Political discussions about everything
By Grog
#29439
JustFreedBaghdadBobMeAlocicalman?

Is it a milestone or a millstone?

Young Brandon? Forbes? Silly(I hate niggers)Daddy? Any of you care to offer words of praise for your leader?
User avatar
By RealJustme
#29440
Grog, why don't you go out on a limb and express an opinion?

Do you feel the United States and our Allies will be safer if we help the rebels remove Assad...thus giving them control of the largest chemical weapons stockpile in the world?

It all boils down to that simple question.

This is a UN matter, that's why we pay billions into their budget every year. Even the damn UN idiots know it's not a good thing to help the rebels obtain control of those chemical weapon stockpiles.

What say you Grog?
User avatar
By brandon
#29451
Tired Old Dick will now share his wisdom concerning this matter.

Break it down for us man. Drop some of that knowledge on us.

Peace out nigga.

:mrgreen:
By johnforbes
#29462
This really is a classic case for the UN.

The UK has better sense than to get into Syria. France, well, there were some favorable remarks but then the population began to voice its views.

Even if the goal were to knock off Assad (and it isn't), that would likely place a pro-terrorist group in charge. And it would ignore the real issues -- such as Iran.

Didn't Obama and his minions listen to their own criticisms of Iraq????????
By sillydaddy
#29463
Approximately 1400 people were killed in the Syrian attack. Tragic, but that is not a great number for the urgency Obama is placing on it. On 9/11,2001..... 3000 people were killed and Bush waited until March,2003 to attack Iraq, and even then the intel on WMD was wrong. Obama and Congress need to wait and not repeat the mistakes of the past.
By Clownkicker
#29468
"On 9/11,2001..... 3000 people were killed and Bush waited until March,2003 to attack Iraq, and even then the intel on WMD was wrong."-sillydud

It took a year and a half to attack Iraq...BECAUSE THE TWO THINGS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER, CLOWN.
Iraq/Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11. Even Bush admitted that.
So how can you still be so ignorant when even a dimwit like W. gets it?

You parade your ignorance but think you just tossed out a "gotcha" zinger.
Pathetic, as always.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#29485
It took a year and a half to attack Iraq...BECAUSE THE TWO THINGS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER, CLOWN.
You mean John Kerry was lying when he said "There is no question Iraq supported the terrorist operation that attacked our Country, there is also no doubt they are training terrorists for future attacks" John Kerry voted for the war in Iraq which had 70% of the Country's support.

If Kerry was wrong then, why should we believe him now?
By elklindo69
#29493
RealJustme wrote:
It took a year and a half to attack Iraq...BECAUSE THE TWO THINGS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH EACH OTHER, CLOWN.
You mean John Kerry was lying when he said "There is no question Iraq supported the terrorist operation that attacked our Country, there is also no doubt they are training terrorists for future attacks" John Kerry voted for the war in Iraq which had 70% of the Country's support.

If Kerry was wrong then, why should we believe him now?
Bush lied!

garbage in garbage out....
By Grog
#29516
I must register some level of dismay at the dishonorable, dishonest and despicable distraction and diversion from JustFreedBaghdadBobMe's moment of dazzling triumph.

Oh well, you can't say I didn't try to offer him praise for his unparalleled achievement in relentless buffoonery.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#29517
Grog, why don't you go out on a limb and express an opinion?

Do you feel the United States and our Allies will be safer if we help the rebels remove Assad...thus giving them control of the largest chemical weapons stockpile in the world?

It all boils down to that simple question.

This is a UN matter, that's why we pay billions into their budget every year. Even the damn UN idiots know it's not a good thing to help the rebels obtain control of those chemical weapon stockpiles.

What say you Grog?
By Grog
#29518
This isn't the thread for that. This is to celebrate your board-wide achievement. I was sure, or at least hoping that some of your acolytes like Forbes, Young Brandon and Silly would chime in to offer you praise and congratulations. And I was also hoping that Leroy might break his current confinement to at least put up a drive-by post before the nurses recaptured him.
By Grog
#29537
I don't get it, JustFreedBaghdadBobMe; Several of your followers, most notably Forbes and Silly have checked in and none of them have stopped by to congratulate you. Are they being stoic or what?
User avatar
By RealJustme
#29542
I don't get it, JustFreedBaghdadBobMe; Several of your followers, most notably Forbes and Silly have checked in and none of them have stopped by to congratulate you. Are they being stoic or what?
Congratulate me for stating the obvious?
Big Beautiful Ballroom

Johnnie.... So it cost 400 MILLION DOLLARS […]

I hear the jury found the guy not guilty. Apparent[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Red state gun murder rate....

So that's when Sparkles was recruited as a traitor[…]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]

Exposing wife in phoenix

Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]