's less experienced than Obama was in politics. You still criticize Obama's lack of experience to be President, but for some reason NO experience whatsoever is now fine with you dimwits.
Trump is less "substantive" that all of the other Republicans who ran this time around.

Now I command Assclown Loser Insipid to provide us with some fourth rate entertainment of spitting, sputtering, and spastic dancing for us again.

[johnforbes]

It would seem that Clownslobber has posted a manifesto above.

Called, perhaps, Das Anti-Kapital.

Who would read that much socialist drivel from Clownslobber?

[tvd]

It's interesting that you're pretty laid back when you post as Justme, but when you log in under "Intrepid" you become so virulently anti-semitic and violently threatening.

Why do you think that is?

Because they are two different individuals Grog. Why do you insist that everyone is multi-nicking?

Is it because YOU are doing it?

[tvd]

"From China's currency manipulation"-johnforbes
There's nothing Trump can do about it. China will do as they like as long as they hold our debt.
Saying China's currency manipulation is bad is hardly a "substantive" policy.

"to the national debt"-johnforbes
There isn't a reputable economist who believes Trump's 'solution' to the debt can work. Not one. Not even a Republican one.

"to our now-pallid GDP growth,"-johnforbes
There's not a thing he can do about it.

"to tax rates (including more taxes on himself)"-johnforbes
When Warren Buffett said taxes should be raised on guys like himself, you called him a hypocrite and poo-pooed him.
Now when Trump says it, you call it a "substantive" policy. :lol:
Well, Trump is also free to pay more in taxes now, just like you said Buffet could.
You're just another partisan hypocrite, as always, johnny.

"to repealing Obamacare"-johnforbes
There's nothing Trump can do to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
And even if he could, he offers nothing to replace it.
That's his "substantive" policy; to take health insurance away from the poorest among us.
And health care savings accounts are only realistic for the upper middle class and wealthy people, and they certainly aren't his idea. They've been proposed for years.
He's got nothing for those who need help the most.

"the list is almost endless of the actual policy positions..."-johnforbes
You're right, johnny, he has an almost endless list of policy positions, most of which are hollow stump speach promises and don't mean anything. The actual policy positions consist of nothing but soundbites criticizing the status quo and silly unworkable opinions that have nothing to do with the real world.

Trump is the least "substantive" candidate we've had in at least 40 years.
And he's less experienced than Obama was in politics. You still criticize Obama's lack of experience to be President, but for some reason NO experience whatsoever is now fine with you dimwits.
Trump is less "substantive" that all of the other Republicans who ran this time around.

Now I command Assclown Loser Insipid to provide us with some fourth rate entertainment of spitting, sputtering, and spastic dancing for us again.

The preceding informative announcement was brought to you by Google, the GO TO source for those that know everything. For additional information it is recommended that you consult Yahoo Answers, or in a pinch, Ask.com.
Thank you.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^See, RealTool, THAT is a Freudian slip.


By saying I found all that information on Google, tvd inadvertently let slip that he believes I know what I'm talking about and that my post is correct. By implication,(<---look it up, dummies) if my post is based on actual information, then johnforbes' post must be wrong.

tvd has already known this about me for months, of course, because he can never refute a thing I say. But he would never admit it until he did it unintentionally just now.

In trying to insult me, he instead vindicated me and insulted johnforbes, which reflects his true feelings. :lol:

[johnforbes]

Other than minimal time as a college instructor part-time, and a nothing tenure as an Illinois state legislator, Barry O had accomplished nothing.

His wife got some hospital PR type gig after he became a senator -- presumably, a pay-for-access to a politician thing akin to the notion of the Clinton Foundation.

Obama's net worth was under 1 million when he became president.

He had never built or run a business, employed nobody but a few staff sycophants, and he didn't even grow up in America but in Indonesia and then a private school in Hawaii.

His influences were Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers -- ultra Left Wing nuts.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^There goes johnforbes, "Google"ing stuff again, tvd.

Aren't you going to jump all over him about that? :lol:

[tvd]

He is not as blatant as you are at it. Nobody and I mean nobody can be an expert at everything like you try to make out.

[elklindo69]

Trump a substantive candidate?

Hahaaaa that's a good one Johnnie Boy!

:lol:

[RealJustme]

By saying I found all that information on Google, tvd inadvertently let slip that he believes I know what I'm talking about and that my post is correct.

Clown, you google for leftist talking points for your posts, they are from correct, that's why you end up getting spanked when it comes to laying out the facts and basis for the discussion.

[Clownkicker]

"they are from correct,"-RealTool

There you go, Tool.
That's a Freudian slip. :lol:

[tvd]

So now typos have become Freudian slips....good one Sigmoid...good one.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^ tvd has completely lost his sense of humor.

So sad.


By the way, tvd, I didn't consult a search engine for any of my post.

I really can't help it if I know stuff. Sorry you don't. :lol:

[sillydaddy]

Yet....Clown is always asking for a link to anything posted......

Nothing is valid to Clown unless it can found on the internet ....go figure :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

sillydaddy, you're confusing "valid" with "factual".
I wouldn't brag and laugh about being a gullible tool if I were you.

Intelligent people don't simply swallow all the propaganda posted on the internet the way you do, silly.
We are talking about current events, and anything current we talk about is on the internet, even if it is only on reactionary Right Wing sites were RealTool gets all his ridiculous propaganda.
That's where he got it, we should all be able to read it.

Do I ask for evidence to back up absurd claims before I accept them at face value?
Yes, I do, and I'm proud of it.
You don't. You believe everything RealTool says (even after it has been proved he is lying) because it supports your narrow world view, and that makes you a fool.

[RealJustme]

You believe everything RealTool says (even after it has been proved he is lying) because it supports your narrow world view, and that makes you a fool.

From the person who has his so far up Hillary's ass he blindly supporters no matter what she does. Now watch clown claim he doesn't care for Hillary but she's innocent of all right wing allegations.

[tvd]

From the person who has his so far up Hillary's ass he blindly supporters no matter what she does.

Look at all the Sigmiodian slips in that sentence!!!! SigmoidClown, JUMP!!!! ATTACK!!!!

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ What a fucking imbecile. :lol:

[sillydaddy]

Factual?? Facts mean nothing to Clown if they're not to his liking :lol: :lol:

[johnforbes]

Elkin boy can't admit Barry O had a very thin resume -- a law instructor part-time, a nothing tenure as a legislator in IL, a young leftist with radical associates such as Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, and Bill Ayers.

There was little to recommend Barry other than his bloated ego, and sadly today his tenure has been a failure.

[Clownkicker]

Now take a moment (and I mean "a moment") to enumerate Trump's many qualifications, johnny.

Would you say Trump has a bloated ego, too? Of course he does. He's famous for it and even uses it as a trade mark. So why are you pretending Obama's bloated ego was so terrible but Trump's isn't?
Was Trump ever a lawyer or law instructor? No. He has less knowledge of the Constitution than Obama did.
Was he ever a legislator of any kind? No. He has less experience than Obama did.
Was he ever a community organizer? No. He has less experience than Obama did.
Does he have any experience whatsoever in government? No. He has less experience than Obama did.
Did Obama go bankrupt four times? No.
Did Obama use his name on a scam university to rip off hundreds of students? No.
Did Obama run many failed businesses like casinos, the ridiculous Trump Steaks, and Trump Vodka fiascos? No.
Has Obama been divorced twice and married three times? No.

Does Trump think he can run the government the way he runs a private corporation? Yes.
And that in itself should let you clowns understand that he doesn't know what he's doing.
And why is his academic career at Wharton shrouded in mystery, johnny? Where are his transcripts? Where are his SAT scores?
And why don't any of his classmates remember him after four years together?

Lacking all relevant experience, there are only two attributes Trump actually has that you clowns believe qualify him to be President.
1. He made money and ripped off investors multiple times.
2. He bloviates better than anyone else.

All johnforbes can do is list why he thinks Obama wasn't qualified.
But for some reason he never lists the nonexistent qualifications in Trump's even thinner resume.
For some reason Trump's utter lack of qualifications is okay with you hypocrites, even as you're still whining about how unqualified Obama was.

[johnforbes]

Obama's net worth was under 1 million when he became president.

He had achieved nothing, but had an alarming quantity of far-Left associates.

Trump is worth between 5 and 10 billion dollars, and has succeeded at pretty much everything he has tried.

Does any entrepreneur succeed at each and every business endeavor? Well, of course not.

Nobody but a child would think that.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ There it is, folks: johnforbes believes a plutocracy is called for.

He thinks having less than a million dollars shows you are unqualified to be President and merely having more than a billion shows you ARE qualified to be President. He showed us no other qualification for Trump other than net worth.

"and has succeeded at pretty much everything he has tried."-johnforbes

He failed at casinos, he failed at food, he failed at alcohol, he failed at education, he failed at golf courses, he failed at marriage. The only things he has succeeded at (more than he failed at it) is real estate and popular entertainment.....apparently the only things that matter to reactionaries.

His real estate expertise might be useful for a President.......if it was still 1820 or if we want to take over some other countries. :shock:

[RealJustme]

He failed at casinos, he faled at food, he failed at alcohol, he failed at education, he failed at golf courses, he failed at marriage

We should all fail so well!

!wife.JPG (49.44 KiB) Viewed 9653 times

!food.JPG (58.91 KiB) Viewed 9653 times

!Casino.JPG (63.17 KiB) Viewed 9653 times

[Clownkicker]

Tool, the steaks are defunct, the casino is owned by someone else because Trump ran it into the ground, and having a third trophy wife does not make you a success at marriage, dimwit. It makes you a hypocrite.
If you have to buy it with money for a third time, it probably isn't real.

To see if I'm right, just go tell your wife you want to find someone younger to marry. See what happens.
That's why Righties like Newt Gingrich so much. He just unabashedly divorced his wife as she was still recovering from surgery so he could marry someone else. These phony conservatives eat that stuff up and give high fives all around.

RealTool lets us all know what those on the Right actually consider success. It's not the moral stuff they blather on about all the time. It's promiscuity, overpriced steak that no one wants, and making off with the money as the suckers eat the losses.

That's exactly how your sort fails, Tool.

[sillydaddy]

Clown finds himself defending Obama....again ?? :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^ What a fucking imbecile. :lol:

[johnforbes]

Clownhicker seems incapable of rational speech.

Obviously, one's net worth alone is not a qualification.

My net worth at the age of 30 was about 600 bucks.

The point, obviously, was that Barry O became president after achieving nothing.

His SAT and LSAT scores remain secret even today, and surely there's a reason for that secrecy. Any politician with good scores would rush to release them.

Even whether Barry was accepted as an international student is unknown.

A part-time law instructor, a state legislator who voted "present," and a US senator who quit his job.

He had, quite literally, accomplished nothing except a book ghostwritten apparently by Bill Ayers.

He sat 20 years listening to racist Jeremiah Wright.

Had it not been for the notion of a 1/2 black fellow with an African-sounding name, it is highly doubtful he would ever have been elected.

And we now know his record -- 9.7 percent U-6 unemployment, 19 trillion in debt, Obamacare passed on a pack of lies, etc.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ "All johnforbes can do is list why he thinks Obama wasn't qualified.
But for some reason he never lists the nonexistent qualifications in Trump's even thinner resume.
For some reason Trump's utter lack of qualifications is okay with you hypocrites, even as you're still whining about how unqualified Obama was."-me

"And why is his academic career at Wharton shrouded in mystery, johnny? Where are his transcripts? Where are his SAT scores?
And why don't any of his classmates remember him after four years together?"-me


What did I tell you?
Why does johnforbes think Trump is qualified to be President? Because "Trump has money and Obama wasn't qualified."
That's all johnforbes has. That's all anyone has.
Trump apparently has no qualifications anyone can think of other than his money.

[johnforbes]

Clownhicker seems incapable of rational speech.

Obviously, one's net worth alone is not a qualification.

My net worth at the age of 30 was about 600 bucks.

The point, obviously, was that Barry O became president after achieving nothing.

His SAT and LSAT scores remain secret even today, and surely there's a reason for that secrecy. Any politician with good scores would rush to release them.

Even whether Barry was accepted as an international student is unknown.

A part-time law instructor, a state legislator who voted "present," and a US senator who quit his job.

He had, quite literally, accomplished nothing except a book ghostwritten apparently by Bill Ayers.

He sat 20 years listening to racist Jeremiah Wright.

Had it not been for the notion of a 1/2 black fellow with an African-sounding name, it is highly doubtful he would ever have been elected.

And we now know his record -- 9.7 percent U-6 unemployment, 19 trillion in debt, Obamacare passed on a pack of lies, etc.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ What has all that irrelevant garbage got to do with Trump being a "substantive candidate", johnny?
You still haven't posted any qualifications for Trump on your own thread.

You do realize this thread is about Trump and not Obama, right?
Your repeatedly pointing out that Trump is even less qualified than Obama was doesn't make Trump look good, dummy.