Political discussions about everything
By BilboBagend
#25417
According to both Ann Coulterand Michelle Bachman, the problem is that if the House passes any immigration bill then the House and Senate bills will go to conference where a bill representing the will of the people will be created. Then, up and down votes in the Senate and the House will pass immigration reform based on the will of the people rather than the narrow bill required by a few prejudiced bullies.

They are in fact most probably correct.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25420
We already have immigration laws in this Country, the problem is liberals and people who want to come to this Country are ignoring the laws. I'm totally against passing a Bill to erase our current immigration laws because people have been breaking those laws. So if Congress tells the 20 million or so illegals they can break our immigration laws and still be able to remain in the United States, what good is it to pass new immigration laws?

That's the problem.
By BilboBagend
#25431
We had laws in the 1940s whereby people like justupid were institutionalized and sterilized. Did that make those laws correct, just, and HUMANE?

I'll have to think on that considering the evidence presented on this board every day by the low intelligence, paranoid, psychotics calling themselves "conservatives" every day.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25434
We had laws in the 1940s whereby people like justupid were institutionalized and sterilized. Did that make those laws correct, just, and HUMANE?
Millions legally immigrate to the United States every year under our current immigration laws. Please explain what is " Inhumane" about our immigration laws?
By BilboBagend
#25473
Do you always feel the need to prove your essential bigotry by feigning ignorance and stupidity? Ok, no feigning involved.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25476
Just as I thought you can't give one example of how our current immigration laws are inhumane. Liberals are pretending we don't have immigration laws so must past some. :lol: :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#25574
RealJustme wrote:Just as I thought you can't give one example of how our current immigration laws are inhumane. Liberals are pretending we don't have immigration laws so must past some. :lol: :lol: :lol:
You stupid clowns would go ape shit bananas if Obama actually used the full potential to go after businesses that were violating the tax code to cover for illegals.

morons!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25575
You stupid clowns would go ape shit bananas if Obama actually used the full potential to go after businesses that were violating the tax code to cover for illegals
Yes the stupid clowns would go ape shit if went after businesses covering for illegals, but conservatives would applaud the action. I would like to see a law passed that if a business hires an illegals that the business is responsible for any social costs for the illegal's family such as medical care, housing, food stamps and education. Since it's 25K per child average per year for a child in America, an illegal with 3 children would result in 75K a year in education costs alone to the business. But the stupid clowns would never go along with those fines.
By BilboBagend
#25603
It's really very simple. Our immigration policies should be based upon 1) or economic needs, and 2) our sense of humanity. We do neither and have an immigration policy based on long undesired feelings of racism and fear of losing a WASP majority. If we simply fixed the current problems of giving citizenship to those who are clearly innocent and deserve citizenship, provide a path o those long established, and instituted primarily policies that reflect the economic needs of the U.S. and our humanitarian refuge feelings as a secondary all problems would cease as there would be no room for those who are in the country illegally. Simple supply and demand economics in a free labor market. No second class workers. All above board.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25622
It's really very simple. Our immigration policies should be based upon 1) or economic needs, and 2) our sense of humanity.
It already is. It's certainly not in our economic interest to bring 20 million more uneducated people onto the social welfare system. An illegal tomato picker costs tax payers over 100K a year because they bring with them large families that we have to feed, educate, house then in most cases jail at some point for crimes. If a farmer wants to hire a tomato picker that's an illegal because he'll work for $3.00 less an hour under the table than that farmer should be sent the bill for the social costs for the illegals' family.
By BilboBagend
#25625
You could be wrong. Then again, you are wrong in the sense that you talk out of your ass with only your bigotry to guide you.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25630
You could be wrong. Then again, you are wrong in the sense that you talk out of your ass with only your bigotry to guide you.
What bigotry?
User avatar
By RealJustme
#25665
Do you understand the word "bigotry"?
You apparently think it applies when someone disagrees with the President.
Big Beautiful Ballroom

Johnnie.... So it cost 400 MILLION DOLLARS […]

I hear the jury found the guy not guilty. Apparent[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]

Red state gun murder rate....

So that's when Sparkles was recruited as a traitor[…]

Farewell Tour

Superb thread. When the history of the early days[…]

Exposing wife in phoenix

Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]