Political discussions about everything
#42134
The D.C. public school system spends $30,000.00 plus per student in k1-k12. Those that are pushed through the system to graduate still have a 50% illiteracy rate and dropout rate and either don't want to work or can't find a job because they have nothing offer, so they turn to government handouts and crime to survive after tax payers have spent around 400K for each of their 12 years of forced liberal indoctrination.

What if we just give each D.C. child 30K a year starting at the age of 5 instead of making them ride a bus to and from holding areas? Imagine a family with 5 kids cost tax payers 150,000.00 per year (just for schooling, food, shelter and Obama phones cost extra). Why not just give that family 200K a year? Skip all the games, I'm betting the crime rate would go down and the 200K a year for that family is far less than what they're costing the tax payers now, not to mention the victims that they stack up over the years.
#42156
In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.
#42189
In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.
#42206
In an ideal world, in some dream of Fabian Socialism, single payer would be logical.

However, nobody resides in such an ideal world.

Look at the affirmative action socialist Obama and his utter incompetence.

Obamacare is so bad that it would have been cheaper to simply have the federal government pay all the medical bills of those poor souls seeking to enroll.
#42215
He CAN'T help it.

A Scientologist told me you have to talk to people at their "tone" level; that they can't understand anything above their level.

It sounded like crap, but now I see he is right.

After various trials, I finally hit upon the low third grade "tone" level of johnforbes and since then we have been getting along famously.
He lacks the education and life experience to refute a thing I post. All he has in his intellectual arsenal is:

"You are."
"No, you are."
"No, you are."
"I know you are, but what am I?"

johnny's happy as a brain-dead clown drooling on is shoes now.
#42224
To be fair, Kafka didn't know trials better than Clownhicker.

Clownhicker lacks the education and life experience to refute a thing I post.

All he has in his intellectual arsenal is nothing because Clownhick has no intellect, not to mention no arsenal.

The sad reality is that nobody ever read one of Clownhick's postings.
#42229
All he has in his intellectual arsenal is nothing because Clownhick has no intellect, not to mention no arsenal.
Clown just likes to get spanked, the other liberals have taken to the hills, conservatives own this board. :D
#42231
I will make a cashout offer to Clownhicker.

If he will stop posting here, I will pay Clownhicker a wage of one dollar per hour for his landscaping duties.

I am presently giving him 80 cents per hour. He isn't worth that, of course, but I'm generous.
#42245
Clownhick has staggered many times.

I will make a cashout offer to Clownhicker.

If he will stop posting here, I will pay Clownhicker a wage of one dollar per hour for his landscaping duties.

I am presently giving him 80 cents per hour. He isn't worth that, of course, but I'm generous.
#42283
Welfare is a bad thing regardless of race.

It destroys initiative and drive.

Look at the tens of thousands of illegal immigrant kids recently added to the 12 million illegals here.

All those kids will spend decades supported by various American welfare programs courtesy of the overtaxed American taxpayer.
#42286
The vast majority of welfare recipients are white.
Let me correct that for you,the vast majority of blacks are welfare recipients. We all know the reason why, liberals don't feel they're capable of caring for themselves so they treat them like pets.

Blacks that break their liberal chains do quite well for themselves.
#42302
That's just not true, the majority of blacks are not on welfare.
In FY 2010, 31.8% of TANF families were white, 31.9% were African-American, and 30.0% were Hispanic.[28]
Now remember that whites are a much larger percentage of the population. So again the vast majority of people receiving welfare are white. Maybe you should spend your day wringing your hands about all those lazy white people?
#42303
Benny, your own posts shows that blacks received 31.9% of the social benefits although they're only 13% of the population.

Pew research also shows Democrats are twice as likely as Republicans to be on food stamps.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/20 ... ecipients/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The politics and demographics of food stamp recipients

.
Democrats are about twice as likely as Republicans to have received food stamps at some point in their lives—a participation gap that echoes the deep partisan divide in the U.S. House of Representatives, which on Thursday produced a farm bill that did not include funding for the food stamp program.

Overall, a Pew Research Center survey conducted late last year found that about one-in-five Americans (18%) has participated in the food stamp program, formally known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. About a quarter (26%) lives in a household with a current or former food stamp recipient.

Of these, about one-in-five (22%) of Democrats say they had received food stamps compared with 10% of Republicans. About 17% of political independents say they have received food stamps.

The share of food stamp beneficiaries swells even further when respondents are asked if someone else living in their household had ever received food stamps. According to the survey, about three in ten Democrats (31%) and about half as many Republicans (17%) say they or someone in their household has benefitted from the food stamp program.

But when the political lens shifts from partisanship to ideology, the participation gap vanishes. Self-described political conservatives were no more likely than liberals or moderates to have received food stamps (17% for each group), according to the survey.

Beyond politics, equally large or larger gaps emerge in the participation rates of many core social and demographic groups. For example, women were about twice as likely as men (23% vs. 12%) to have received food stamps at some point in their lives. Blacks are about twice as likely as whites to have used this benefit during their lives (31% vs. 15%). Among Hispanics, about 22% say they have collected food stamps.
Big Beautiful Ballroom

Johnnie.... So it cost 400 MILLION DOLLARS […]

I hear the jury found the guy not guilty. Apparent[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Red state gun murder rate....

So that's when Sparkles was recruited as a traitor[…]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]

Exposing wife in phoenix

Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]