[Intrepid]

But we already knew that.

Last week Chelsea Clinton Mezvinsky was awarded a phoney Ph.D degree from Oxford University for being the daughter of a former draft dodging student who grew up to become a rapist and serial sexual predator and president presiding over the most embarrassing administration in the history of the United States. It remains to be seen if it was the most criminal and corrupt. The current Dear Leader is giving him a run for it.

Now lets take a look at the background of her new husband. If this wasn't every bit as much of an arranged marriage as any that take place in India or among the royals of long ago Europe, than I'm the Sultan of Brunei.

Edward "Ed" Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937. You probably don't know Ed Mezvinsky?

He is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa's 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon. He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a #$%$ and a disgrace to politics and the nation and should be impeached.

He and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for many years.

Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him. In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton’s controversial tax package through the House of Representatives. In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud.

Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams. He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison. After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008 and remains on federal probation.

To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims.

Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton's father-in law. Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment. Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media?

If this guy was Jenna or Barbara Bush's, or better yet, Sarah Palin's daughter's father-in- law, the news would be an everyday headline and every detail would be reported over and over.

And yet liberals say there are no double standards in political reporting. And people are already talking about Hillary as our next President!

[Clownkicker]

"Now lets take a look at the background of her new husband"-Insipid

Well, we're still waiting for some background on her husband.

Apparently Insipid couldn't actually find any dirt on Chelsea's husband.

Such dishonest and irrelevant innuendo is worthy of johnforbes.




(Now that I've yanked Insipid's leash, let's watch him come foaming at the mouth and ranting nonsense for us. And he still won't have a thing to say about Chelsea's husband.)

[johnforbes]

Clownhicker's insinuations are unworthy of us all.

But then Clownhick is intrinsically unworthy.

Clownhicker's nose, for example, is the reason for the legal phrase "error on the face."

[Intrepid]

I can say this Junkie Pothead Stoner ClownDicker: Chelsea's new husband comes from stock every bit as distinguished, well refined and respected as is her family.

That is, not at all.


Now, for heaven's sake, please try to come up with something of your own rather than recycling things I direct at you.
That may be difficult for someone whose brain has been so abused by the sacred herb.


Like, wow man....

[Clownkicker]

Come up with something of my own?
But you didn't come up with anything of your own.
You simply regurgitated the propaganda of your handlers without any critical thought given to it.

I haven't got anything bad to say about the man.
And neither do you.

Am I to assume all your children are assholes just because you are?

[johnforbes]

It has been said before but, like every syllable spoken by Mr. Forbes, it bears repeating.

Clownhicker's insinuations are unworthy of us all.

But then Clownhick is intrinsically unworthy.

Clownhicker's nose, for example, is the reason for the legal phrase "error on the face."
johnforbes Posts: 1861Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 5:23 pm

[johnforbes]

It has been said before but, like every syllable spoken by Mr. Forbes, it bears repeating.

Yes, yes it certainly does.

Clownhicker's insinuations are unworthy of us all.

But then Clownhick is intrinsically unworthy.

Clownhicker's nose, for example, is the reason for the legal phrase "error on the face."

[snakeoil]

Ah, good old Bill. I seem to be in the minority among my friends. I feel, that while he is not a felon (you can not be a felon because of a ruling in a civil contempt hearing) in my opinion he is a criminal. Also, in my opinion he is a sexual predator.

[Intrepid]

Well, yes Clinton IS a felon, but not for what he did while in office. He was TWICE given a date to report for induction into the armed services, and did not report. This is, "Failure to attend a troop movement," and is a much worse offense than being simply AWOL.
And of course he is a rapist and serial sexual predator. The feminists, so watchful and intent on anything involving offenses against women, could not care less when it comes to Bubba boy Clinton. Or Ted Kennedy for that matter.
It seems if you vote the right way on a woman's right to kill her unborn child, then one of their own has to be sacrificed every so often.

[johnforbes]

Apparently, the initial strategy on Monica Lewinsky was developed by Hillary.

Hilly planned to call Monica a nut and a slut.

Hillary called Monica a "narcissistic looney," but when DNA was found on the blue dress it turned out that Hillary was the one who was the narcissistic looney.

[RealJustme]

And of course he is a rapist and serial sexual predator. The feminists, so watchful and intent on anything involving offenses against women, could not care less when it comes to Bubba boy Clinton. Or Ted Kennedy for that matter.

A shift manager at a local Jack in the Box was fired for having sex with one of his new hire interns (she was 20, he was 26). She filed a sexual harassment lawsuit and won even though she admitted the sex was consensual, the court ruled that being a shift manager gave him influence over her and the sexual act amounted to sexual harassment.

Now imagine if the Jack in the Box CEO did what Bill Clinton had done to a young intern, you would have liberals screaming bloody murder for the CEO's head on a platter, firing wouldn't be enough, they would be demanding jail time. Bill Clinton is a low life predictor and liar, he should have been fired and jailed for abusing his public office.