No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK

No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32372

By BilboBagend - Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:50 am

- Wed Nov 13, 2013 11:50 am #32372

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is declining to revive Oklahoma's strict ultrasound law for women seeking abortions.

The justices said Tuesday they will let stand a state Supreme Court ruling that struck down the 2010 law passed by Oklahoma's legislature.

The measure required women seeking abortions to have an ultrasound exam and then have the image placed in front of them while the provider described the fetus.

Last week, the justices opted to let stand an Oklahoma court decision that struck down a separate law restricting drug-induced abortions.

The case is Pruitt v. Nova Health Systems, 12-1170.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32469

By josefalcanuckistani - Sat Nov 16, 2013 5:49 am

- Sat Nov 16, 2013 5:49 am #32469

Congratulations. The party of the self declared humanists have scored another victory for murdering the innocent. Now the good folks of Oklahoma can avoid having to see images of the baby they are about to murder.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32471

By BilboBagend - Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:04 am

- Sat Nov 16, 2013 6:04 am #32471

No, a victory for not having big government in our bedrooms and invading our bodies.

The vaginal ultrasound laws did nothing about abortion anyway. It was just rank bully government without any real purpose beyond bullying. Laws proposed and passed by nothing more than immoral bullies.

But, it's good to see you support purposeless big government requiring expensive medical procedures for no medical reason at all.

The modern Republican motto, big government to screw the people, but no government to help the people.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32548

By johnforbes - Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:03 pm

- Mon Nov 18, 2013 4:03 pm #32548

Computerized axial tomography of Josef's "brain" revealed only the outline of a hammer and a sickle.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32595

By Clownkicker - Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:41 am

- Wed Nov 20, 2013 2:41 am #32595

johnforbes is too stupid to realize he's ridiculing one of his own. :lol:

That isn't Joe Canadian, you dimwit.
It's just another conservative fraud like yourself.
Wake up and take your meds. You're too easily fooled in your unmedicated, glassy-eyed, befuddled state.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32605

By johnforbes - Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:35 am

- Wed Nov 20, 2013 8:35 am #32605

Joecanadian, I don't recognize that login name.

When you are new to the Internet, as I am, a lot of these handles are unknown.

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32608

By Clownkicker - Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:32 am

- Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:32 am #32608

"Joecanadian, I don't recognize that login name."-johnforbes

You're either lying or you're officially senile, old geezer.
So which is it johnny? :lol:

Re: No Vaginal Ultrasound Requirement in OK#32611

By johnforbes - Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:45 am

- Wed Nov 20, 2013 9:45 am #32611

Heavens to Betsy, such bifurcate thinking.