[RealJustme]

Amazing, the White House basically said the News Paper had the attack coming for offending Muslims, although they quickly add they condone the attacks they do understand why it happened.

On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/ ... lie-hebdo/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Clownkicker]

RealTool, you need to post some evidence for the White House "condemning" the paper as your title claims or the judgement of the paper.

You didn't. You only linked to a propaganda piece from your handlers and you didn't bother to listen for the alleged condemnation.
What I saw said they "questioned" the judgement.
Questioning something is not the same as condemning it, dimwit.

The only condemnation included in that video is the unequivocal condemnation of violence.
There was no condemnation whatsoever of the paper itself. To the contrary, he said of course the paper had the right to print what it wants.

Stop being such a tool.

[snakeoil]

The "Religion of Peace" strikes again. CNN is reporting that the 3 terrorists have been arrested.

[RealJustme]

While the White House condemns the news paper and the cartoons, Drudge actually had the balls to link to them, screw the White House and Muslim terrorists who are offended by the cartoons.

http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... lie-hebdo/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[Clownkicker]

But the White House DIDN"T condemn the news paper and the cartoons, dimwit.

That was just explained to you.

You're simply regurgitating your handlers' programming.

Talking to The Tool is exactly like talking to a brick wall.

[RealJustme]

But the White House DIDN"T condemn the news paper and the cartoons

Either you didn't listen to White House announcement I provided the link to or you lie!

[Clownkicker]

Read my first post, Tool.

Clearly I DID listen to the video and clearly you simply swallowed the title on the propaganda without listening to it.
There was no condemnation of anything by the White House except violence.

All you need to do is show me a quote from a reputable site where the White House says they condemn the paper and I will believe you.

But you won't because you can't.
You're just as useless as nutless johnforbes: all yack and no sack.

[RealJustme]

Clown- Clearly I DID listen to the video and clearly you simply swallowed the title on the propaganda without listening to it.There was no condemnation of anything by the White House

The killing of people just because they don't follow the Koran should be condemned by not only the White House but also by you.

[Clownkicker]

See Tool, that's why you're such a scumbag. You deliberately misrepresent what I said by leaving out the part that said the very thing you pretend I didn't say.

You dishonest fuck.

[sillydaddy]

The White House clearly disagreed with the Paris News Paper decision to publish cartoons poking fun at jihadists and Muslim extremists....and Clown may have a valid argument that the White House does not come out and use stronger language.
However now after the attack that killed the Paper's editor among others....Obama refused to call the attackers Islamic terrorists even though witnesses heard them shout in Arabic," We are avenging the Prophet Mohammed", and "God is Great".

So although some news headlines here in the US may say that Obama, "condemns the Islamic Terrorist attack", the fact is he does not. His language is quite timid when addressing the issue..... and even consciously avoid saying it. This is hardly a condemnation. Of this, Clown would have to agree.

[elklindo69]

Amazing, the White House basically said the News Paper had the attack coming for offending Muslims, although they quickly add they condone the attacks they do understand why it happened.

On September 19, 2012 at the White House daily press briefing then press secretary Jay Carney condemned the judgement of Charlie Hebdo magazine for publishing “deeply offensive,” anti-Islamic cartoons.

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/01/ ... lie-hebdo/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Breitbart!!!

Where fiction is non fiction!!!

:lol: