Political discussions about everything
By elklindo69
#66038
Police found an explosive device Sunday in the home of a 55-year-old Richmond, California man who allegedly threatened to harm the local Muslim community, according to a local report.

Police evacuated William Celli's neighborhood when they found a device at his home on Sunday and detonated it, Bay Area TV station KPIX reported. Celli was arrested and booked into county jail on Sunday afternoon, according to the report.

KPIX reported a tipster told police Thursday that a man was making devices and threatening to harm Muslims. But while law enforcement said Celli's statements attracted their attention, police wouldn't elaborate on the threats, according to the report.

"We thank law enforcement authorities for their swift action and we will monitor this alleged case of domestic terrorism closely as it moves through the legal system," said Zahra Billoo, executive director of the San Francisco Bay Area chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Celli frequently posted on Facebook, where he appeared to align himself with Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. In October, Celli wrote: "I'll follow this MAN to the end of the world."

Celli also posted: "Donald Trump’s on again I’m feeling good about myself."

He's also posted about undocumented immigrants who have "invaded" America and wrote that Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is turning Canada into "A LEFT WING POT SMOKIN WELFARE STATE (sic)".

This wouldn't be the first time an apparent Trump supporter allegedly committed a hate crime. In August, two Boston men cited Trump's anti-immigrant campaign rhetoric when explaining to police why they beat up and urinated on a homeless man. The candidate initially called those followers "passionate" before condemning their crime in stronger terms.
By Clownkicker
#66052
So johnny, when was the last time a Hillary voter blew somebody up or shot them?

I'm sure you must have some pithy thoughts on the discrepancy between the two candidates' followers.

You think it could have anything to do with their messages?
Does Hillary simply instill a sense of peace and well being or something?
By Intrepid
#66064
More to the point, the list of people who found themselves to be inconvenient to the Clinton Outfit and are now dead is long and distinguished. The Clintons don't rely on campaign supporters to blow things up and gun people down. They have hand picked operatives standing ready for the next hit to be ordered.
By Clownkicker
#66070
So you're admitting that Trump inspires more violent behavior in his adherents than does Clinton.

Way to go, johnny.
That took courage to use Pinky Boy Loser Insipid's rumor and speculation mill to support Hillary.
He'll be here dancing and sputtering any minute.
Of course, rather than be upset at you, he will admit I was right but pretend I was wrong. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#66081
So you're admitting that Trump inspires more violent behavior in his adherents than does Clinton.
It was Clinton that sent us to war with Muslims, Trump was against it.
By sillydaddy
#66082
Does Hillary simply instill a sense of peace and well being or something?
Actually it's Hillary that incites violence...when she falsely accuses a presidential candidate of treason

without proof.....and then riles up all her female supporters by telling them the backlash for her

outrageous comments is aimed at them! This must be the"something", eh Clown! Because it's not

a sense peace nor well being !
User avatar
By RealJustme
#66083
"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
During an interview on CBS Evening News with Dan Rather
September 13, 2001
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has rebuilt his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members... This is a very difficult vote, this is probably the hardest decision I've ever had to make. Any vote that might lead to war should be hard, but I cast it with conviction."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998

So tell us again how the Clinton's war on Muslims in the Middle East was OK but Trump saying they should be fully vetted before coming into the United States isn't?
By Clownkicker
#66089
Okay, silly, if it's Clinton that incites violence, then I'm sure you can post a couple examples of Clinton supporters being violent because of something she said.
But you won't because you can't.
You're just making up stupid shit.


Tool, why are you drifting so far off topic?
Not only are you no longer talking about candidate supporter violence, but you've gone clear off on ridiculous junk from 15 years ago. :lol:

Stop pretending I say the idiotic stuff you attribute to me.
Whenever you say I said something, everyone already knows I didn't. :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#66090
Not only are you no longer talking about candidate supporter violence, but you've gone clear off on ridiculous junk from 15 years ago
So Hillary's war on Muslims to kill bad Muslims hasn't made Muslims mad, but Trump saying Muslim should be vetted to keep out bad Muslims does make them mad?
By Clownkicker
#66091
Try to stay on topic, Tool.
And stop trying to put words into my mouth about Hillary starting a war in 1998, which she clearly didn't do.
Hillary was not President in 1998.
Forget about the Gulf War that W. Bush started and stay with things going on today, because that's what we are talking about on this thread.
Stop constantly pointing "over there" when your clown is making a fool of himself.

This thread is not about Muslim violence.
It's about Trump supporters being violent.

When you find an example of Hillary supporters being violent because of something she said, be sure to post it right alongside silly's examples. :lol:
By elklindo69
#66092
Trump is a radicalizing force...

1. A Muslim cabbie was hot at in Pittsburgh.
2. Someone shot at a car leaving a Mosque in Tampa.
3. A woman berating Muslims for praying????
4. A bullet ridden Quran was dumped at the door of an Islamic store.
5. A Muslim woman was threatened by a guy with a knife at a car wash.
6. A Muslim community center in Hawthorne CA was vandalized.

And numerous other countless incidences that were instigated by Trump and his hateful speech. Where's the outrage on the right? Trump is running for president and he doesn't even bother to disavow those vile acts. I suppose he can't...because 'they' are his base...
User avatar
By RealJustme
#66099
1. A Muslim cabbie was hot at in Pittsburgh.
2. Someone shot at a car leaving a Mosque in Tampa.
3. A woman berating Muslims for praying????
4. A bullet ridden Quran was dumped at the door of an Islamic store.
5. A Muslim woman was threatened by a guy with a knife at a car wash.
6. A Muslim community center in Hawthorne CA was vandalized.
None of them beheaded? Sounds like they just a normal day in the hoods. 6 blacks were shot in Chicago just last night, why no mention of them? How come Muslims are escaping the violence?
By Intrepid
#66102
Radical muuzzies are responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11, plus all the attacks they have perpetrated since, and Trump is responsible for people being fed up with and pissed off by a bunch of crazy goat fuckers and getting a little pay back. Never gonna sell that steaming pile to anyone but other libtards.
By elklindo69
#66104
Intrepid wrote:Radical muuzzies are responsible for the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11, plus all the attacks they have perpetrated since, and Trump is responsible for people being fed up with and pissed off by a bunch of crazy goat fuckers and getting a little pay back. Never gonna sell that steaming pile to anyone but other libtards.
A survey of law-enforcement officials about America’s most serious threats did not point to foreign religious extremists. Vox had an interesting report on who’s seen as an even bigger security risk.

In a 2014 survey, the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) surveyed hundreds of law enforcement personnel at the state and local level, all of whom had training in intelligence gathering or counterterrorism. They were presented with a list of radical groups and asked to rate, on a scale of 1 to 4, how much they agreed that this group posed a terrorist threat to the US.

The anti-government “sovereign citizen” movement was #1, followed by “Islamic extremists.” On the list of groups perceived as the highest threat, anti-government militias was third, followed by skinheads and Neo-Nazis. They were followed by animal rights extremists, environmental extremists, and then the KKK.

Granted, the data is a year old, and it’s possible attitudes among law-enforcement professionals have changed a bit since 2014, but that doesn’t change the striking nature of the findings.

Indeed, the findings found, “Approximately 39 percent of respondents agreed and 28 percent strongly agreed that Islamic extremists were a serious terrorist threat. In comparison, 52 percent of respondents agreed and 34 percent strongly agreed that sovereign citizens were a serious terrorist threat.”
By Clownkicker
#66144
johnforbes is calling someone else "a dolt" as he yammers to himself for days like a street corner lunatic on moronic threads like http://forums.voyeurweb.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8744.

And he isn't saying it with the slightest irony.
johnforbes honestly can't see that he is the patent dolt on this board.
When he's not starting indisputably stupid personal attack threads, he's copy-and-pasting his own droning platitudes and truisms ad nauseum because he is incapable of refuting anything said that exposes his mindless blather for what it is.

Reading johnforbes is like watching a piano playing chicken.
It's curiously impressive that a beast of such low intelligence could be taught anything at all, but it's still just conditioned responses by a performing dumb cluck.
By johnforbes
#66156
Now hold on for one second here.

I have tickled the ivory a time or two.

Well, tickled it, that's all.

No Irish fellow such as myself could ever learn to play piano.
Green Energy

Clean energy has gone down more than a Clinton int[…]

Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Open Popunder Manually