[Dogzilla]

http://news.yahoo.com/last-planets-hott ... 33136.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[brandon]

You feelin' the Bern, Dog?

[RealJustme]

The article says it was warmer in 1880, wonder why it was warmer in 1880 than it is now? Thinking logically since it was warmer in 1880 than it is now, the planet has actually cooled during a period of man's highest carbon production. But hey, let's not get logical on this stuff, otherwise we're getting off of the agenda track. Or was it just a poorly written article?

Not only was 2015 the warmest worldwide since 1880, it shattered the previous record held in 2014 by the widest margin ever observed, said the report by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

[Grog]

Hmm. It was warmer in 1880 or maybe that's when they started keeping records?

I know. It doesn't matter. :lol:

[RealJustme]

Exactly, it's coming from NASA who's primary mission has been reaching out to Muslims and arguing Obama's agenda.

[Grog]

There you go. JustFreedManMe once again shows his deep knowledge and accurate understanding of any and every topic. :lol:

[RealJustme]

"When I became the NASA administrator, (President Obama) charged me with three things. One, he wanted me to help re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math and engineering."

Dude he really said that! The very month Charles Bolden took over NASA, they all of a sudden got into the man made climate change business, prior to Bolden the climate wasn't an issue for NADA.

Exactly why NASA is now nothing but a joke, their findings on global warming have been debunked and you can bet they've already drafted up a report for the end of 2016 which will say "2016 was the warmest year on record."

[Grog]

And there it is again! With yet another quote! Who could doubt the veracity of anything JustFreedManMe posts here?! :lol:

[sillydaddy]

Is it hot in here?....or is it just me? :lol:

[Dogzilla]

Maybe it's a fever.

Yeah, Brandon.....Ole Bernie is really pullin em out! I think it's gonna get real interesting.

[johnforbes]

Miss Peggy Lee!

[Intrepid]

Too much info to C&P, so here is a link that addresses the lie that 2015 was the hottest year, EVER!

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ium=social

[tvd]

Your article has 5 bullet points; basically 2,3, and 5 address the same thing. The data.

The data has been found to be manipulated. Fact.

This fact negates ANY argument put forth by these dweebs regarding global warming.
It is natural and normal, and will swing the other way 20-30 to 100 years from now.

Why do these fucking libs have to grab onto these "sky is falling" crusades? Are they that much of a set of do-gooders wanting to run everyone's lives just like THEY want?

And I still say that raising the cost of living for all of us WILL NOT FIX THE "PROBLEM"!!!!!
Global temps will still go up, global temps will still go down, and the money will be gone.....err...unaccounted for.

[johnforbes]

Interestingly, Peggy Lee was the daughter of Bruce Lee and Kathie Lee.

[Intrepid]

Lee Harvey Oswald was her twin brother who was abducted at birth by the CIA to fulfill their nefarious schemes.

[Intrepid]

Lumpy assured me it was true.

[Clownkicker]

Insipid debunks climate change theory and the claim that 2015 was the hottest year on record.

How? By 'proving' 2015 was only the THIRD hottest year on record. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Way to go, Insipid!



Criminy, these reactionary clowns...

[RealJustme]

U guys do realize the planet was authorized climate changes prior to NASA don't you? NASA is looking at very, very, very small period in time, actually just a blink in the planet's history. I'm betting that 100 million years ago the climate was very different than it is now.

Now if they had data going back 100 million years and can show the climate was consistent until the last 100 years, then dudes that would be "significant scientific" information.

[johnforbes]

Exactly.

There's only about a century or so of solid scientific data.

When people talk about ice cores, about all they find is an ice cube soaked with whiskey consumed by Clownswisher in 1882.

[RealJustme]

There's only about a century or so of solid scientific data.

Even then they manipulated the scientific data they had to get the results they wanted.

[elklindo69]

There's only about a century or so of solid scientific data.

Even then they manipulated the scientific data they had to get the results they wanted.

Finagle's Second Law:

No matter what the experiment's result, there will always be someone eager to:
(a) misinterpret it.
(b) fake it.
or
(c) believe it supports his own pet theory.

Way to go Justme!!!

:lol:

[Intrepid]

AssClown Loser Lucky plays his usual silly ass word games in order to do his victory dance.
Lame, but it's what we expect.

[Clownkicker]

In other words, Pinky Boy Loser Insipid can't deny that what I said is true, so he distracts and diverts with his usual stupidity.

Of course, there was no "word game" in my post. I merely read the article he linked to and reported on it.
If he could comprehend what he reads, Insipid would have come to the same conclusion.

But instead he'll just dance and snarl on command because he's got nothing else.

[Grog]

There are very things funnier than watching conservatives talk about science. :lol:

[johnforbes]

If we examine Social Statics by Spencer, Grog has no "fitness" for this forum.

[Intrepid]

If AssClown Loser Lucky, or any of the Usual Suspects had bothered to study the data an interesting phenomenon would have jumped right out. But of course they would have ignored it because it doesn't support the absurd idea of man caused global warming (or whatever they are calling it this week).

If you look you will see on the graph that the warmest year, 1998, was followed by two of the coolest years, followed by years of temps roughly the same, or close to it. The coolest year of all, 2008, was followed two years later by the warmest year of the study, then temps dropping sharply only to start gradually increasing to near the median.

To make it plain for the Useful Idiots, there is no upward trend. Temps rise and fall randomly.
But since this does not contribute to the hysteria and calls for the government to take over all aspects of our lives and support the left's agenda to take from producer nations and give to non producing ones, it will be ignored.

AssClown Loser Lucky can play his silly ass word games, throw tantrums and spew emoticons all he wants. He cannot dispute the facts or **** the issue as he has been ordered to do by the commissar in charge of propaganda and disinformation in the directorate communist bullshit.

Forward comrade!

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^ :lol:


Once again Pinky Boy Loser Insipid proves to us all that he neither understands climate change theory or even how the term "warming trend" applies to graphs. Graphs of such things rarely, if ever, move in a straight line upward or downward.
Thus the word "trend".

It is meaningless to our friendly turd Insipid that 15 of the past 16 years have been the warmest on record, and how that fits into a "warming trend".

But thanks for snarling and dancing on command for us, dimwit. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Dogzilla]

He really IS as dumb as a stump.

[johnforbes]

Shall we restart the thread whereby we politely give Clownstumper and Dogzilla an opportunity to reveal their wonderful credentials in the field of climate science?

They never explained the academic source of their expertise, but surely they both have extensive formal academic training in this area?

[Clownkicker]

Shall we restart johnforbes' post whereby we politely give Pinky Boy Loser Insipid, RealTool, tvdunce, and johnfibs the same opportunity to reveal their wonderful credentials in the field of climate science?
johnforbes apparently feels that no one without a degree in climate science is qualified to have an opinion on the subject.
Yet not once has he questioned the qualifications of those others in a similar manner when they post on the subject, even as they have all demonstrated a gross ignorance of the topic.

Why?
Because he's a fucking hypocrite douche bag, of course.

[Dogzilla]

Your lip action and tongue action is great, JJ. Now if you could just learn to deepthroat without all that gagging, you be A-1 in my book!

[johnforbes]

When did Dogzilla turn homo?

Oh well, perhaps he hung around CLownlicker too long.

In any event, let's politely give Dogzilla and Clownhicker a chance to explain their vast expertise in climate science.

Surely they have many credentials which would dazzle lesser mortals?