[Leroy]

http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pu ... _TR923.pdf

Exploring Patterns of Behaviour in Violent Jihadist Terrorists

An analysis of six significant terrorist conspiracies in the UK

By
Lindsay Clutterbuck, Richard Warnes

[Leroy]

Yea, I was sure that you liberals and Islamic Terrorist supporters would not provide any substantive feedback on the article.

[Clownkicker]

Yea, I was sure that Leroy and his supporters would not provide any substantive commentary on the article.

As we can see, not a one of them had a thing to say about it, including the clown who is pretending to lead a discussion of the report.
Nada...zilch...the entire contents of the reactionary mind.

[RealJustme]

Jihadists are a very big problem and some Governments are ignoring the threat.

It's turning out that our most recent terrorists were known to be Muslim extremist yet still allowed into the United States, placed on welfare and provided full ride scholarships in our universities while they plotted to kill us. After being warned by the Saudis and Russians that one of them was a terrorist our Government flushed the information down the toilet and increased his welfare payments. Then when they did kill Americans once again our Government actually attempted to "cover" for them.

Thank God for the work of the Boston police or homeland security would be handing out wanted posters of white extremists wanted for questioning concerning the Boston bombing.

We need to send so called "muslim students" who are drawing welfare and on full ride scholarships in every large city in the United States back to their Countries. Why the Obama Administration has increased federally funded scholarship funding for those from Muslim Countries by over 400% since he's been in office should sound alarms.

[Leroy]

Yea, I was sure that Leroy and his supporters would not provide any substantive commentary on the article.

As we can see, not a one of them had a thing to say about it, including the clown who is pretending to lead a discussion of the report.
Nada...zilch...the entire contents of the reactionary mind.

Ah, asswipe, I have plenty to say on it, but, as usual, liberals don't like being confronted with truths that they can't easily dispute with falsehoods or misdirection or where they have to put forth ANY effort to learn they were always wrong.

[Clownkicker]

"I have plenty to say on it,"- Leroy

And yet you said exactly as much as the liberals said on the topic, which is nothing.
But for some reason you single out liberals who behaved identically to everyone else here.

What makes you worse than everyone else here is that it's your thread topic and still you had nothing to contribute on the subject.
What a moron.

[Leroy]

"I have plenty to say on it,"- Leroy

And yet you said exactly as much as the liberals said on the topic, which is nothing.
But for some reason you single out liberals who behaved identically to everyone else here.

What makes you worse than everyone else here is that it's your thread topic and still you had nothing to contribute on the subject.
What a moron.

The moron is one who comments in a thread without saying anything ON TOPIC, like you have, twice.

[Clownkicker]

"The moron is one who comments in a thread without saying anything ON TOPIC, like you have, twice."-Leroy

Idiot, you just described yourself on this thread. :lol:

[Leroy]

"The moron is one who comments in a thread without saying anything ON TOPIC, like you have, twice."-Leroy

Idiot, you just described yourself on this thread. :lol:

It's amazing how you can't look at your replies and see that you've not been ON TOPIC in this thread at all - it shows a lot about you and your true intent in posting.

[Clownkicker]

Leroy, it's amazing how you can't look at your replies and see that you've not been ON TOPIC in this thread at all - it shows a lot about you and your true intent in posting.

[Leroy]

Leroy, it's amazing how you can't look at your replies and see that you've not been ON TOPIC in this thread at all - it shows a lot about you and your true intent in posting.

You're as expected, dishonest, malignant, and completely a troll - I created the TOPIC. You have not commented "On Topic" yet.

[Clownkicker]

"I created the TOPIC."-Leroy

But of course, you created nothing.
You copied what someone else created and you simply posted it verbatim without comment.

But lets not argue that sad fact.
Whether you 'created' the topic or not, you still have not commented on it.
What you said was "The moron is one who comments in a thread without saying anything ON TOPIC, like you have, twice."
You have done exactly that for five posts.

Then you say "You have not commented "On Topic" yet."-Leroy
Neither have you, you moron.
Come on, Leroy, make a bigger fool of yourself.

[Leroy]

Yea, I was sure that Leroy and his supporters would not provide any substantive commentary on the article.

As we can see, not a one of them had a thing to say about it, including the clown who is pretending to lead a discussion of the report.
Nada...zilch...the entire contents of the reactionary mind.

As we can see, your first comment was nothing, only to argue, and without arguing anything on topic - you type ALWAYS fails to see that you are what you claim others are , but there it is, your first comment in the thread quoted, and it shows that you've not been on topic since.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^This is what you do when you know you called yourself a moron.
You divert by pointing fingers at someone else.

Regardless of what I did, Leroy, it doesn't change the fact that you called yourself a moron in your own words.

Live with it, moron.

[Leroy]

^^^^^^This is what you do when you know you called yourself a moron.
You divert by pointing fingers at someone else.

Regardless of what I did, Leroy, it doesn't change the fact that you called yourself a moron in your own words.

Live with it, moron.

No matter what you claim, it's obvious that you can't post on topic, making YOU a moron. I've posted ON TOPIC in this thread, you have not, not once, clearly making you a moron.

[Vj2]

Actually neither of you have which is the kickers point clown

[Leroy]

Actually neither of you have which is the kickers point clown

My initial post created the TOPIC and my second post addressed that you libs won't talk about it, also on topic.

Nothing that Clownasslicker has posted has been on topic yet, much like your post.

[Clownkicker]

"My initial post created the TOPIC and my second post addressed that you libs won't talk about it, also on topic."-Leroy

And my first post addressed that you conservatives won't talk about it, also on topic.
If saying libs won't talk about it is on topic, then saying conservatives also won't talk about it is just as topical, you moron.

[Leroy]

"My initial post created the TOPIC and my second post addressed that you libs won't talk about it, also on topic."-Leroy

And my first post addressed that you conservatives won't talk about it, also on topic.
If saying libs won't talk about it is on topic, then saying conservatives also won't talk about it is just as topical, you moron.

There is nothing to discuss for Conservatives, we, as a group, already understand the threat Islam poses on the world, the only argument comes from the dishonest, the liberals, the progressives - like you. So, you against post off-topic.

[Clownkicker]

"There is nothing to discuss for Conservatives,..."-Leroy

Then why are you starting a discussion thread on the subject if there is nothing to discuss, you moron?
The answer is, you're simply a troll. You're trying to get liberals to discuss it while you only intend to attack and insult them if they try. You had no intention of contributing to the discussion on your own thread since "There is nothing to discuss for Conservatives" on this topic.

That's the very definition of a troll.

[Leroy]

"There is nothing to discuss for Conservatives,..."-Leroy

Then why are you starting a discussion thread on the subject if there is nothing to discuss, you moron?
The answer is, you're simply a troll. You're trying to get liberals to discuss it while you only intend to attack and insult them if they try. You had no intention of contributing to the discussion on your own thread since "There is nothing to discuss for Conservatives" on this topic.

That's the very definition of a troll.

It's funny that you're not smart enough to see that you're stupid.

The thread was meant to incite discussion from LIBERALS, dumbass. So far, the only comments from Liberals have been off-topic.

As soon as there was something rational in a reply from a Liberal I would have engaged them in conversation, but, as you've proven, liberals are not interested in rational discussion - they can't lie, misdirect, or be dishonest in a "rational" discussion.

[Clownkicker]

It's funny that you're not smart enough to see that you're stupid.

"The thread was meant to incite discussion from LIBERALS,..."-Leroy

Thank you for admitting you were trolling.
You're just too stupid to understand you just admitted it.

"As soon as there was something rational in a reply from a Liberal I would have engaged them in conversation,..."-Leroy

How you could possibly do that when you just admitted that there is nothing for a conservative to discuss on this topic?
You do understand what "nothing to discuss" means, don't you?
Or were you simply lying again and now you admit that there is indeed something for Conservatives to discuss on this subject and thus I was on topic in my first post?

[Leroy]

It's funny that you're not smart enough to see that you're stupid.

"The thread was meant to incite discussion from LIBERALS,..."-Leroy

Thank you for admitting you were trolling.
You're just too stupid to understand you just admitted it.

"As soon as there was something rational in a reply from a Liberal I would have engaged them in conversation,..."-Leroy

How you could possibly do that when you just admitted that there is nothing for a conservative to discuss on this topic?
You do understand what "nothing to discuss" means, don't you?
Or were you simply lying again and now you admit that there is indeed something for Conservatives to discuss on this subject and thus I was on topic in my first post?

I see you're showing that you're not smart enough to comprehend - the point of the thread was to get discussion from liberals, based on their VIEWS, as the Conservative view is already know. It's interesting to watch liberals justify their hypocrisy, their lies, their hate, their dishonesty. It's even interesting watching you twist and run around in circles to keep from discussing things that bring out your hate, dishonesty, hypocrisy....

The only Trolling has been from those that comment off-topic, to avoid the discussion - that would be YOU.

[BilboBagend]

The paper pretty well describes the behavior of our own liar leroy.