[RealJustme]

The New York Times has discovered an intelligence report prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and sent to Clinton and other senior administration officials on September 12, 2012, just one day after the attacks, concluded that the attack “was planned ten or more days” in advance and was meant to “kill as many Americans as possible.” The report identifies al Qaeda terrorists involved in the assault.

Despite this, the Obama administration crafted a public narrative that the attack had evolved from a “spontaneous” protest over a YouTube video and included a wide range of individuals. Clinton cited the video in remarks at a memorial service on September 14, 2012, for those killed in the attacks. She told members of the victims’ families that the administration would bring to justice those responsible for the video. The DIA report and several other Benghazi-related documents were released to Judicial Watch pursuant to a court order in response to a FOIA request.

The DIA report further undermines the administration’s already-tattered claims that its public case was based on intelligence assessments. Emails released in response to a previous Judicial Watch request showed that the White House had drafted a set of political talking points that sought to blame the video and not administration policy.

Those lying bastards need to be held accountable.

[Benny]

First of all nothing can stop HC from serving two terms. And really what difference does it make, if Hillary the Blue Progressive isn't approved we get Graham the Red Progressive? Or some other. It's all a fucking big joke. :lol:

[Clownkicker]

Amazing!

RealTool posts the smoking gun that shows Obama didn't know the truth about Benghazi until more than a month after the election was over, not a month before the election.

RealTool voluntarily proves to us that the FOXnews narrative about "Hilary lied to insure Obama's re-election" was just another Right Wing lie from his handlers all along.

Thanks for exposing your own scumbag handlers with that update, Tool.
I would say I'm proud of you, but I know you're too stupid to realize what you just did.:lol:

[RealJustme]

RealTool posts the smoking gun that shows Obama didn't know the truth about Benghazi until more than a month after the election was over, not a month before the election.

Clown thinks the elections were held in August 2012 :lol: :lol: :lol:

[Clownkicker]

Oops, I pulled a "RealTool".

I read "December 14" instead of "September 14".

Now I know what it is to live "the RealTool experience".

[elklindo69]

The New York Times has discovered an intelligence report prepared by the Defense Intelligence Agency and sent to Clinton and other senior administration officials on September 12, 2012, just one day after the attacks, concluded that the attack “was planned ten or more days” in advance and was meant to “kill as many Americans as possible.” The report identifies al Qaeda terrorists involved in the assault.

Despite this, the Obama administration crafted a public narrative that the attack had evolved from a “spontaneous” protest over a YouTube video and included a wide range of individuals. Clinton cited the video in remarks at a memorial service on September 14, 2012, for those killed in the attacks. She told members of the victims’ families that the administration would bring to justice those responsible for the video. The DIA report and several other Benghazi-related documents were released to Judicial Watch pursuant to a court order in response to a FOIA request.

The DIA report further undermines the administration’s already-tattered claims that its public case was based on intelligence assessments. Emails released in response to a previous Judicial Watch request showed that the White House had drafted a set of political talking points that sought to blame the video and not administration policy.

Those lying bastards need to be held accountable.

Who received the documents? The NYT or Judicial Watch?

Another Justme hatchet C&P job? And the never ending saga continues...

LMAO

:lol:

[Intrepid]

The two looney lefty libtards of the VW poli board once again demonstrate they don't have the first clue. Or, they have no way to refute facts so they rely on slinging bullshit.
This is what we have learned to expect from emotion driven, knee jerk reactionary liberals.
And why they are so easy do dismiss as idiots.

[RealJustme]

The two looney lefty libtards of the VW poli board once again demonstrate they don't have the first clue. Or, they have no way to refute facts so they rely on slinging bullshit.

LOL, Clown tried twice and still couldn't make it go away.

[johnforbes]

Panetta has already said that he told Obama and Hillary and Rice on the evening of Sept 11, 2012 that it was (quoting him) "an attack by terrorists."

So they all knew, and Obama and Hillary were lying weeks later about a video.

[elklindo69]

Panetta has already said that he told Obama and Hillary and Rice on the evening of Sept 11, 2012 that it was (quoting him) "an attack by terrorists."

So they all knew, and Obama and Hillary were lying weeks later about a video.

Forbes is a lying ass hack of shit who's recycling a fabricated Hoax News story.

Panetta never made such a statement on the 11th. Nor did the white house ever claim that the compound was attacked by terrorists the day after the incident...

[johnforbes]

Elkin, you are simply uninformed.

Panetta said he told Obama, and Hillary, that it was -- quoting him directly -- an "attack by terrorists."

He said further: "We told the president that there's an attack that's going on, that terrorists are involved in the attack, and, as a result, we have to respond to it."

Elkin, after all this time, you should know that you are free to disagree with my opinions, but I don't post things which are not factually correct.

[johnforbes]

Panetta said to NBC:

" I told the White House from the very beginning, that evening, that Benghazi was a terrorist attack."

[Intrepid]

Thundering silence from Elkindoofus, the stupidest person on the interwebs.
In fact, I believe Panetta, by all accounts an honorable man even for a Donkey-Rat, wrote a book to make sure his actions were documented. In the face of such stunning incompetence from the Hussein Obozo regime, that's a very good idea.

[johnforbes]

There are many interviews available where Panetta said this.

The evening of Sept 11, as the attacks were still unfolding, Panetta was telling the White House it was an attack by terrorists.

As he noted, "spontaneous" demonstrators do not bring along military-grade weapons.

Also, as we now know, the WH had other sources of info telling them it was terrorism.

But the facts conflicted with Obama's campaign narrative that terrorism was "on the run" (his words), so he lied and Rice was sent out to lie on 5 Sunday talk shows, and Obama was still telling that tale weeks later at the UN, and Hillary lied multiples times about it later.

They even told the same fairy tale to the mother of one of the brave men who died in Benghazi.

So these are lies about foreign policy at the very apex of government, which made it worse than Watergate in which nobody died.

[elklindo69]

Panetta said to NBC:

" I told the White House from the very beginning, that evening, that Benghazi was a terrorist attack."

So is that what Panetta said to NBC on Sept 11, 2012?

[johnforbes]

Elkin, are you drunk?

I would hope Panetta spent that evening talking to the White House rather than some network.