Open Discussions about the VoyeurWeb.com site
By RalphGhe
#62918
Why did the section "What I Saw" end? Someone earlier commented that there were only wives and girlfriends in it so what was the need for it. Actually there were many true voyeur photos there. So now the site VoyeurWeb has no voyeur photos which were the draw for it in the early years.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62921
Legal (and even moral) issues would be my best guess.
By RalphGhe
#62937
What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62949
RalphGhe wrote:What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
That's a very narrow minded view. Do a little Googling before laying down the law. :roll:
Manager of the Autopen

Remember the last GOP investigation into the Biden[…]

Obliterated what?

Yes, johnny, we get it. You've got nothin. You're[…]

johnny, obviously Trump is ignorant of it as a Sha[…]

Pam Bondi's Fictitious client list

Geezus, johnforbes' life is actually so pathetic t[…]

Per the CIA, Brennan, former FBI Director James Co[…]

Secret Slut

We had dinner with a man who used to be my wife’s […]

Forbes is Real, Not Fictitious

There is Carnation milk. If you get out another, […]

Thoughts?