UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical weapons

UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical weapons#29515

By RealJustme - Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:40 am

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:40 am #29515

AP- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon was questioned as to why it's taking so long to test the samples collected in Syria, considering the United States determined immediately after the event it was banned chemical weapons used. Ki-moon explained that testing the samples takes several weeks to be certain of what was used and that the United States is going off of what they've been told by questionable sources and remote intelligence rather than basing their analysis on science and facts. He cautioned that even if it is determined banned chemical weapons were used, the UN has been presented with conflicting evidence as to who may used them. Ki-moon emphasize he has reason to question what he called "massaged evidence" presented by the United States.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29520

By johnforbes - Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:23 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:23 pm #29520

If the House doesn't defeat Obama's lunacy, history will not look with kindness on this sort of crazy behavior.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29524

By RealJustme - Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:43 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:43 pm #29524

I will be for voting anyone in the House or the Senate that supports Obama's lunacy out of office.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29528

By Grog - Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:24 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 7:24 pm #29528

Now all the sudden the diplomat-scholar dual tag team of JustFreedBaghdadBobMe and his erstwhile esquire and escort, Forbes, are concerned about what the U.N. says?

It is a delight!

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29538

By sillydaddy - Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:14 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 8:14 pm #29538

The Russians see what an incompetent idiot we have in Obama and want him to remain President of the US.....that's good for them. So they decided to intervene on his behalf and defuse the situation with Syria. Knowing Obama he is positioning himself to take full credit for saving the world from chemical weapons.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29539

By Grog - Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:13 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 9:13 pm #29539

Or, in the real world, Putin was the one who blinked.

But, that doesn't fit with the Fox Nation narrative or conservative beliefs, so it can't be the case.

Where's JustFreedBaghdadBobMe with his expert and learned analysis? Is he still Skyping with Forbes? Jeez. How many times do they have to do "it?"

You know you can say "no" once in a while, Forbes.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29540

By RealJustme - Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:12 pm

- Mon Sep 09, 2013 10:12 pm #29540

Where's JustFreedBaghdadBobMe with his expert and learned analysis?

Sadly we should put more trust in Putin and the UN than Obama on matters concerning Syria.

Re: UN says not possible U.S. can be certian on chemical wea#29563

By johnforbes - Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:00 pm

- Tue Sep 10, 2013 6:00 pm #29563

It only happens every so often, but the situation in Syria is ideal for the UN to do something.

Or be totally consigned to futility.

Kerry and Obama both came to public notice as anti-war people. Kerry reviled an entire generation of veterans with his lies. Obama supporters called Bush every name in the book for invading Iraq.

Now suddenly, with very iffy "evidence," with no allies, with no congressional support, with no strategic vision, with no exit plan, Kerry and Obama want to strike Syria.

The irony would be delicious were the matter not serious.