[RealJustme]

President Obama faced off with a heckler during a reception celebrating LGBT Pride Month at the White House, telling the person “you’re in my house.”

Obama was interrupted shortly after beginning his speech to the crowd by a person who repeatedly shouted the president’s name.

“No, no, no , no. Listen, you’re in my house,” Obama told the person.

“You’re not going to get a good response from me by interrupting me like this,” Obama said.

But the heckler would not let up, despite Obama’s pleas, boos from the crowd and chants of “Obama! Obama!” The president became visibly irritated, and the woman was escorted from the room at his request.

“Shame on you, you shouldn’t be doing this,” he said.

The protester was identified as Jennicet Gutiérrez by the Not One More Campaign, which opposes the Obama administration’s deportation policies.

Gutiérrez, an undocumented transgender woman, could be heard shouting “not one more” and “stop all deportations.”

“As a general rule, I am just fine with a few hecklers,” Obama said. “But not when I am up in my house. My attitude is if you’re eating my hors d'oeuvres, you know what I’m saying? And drinking my booze? I know that’s right.”

The transgender should have pointed out the White House is not Obama's house and that the hors d'oeuvres and booze were paid by tax payers like "it" not Obama.

[sillydaddy]

After all these years Obama can not be Presidential, not even in the White House.

All he had to do was call for "Security" and the heckler would be gone.

But no..Obama had to act like the nigger that he is and get into a cock fight with that faggot.

"Listen, you're in my house"....Please, that sounds so ghetto.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^Look at these clowns.

They're complaining about Obama taking flack because he's deporting too many illegals. :lol:

[Malcolm]

"How shameful," Brown said. "We’re making this decision knowing that people will lose their jobs because of our action."

http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/0 ... fast-track

[tvd]

^^^^^Look at these clowns.

They're complaining about Obama taking flack because he's deporting too many illegals. :lol:

Defending the indefensible again. So predictable.

They are not complaining of anything of the sort. Had I posted that, you would be bitching about comprehension problems.
They are complaining of that shithead's contention that it is "his house". But you knew that , didn't you?

[johnforbes]

The White House belongs to the people, not some transitory socialist.

The only real question is whether he has so completely ruined the country that it can never recover its former greatness.

[RealJustme]

the hors d'oeuvres and booze were paid

What was really ghetto is when Obama told the fag he should shut up because he's eating his hors d'oeuvres and drinking his booze in his house, all of which is false.

So let me get this right, when Obama holds meetings for transgenders, tax payers are serving them hors d'oeuvres and booze?

[Clownkicker]

"Defending the indefensible again. So predictable."-tvdunce

I defended nothing, you complete moron. Why can't you buffoons ever read what I said?
I just find it hilarious that you troglodytes never understand the implications and hypocrisies of the partisan bandwagons you all are constantly jumping on like political lemmings.
Was Obama taking flack from a heckler because he was deporting too many illegals or not?
Pointing out a fact that you clowns ignore is not "defending" someone. It's recognizing reality, which I know is something every last one of you reactionaries dread above all else.

THIS is what "defending " something would look like, tvd:
You clowns are only demonstrating that you don't understand the meaning and usage of the phrase " you’re in my house". It is not a term used to describe legal ownership. It is used to describe who controls a place.
Everyone in the room laughed when he said it because they all understood that Obama was talking "street".
Reactionary tools lack a sense of humor, so of course they don't laugh, or even "get it".

First of all, it IS Obama's house, just as it is every President's house for the time they are there.
Just as a renter's house is "his house". The renter doesn't own it, but the actual owner can't enter without permission. The actual owner can't disrespect the tenant's rights to the house. Legally the tenant has the right to control the house as long as he meets the terms of the lease.
If you don't believe me, take the White House Tour and try wandering off through the house. Tell the guy who stops you that you are just one of the building's owners inspecting the premises. See how far that gets you.
But you idiots still want to insist on some semantics game about who technically owns the place, so I'll illustrate your ignorance further.

Think of your regional major sports franchise, especially in basketball. The team rarely owns the venue they play in any longer. The city usually owns it now. And yet, when an opposing team comes to town, what do the home teams say when the opponent threatens to win the game? "Not in OUR house!" They even put up banners around the walls saying that very thing.
Do you morons stand up and complain that the team doesn't actually own the stadium and they shouldn't use the phrase?
Of course not. You understand what the phrase means in that context. You know that the stadium is "their house" as long as they occupy it, even though they don't own it, just as the White House is any sitting President's house.
You dummies really need to make some small effort to keep up with the language used in your own country.

Should Obama have handled it better? I watched the video and I think he did fine. He turned a disruption into something humorous.
He tried to get the person to understand that they can protest, but that they should pick the proper venue to do so, and that disrespecting him in his own home is not the way to expect to be heard.
Every last one of you would feel the same if someone were disrespecting you at your home.

I just can't believe the petty stupid shit you idiots always jump on as though it is stuff that actually matters.
Usually it's because you don't even understand the thing you're letting your handlers get you upset about.

[Intrepid]

TL:DR

[RealJustme]

I just find it hilarious that you troglodytes never understand the implications and hypocrisies of the partisan bandwagons you all are constantly jumping on like political lemmings.

Is that why you just wrote a book on that post defending Obama? So are you agreeing with Obama that the White House is his house therefore no one has a say but him? How ghetto of him to even bring up the free booze he's letting the "it" drink as another reason to keep his mouth shut.

[tvd]

Har har....so he writes a book defending his indefensible position.

What say ye, Mr Roget?

[Clownkicker]

So let's synopsize the above posts, shall we:

"Well, I can't refute anything you said. I'll make up some stupid shit instead."-RealTool

"Nope, I can't refute anything he said either."-tvdummy


They just keep yammering even when they have nothing to say.

[RealJustme]

Clown, put the booze away, read this over, take a break, take as much time as you feel you need, then try and answer the question.

So are you agreeing with Obama that the White House is his house therefore no one has a say in the White House but him?

Please spare us a 400 word hissy fit, a yes or no will suffice.

Carlos

[Clownkicker]

There is no "yes" or "no" answer to that stupidity, Tool.

I can't agree or disagree with something Obama never said and didn't mean.
You made it up, like you're always making up stupid shit and pretending I agree with it.
(Remember, English is only your second language. Don't try to tell native speakers what it really means.)

And for gods sake, watch the video before you simply swallow the crap your handlers are feeding you.

[RealJustme]

There is no "yes" or "no" answer to that stupidity, Tool.

I can't agree or disagree with something Obama never said and didn't mean.
You made it up, like you're always making up stupid shit and pretending I agree with it.

OK, listen to Obama in his own words then get back to us.

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Clownkicker]

"...therefore no one has a say in the White House but him? "-RealTool

See, your own link supports me. Nowhere in that video did Obama say "It's my house and no one has a say but me"
And he didn't say anything even remotely like that.
He DID say 'you can't come in here being disrespectful and expect a positive response.'
He never said he wouldn't listen. He just said 'don't interrupt what I have to say when you've been invited to my house.'
In other words, he behaved exactly like you would behave if you invited someone to your house and they kept disrespecting you.

What you are making up is what an ESL person might misunderstand English to mean.
Provide a quotation (with video time stamp) of something Obama actually said and then ask me is I agree with that, not some crap that's only in your head.

[RealJustme]

See, your own link supports me. Nowhere in that video did Obama say "It's my house and no one has a say but me"
And he didn't say anything even remotely like that.

Really? Obama told the "it" it's his house and then had the "it" forcefully removed when "it" said "it" had more to say. Wiggle wiggle clown, try and recoup from this one. :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

"TL:DR"-Insipid

^^^^^Apparently that means "Too Long for Dimwitted Readers"

[Clownkicker]

So Tool, what you're saying is you can't actually quote anything Obama said to support your contention.

That's what I thought already.
Get back to us when you have some evidence to support your foolishness.

Remember, if you can't quote him saying it, then he didn't say it.

[johnforbes]

There is a yes or no answer to the main question of whether Clownhacker is a disingenuous socialist.

The answer is yes.