brandon wrote:All Muslims.Actually, if you follow action vs names, they are radical left wing liberals. Liberals, at their worst, are violent and not tolerant of anyone or anything thing that disagrees with them. We've seen countless examples of this for decades as well as the latest examples of Occupy WallStreet, MoveOn.org, Organizing for America, ACORN....
They are all conservative religious extremists. Muslims fighting the liberal world in the name of their God.
They are religious conservatives who are acting on their extreme conservative religious convictions.
brandon wrote:Sure they are Leroy. I'm sure they see the western world as too conservative and want to liberalize and modernize it to be more like theirs.Have you looked at the people/groups calling themselves "Liberals" in the last couple decades? They are the most intolerant, most hate filled, most violent, groups of all time. Conservatives are willing to live and let live for the most part, but Liberals are completely unwilling to accept a live and let live society.
Religious liberals on jihad.
If you say so.
You're fucked in the head. And your 're in denial.
BilboBagend wrote:Radical extremist conservatives out to destroy the world love to point fingers at opposing radical extremest conservatives out out destroy the world and never, ever admit their own role in the cycle of hatred and violence. That is the defining factor of these racists and bigots like liar leroy.Notice how the resident board malignant tumor can only make personal attacks when he can't dispute the facts/truth of a threads topic.
BilboBagend wrote:Only pointing out your history liar leroy. Your lies, bigotry, and racism are infamous. You prove it every time you start one of your anti-Muslim threads. Your hate mongering is quite easy to see, quite consistent.I've asked many time, because you make this claim, for you to post my lies, racism or bigotry, in context, and you've never once been able to show that I've lied, not once.
All one need do is look at all the anti-Muslim hate threads you have started over the last 5 years. Is it about an average of 3 per day? or is it more, ,liar leroy?Leroy does have a valid point, Muslims fall into 4 groups:
The thousands of times you have said ALL Muslims are terrorists.
and that's just the surface of your anti-Muslim hate. They there is your anti-gay equality obsessions.
BilboBagend wrote:All one need do is look at all the anti-Muslim hate threads you have started over the last 5 years. Is it about an average of 3 per day? or is it more, ,liar leroy?Dildo, there you go again, as expected, lying.
The thousands of times you have said ALL Muslims are terrorists.
and that's just the surface of your anti-Muslim hate. They there is your anti-gay equality obsessions.
BilboBagend wrote:Keep proving my point liar leroy. You do it so well.I guess that someone should try and help you, since you can't prove your point, not one of them.
BilboBagend wrote:Keep proving my point liar leroy. You do it so well.Still waiting on you to prove your claims, and as usual, over the years, you've been unable to prove anything you claim.
BilboBagend wrote:Keep it up attention whore. I'm not playing your disingenuous games,If you're not playing, then why not stop drawing attention to yourself and my posts? You can't help yourself, you have to bark like a dog each time I post, almost like I own you.... All you do is bark, never anything that makes sense, no proof of anything you claim, and you can't even control yourself - you add nothing to any thread, except to keep it near the top and to continue to draw attention to the thread. You are playing yourself son, and you're too stupid to see it. :lol:
Keep it up attention whore. I'm not playing your disingenuous games,In other words...Leroy blew Bilbo out of the water, bilbo wants this thread to go away. :lol:
brandon wrote:Ok, so they are intolerant religious liberals on jihad. What are they intolerant of and what is the goal of their jihad?No, my argument is that for a decade or more, liberals have show us what intolerance, hate, incitement to violence, racism, division, fear mongering, even more so in the last 5 years.
As I understand it they are intolerant of anyone who isn't a Muslim. And the goal of their jihad is to make everyone a Muslim. Am I wrong there?
So their goal is to make everyone a follower of their religion. Which is considered conservative to an extreme by the western and much of the rest of the world.
Your argument that because they are intolerant and use violent methods makes them 'liberals' falls flat Leroy. There are plenty of 'liberal' terror groups who use the same methods. But it is the goal of these religious extremist conservatives that makes them exactly what they are.
Twist it any way you want.
brandon wrote:You're talking in circles Leroy. Utter nonsense and bullshit.And yet you miss how LIBERALS/PROGRESSIVES want to "Convert" everyone to their way of thinking/ideals and are absolutely VIOLENT when they don't get their way or when you disagree with them.
It is their stated goal of converting everyone to their extremist conservative religion that makes them what they are.
Leroy wrote:And Obama refuses to link Terrorists to their Islamic followings/ideas.Re your title what about David *******? No mention of his religion. I'm gonna say not a Muslim. Therefore making your title misleading at best
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terror ... up-listing
Leroy wrote:Maybe you would like to comment on the rest of them being Muslim?Makes sense there's a war on terror don't ya know? I'd like to comment on your erroneous statement. Accuracy is all important wouldn't you agree?
Obama refuses to link Terrorists to their Islamic followings/ideas.
I have said that almost all terrorist acts in the world, in the last 20 years, have been committed by Muslims claiming to be following Islam.
failure to acknowledge that Islam is a source of violence around the globe only allows that violence to spread faster and further.
Leroy
In Jan 2013, Muslim attacks across 22 countries accounted for 931 innocent people being killed in the name of Islam. More than 1400 people were critically injured in these Islamic followers attacks on the innocent.
In 2012, Muslims, following Islam, killed more than 11,000 innocent people (across 57 countries) because of their belief in Islam
Islam is NOT about peace, it's about conquest and oppression, about intolerance.
The few muslims that are peaceful would be killed for their enlightened beliefs if they were to enter a Islamic dominated country.
Listen to the true muslims beliefs, this video makes it clear.
My point to this is that today's radical Islam is a corruption of the religion that Mohammed envisionedFirst of all there never was a Mohammed as they think of him, there were a bunch of people that got together and wrote a book of how they felt people should conduct themselves and called a "Koran". In that book it's very clear that Infidels are to be killed until they're wiped off of the planet. There are numerous other violent teachings in the Koran but it's only the radical Muslims that follow the Koran verbatim, those are the ones that are trying to exterminate Infidels. But rest assured the vast majority of Muslim would rejoice if they were suceed in killing all Infidels.
brandon wrote:Leroy, you started this thread condemning the President for not publicly linking Islamic Jihadists to their "Islamic followings/ ideas". Then when I call them religious conservatives to the extreme, you and your buddies lecture me that it is only the intolerant and violent methods they use that matter.You are confused, I've clearly linked, with their examples, to being Liberal Extremists. I've never said it's ONLY anything like you suggested, you're unable to comprehended more than one line at a time if you think that.
snakeoil wrote:Leroy suggested that I always come to the defense of Islam in a previous post. I might as well add a bit of fuel to his fire.I have not stated that you always come to defend Islam, just that you've ignored and waffled around it.
Leroy wrote:He could be a Muslim, he could be Emulating their tactics, he could be something other than Muslum...Well I want to address your inability to be accurate
The key thing here is that you've found ONE that "may" not be muslim, but you don't want to address that the TOP TERRORISTS in the USA seem to be "at least mostly" Muslim.
Vj2 wrote:More diversions from you VJ2. The spread of Islam increased during the 90's, and Clinton was treating their actions as POLICE actions, not terrorism, just as Odumbass is. You can't show a group as terrorists INSIDE a country when they are not acting like terrorists inside that country. There were few MUSLIM acts of terrorism until 1993, and even then it was miscategorized by a Liberal/Democrat administration. As we started allowing more and more muslims into the country, even under "refuge" programs that subverted the immigration process, we started seeing more and more attacks inside the USA from Muslims.Leroy wrote:He could be a Muslim, he could be Emulating their tactics, he could be something other than Muslum...Well I want to address your inability to be accurate
The key thing here is that you've found ONE that "may" not be muslim, but you don't want to address that the TOP TERRORISTS in the USA seem to be "at least mostly" Muslim.
The Muslim aspect of it was addressed by my saying that there is a war on terror. Coincidental that during WOT that the most wanted are Muslim? I think not. Who were the most wanted before the WOT? All Muslim? Take a look at the 1990's and you'll notice that the majority are non Muslim. So it seems to me that the nature of the view/er dictates what is seen?
- By divermouse
So that's when Sparkles was recruited as a traitor[…]
- By divermouse
What a putz. A sparkle pony patriot. Worthless wea[…]
- By uvgotmale970
Any interested voyeurs. We are looking to expose[…]
