[Intrepid]

If you notice, in the photograph of the first shooting location from yesterday, there is a sign clearly posted in the window of the recruiting office that strictly prohibits firearms at that location. If guns were prohibited, how could the shooter ever have possibly carried out his assault?

Oh, that's right, like we tell the libtards, criminals don't obey laws, do they?
What they do is target gun free zones where they know nobody will be shooting back.

But couldn't they call the cops?

They did. Remember, when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
Far enough away that he could drive to the second location and kill or wound six people.
One armed citizen or a Marine who was allowed to be armed would have made a difference.
But since guns frighten little libtard girly men, we have to allow criminals to have their way.

And you notice Hussein Obozo STILL can't call this Muslim terrorism.

[RealJustme]

If guns were prohibited, how could the shooter ever have possibly carried out his assault?

He couldn't have, it was a no gun zone, did the media make this whole shooting up? We all know that bad guys can't have guns in no gun zones, that's why we need more of them.

[johnforbes]

For the same reasons, there are no gun murders in Chicago this year.

[elklindo69]

If guns were prohibited, how could the shooter ever have possibly carried out his assault?

He couldn't have, it was a no gun zone, did the media make this whole shooting up? We all know that bad guys can't have guns in no gun zones, that's why we need more of them.

A bad guy recently shot up a police station in Dallas.

Looks like the NRA pissed away millions trying to convince people that gun zones deter bad guys with guns...

[johnforbes]

Elkin, you are missing the point.

The Left is trying to pass new gun restriction laws and regulations all the time.

They have never worked to deter or limit crime.

[Intrepid]

Everyone should question why the left is so hell bent on destroying the 2nd Amendment and eliminating the right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms to hunt, enjoy the shooting sports and protect themselves.
There is only one answer and it is frightening in it's implications.

Their efforts are always cloaked in "humanitarian, common sense and reasonable" incremental steps with the ultimate goal of disarming law abiding citizens and confiscation. Never is there any focus on the criminals who ignore laws. Instead they coddle and make excuses for those criminals who prey on the weak, infirm and those unable to defend themselves.

Liberalism is indeed a mental disorder.

[Dogzilla]

There's nothing wrong with guns or with owning them. It's the evil, crazy muthafukkas like Toothache that are the problem. They should be euthanized.

[Intrepid]

Stepping right up there to the edge Crotch Sniffer.
Keep going.

Say, you should know....does N.C. have a three strikes law?
You got two on you now and the pitcher is winding up....

[RealJustme]

A bad guy recently shot up a police station in Dallas.

Great example clown, because the police were armed they took him out, not one police officer or citizen wounded. Imagine the deaths had that been a gun free zone. The guy was armed to the teeth including explosives, he fucked up by attacked people who were armed and could fight back, .

Dallas police HQ shooting: Suspect James Boulware killed during standoff

http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/13/us/dallas ... -shooting/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;