Leroy wrote:elklindo69 wrote:What percentage of votes have been found to be fraudlent?
The 0.002% difference wouldn't have helped out Mitt the Twittster win the presidential election....
Ah, the denial - then why not let us require positive ID if you think there is no fraud or little fraud?
The fact is that I know there was fraud in Ohio, where precincts only registered votes for Obama, not a single vote for any other candidate - and for the preceding 20 years, it was almost always 70/30 in those precincts.
It's a hardship to certain segments of the population to obtain government issued ID cards.
Senior citizens, disabled folks, low income, minority, and so fourth.
It's unquestionable that there's absolutely no reason to have voter ID laws.