[elklindo69]

The Democrats can't say, 'We're the great defenders of women's rights in the workplace and we will defend you against some kind of abusive boss that uses their position of authority to take advantage of a young women' when the leader of their party, the leading fundraiser in the country, is Bill Clinton, who was a perpetrator of that kind of sexual harassment. Anybody who wants to take money from Bill Clinton or have a fundraiser has a lot of explaining to do.

On Thursday in an interview with NewsMax TV when asked about Clinton, Paul had this to say: "Yeah, I mean, a predator -- a sexual predator, basically. Repetitive. There's ... at least a half a dozen public women who have come forward. Some of them did sue in the (workplace)." And, back in late January during an appearance on NBC's Meet the Press, Paul told host David Gregory: "There is no excuse for that and that is predatory behavior and it should be something, we shouldn’t want to associate with people who would take advantage of a young girl in his office.”

[johnforbes]

Bill Clinton took advantage in the workplace, as a powerful person, of a girl the age of his own daughter.

Imagine the moral outrage of the Left if a Repub president had done that.

Imagine the screams from the feminist groups.

But, let it be a Democrat, then they find it dandy for a president to get blowjobs in the Oval Office, then lie about it to the public, lie about it under oath to a federal grand jury, and lie about it under oath to a federal judge, and violate his oath as an attorney.

[RealJustme]

Bill Clinton took advantage in the workplace, as a powerful person, of a girl the age of his own daughter.

Imagine the moral outrage of the Left if a Repub president had done that.

If a Burger King shift leader had done that he would have rightfully been fired and the franchise sued. How Clinton can show his faced in public is beyond me, I thought for sure he would commit suicide after it all came out, especially after he lied under oath and called Monica a liar.

Had it not been for his semen on her dress, she would still be a lying bimbo right wing bimbo trying to taint the Clinton's good name. Liberals have no shame.

[sillydaddy]

Of course the libs on this site will recite their mantra,"So What".

[elklindo69]

Bill Clinton took advantage in the workplace, as a powerful person, of a girl the age of his own daughter.

Imagine the moral outrage of the Left if a Repub president had done that.

Imagine the screams from the feminist groups.

But, let it be a Democrat, then they find it dandy for a president to get blowjobs in the Oval Office, then lie about it to the public, lie about it under oath to a federal grand jury, and lie about it under oath to a federal judge, and violate his oath as an attorney.

Yes.

They will be adding "blow job" to the list of high crimes and misdemeanors....

:lol:

[elklindo69]

Bill Clinton took advantage in the workplace, as a powerful person, of a girl the age of his own daughter.

Imagine the moral outrage of the Left if a Repub president had done that.

If a Burger King shift leader had done that he would have rightfully been fired and the franchise sued. How Clinton can show his faced in public is beyond me, I thought for sure he would commit suicide after it all came out, especially after he lied under oath and called Monica a liar.

Had it not been for his semen on her dress, she would still be a lying bimbo right wing bimbo trying to taint the Clinton's good name. Liberals have no shame.

Well there is no sexual harassment because the relationship was consensual, nor was it criminal.

The tea party should be outraged about a multi million dollar investigation about a blow job...

[johnforbes]

Clinton took advantage in the workplace, as a powerful person, of a girl the age of his own daughter.

Imagine the moral outrage of the Left if a Repub president had done that.

Imagine the screams from the feminist groups.

But, let it be a Democrat, then they find it dandy for a president to get blowjobs in the Oval Office, then lie about it to the public, lie about it under oath to a federal grand jury, and lie about it under oath to a federal judge, and violate his oath as an attorney.

[RealJustme]

Well there is no sexual harassment because the relationship was consensual, nor was it criminal.

That's what all bosses say when busted for having sex with interns and those under them "hey they didn't fight me or tell me no"

[elklindo69]

But, let it be a Democrat, then they find it dandy for a president to get blowjobs in the Oval Office, then lie about it to the public, lie about it under oath to a federal grand jury, and lie about it under oath to a federal judge, and violate his oath as an attorney.

Did Clinton break the law by getting a blowjob???

Now how much did it cost the taxpayers for the investigation to prove that Clinton got a blowjob???

[elklindo69]

Well there is no sexual harassment because the relationship was consensual, nor was it criminal.

That's what all bosses say when busted for having sex with interns and those under them "hey they didn't fight me or tell me no"

So you are going to tell me that local prosecutors should conviene grand juries because bosses are getting blown by their interns?

How outrageous of a thought on a porn site, not to mention the waste of taxpayer dollars.

:lol:

[RealJustme]

So you are going to tell me that local prosecutors should conviene grand juries because bosses are getting blown by their interns?

Nope, but the boss should be fired and the organization sued.

[elklindo69]

So you are going to tell me that local prosecutors should convene grand juries because bosses are getting blown by their interns?

Nope, but the boss should be fired and the organization sued.

So should Clinton go back and sue the GOP for impeaching him because he received a blow job?

LMAO

[johnforbes]

Elkin, how lazy are you mentally?

Clinton's misuse of his intern was terrible; she was the age of his own daughter, and it was in the workplace, and he had control/influence over her career arc.

But Clinton's impeachment was because he lied under oath to the American people, to a federal judge, and to a federal grand jury.

Surely no amount of liberal rhetoric can blind a person to that simple reality?