[RealJustme]

MONROVIA, Liberia — As bodies littered the streets and the sick lay dying in front of overwhelmed clinics last year, President Obama ordered the largest American intervention ever in a global health crisis, hoping to stem the deadliest Ebola epidemic in history.

But after spending hundreds of millions of dollars and deploying nearly 3,000 troops to build Ebola treatment centers, the United States ended up creating facilities that have largely sat empty: Only 28 Ebola patients have been treated at the 11 treatment units built by the United States military, American officials now say.

Nine centers have never had a single Ebola patient. The United States has spent $1.4 billion on its Ebola mission in West Africa, with most of it going to Liberia. Deploying the military cost $360 million, not including the construction, staffing and operating expenses at the treatment centers it built. Ongoing costs are expected to exceed $3 billion by years end with most of the money being spent unaccounted for.

[tvd]

What am I always harping on??????????

WASTE!!! WASTE!!! WASTE!!!

and look at that last line...."with most of the money going unaccounted for."

Fucking motherfucking government.

[sillydaddy]

And yet we still manage to keep Obama in golf balls......

[RealJustme]

The deployment of the military and billions of dollars to "fight" Ebola was nothing more than a means for Obama to provide reparations to Africa that Obama feels America owes.

[elklindo69]

More than a trillion spent in the cluster fuck called Iraq.

Vote Bush!

[RealJustme]

More than a trillion spent in the cluster fuck called Iraq.

To bad Bush won't be on the ballet in 2016, but Hillary may be.

Senator Hillary Clinton- It is clear, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make -- any vote that may lead to war should be hard -- but I cast it with conviction.

My decision is influenced by my eight years of experience on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue in the White House watching my husband deal with serious challenges to our nation by Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction. I want this President, or any future President, to be in the strongest possible position to lead our country in the United Nations or in war. Secondly, I want to insure that Saddam Hussein makes no mistake about our national unity and for our support for the President's efforts to wage America's war against terrorists and weapons of mass destruction.

[elklindo69]

More than a trillion spent in the cluster fuck called Iraq.

To bad Bush won't be on the ballet in 2016, but Hillary may be.

Senator Hillary Clinton- It is clear, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.

In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.

This is a very difficult vote. This is probably the hardest decision I have ever had to make -- any vote that may lead to war should be hard -- but I cast it with conviction.

My decision is influenced by my eight years of experience on the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue in the White House watching my husband deal with serious challenges to our nation by Iraq's known weapons of mass destruction. I want this President, or any future President, to be in the strongest possible position to lead our country in the United Nations or in war. Secondly, I want to insure that Saddam Hussein makes no mistake about our national unity and for our support for the President's efforts to wage America's war against terrorists and weapons of mass destruction.

And Justme falls back on revisionist history....again!!!

LMAO!!!

:lol:

[RealJustme]

And Justme falls back on revisionist history....again!!!

Liberals ignore history, that's why you're so uneducated and ignorant.