[RealJustme]

...we would have the smartest children in the world and less crime in our innner cities. We need to start putting our children first over special interest groups and unions.

[Leroy]

...we would have the smartest children in the world and less crime in our innner cities. We need to start putting our children first over special interest groups and unions.

Because our teachers and administrators are not paid based on outcome, there will never be a quality education in our country, it's failed and is only made worse by lack of responsibility (liberal demand) and lack of actually caring about Country over Self (another liberal trait).

[elklindo69]

Conservatives advocate the teaching of creationism in our public schools. So they are not exactly stalwarts of scientific studies. And keep on denying that global warming doesn't exist, maybe all the thermometers are out of calibration, or perhaps the meteorological weather books were cooked up.

Have you wondered why the people from United States dominate in the winning of Nobel Prizes? They went to those 'liberal universities" in the United States....

:lol:

[Leroy]

Conservatives advocate the teaching of creationism in our public schools. So they are not exactly stalwarts of scientific studies. And keep on denying that global warming doesn't exist, maybe all the thermometers are out of calibration, or perhaps the meteorological weather books were cooked up.

Have you wondered why the people from United States dominate in the winning of Nobel Prizes? They went to those 'liberal universities" in the United States....

:lol:

And yet not a single person can show that MAN is a measurable cause of "Global Climate Change" which is a natural and cyclic event.

[RealJustme]

Have you wondered why the people from United States dominate in the winning of Nobel Prizes?

No, when Al Gore and Obama win Nobel Prizes it's self evident why they win...it's ran by flaming liberals. :lol:

[elklindo69]

Conservatives advocate the teaching of creationism in our public schools. So they are not exactly stalwarts of scientific studies. And keep on denying that global warming doesn't exist, maybe all the thermometers are out of calibration, or perhaps the meteorological weather books were cooked up.

Have you wondered why the people from United States dominate in the winning of Nobel Prizes? They went to those 'liberal universities" in the United States....

:lol:

And yet not a single person can show that MAN is a measurable cause of "Global Climate Change" which is a natural and cyclic event.

Conservatives and science don't seem to mix.

So I'm not surprised that they believe something that has virtually no empirical data to support, the theory of relativity.

And they have no belief in something that is supported by 97% of climate scientists, who all agree that earth temperatures have increased due to consumption of fossil fuels.

So eventually this debate will be non existent, because scientists will convince the remaining skeptics, or the temperatures will increase so rapidly that no other rationally sane person would deny that it is occurring. Unless conservatives can prove that the 1. temperature data is incorrect 2. the rulers that measure sea levels are incorrect 3. The instruments that measure CO2 levels in the ice and atmosphere are incorrect 4. The rates of increasing CO2 levels which are increasing at a much faster rate than the historical levels are incorrect.

[elklindo69]

Have you wondered why the people from United States dominate in the winning of Nobel Prizes?

No, when Al Gore and Obama win Nobel Prizes it's self evident why they win...it's ran by flaming liberals. :lol:

Gore and Obama won the 'nobel PEACE prize'

I think you know the difference between a 'nobel prize' and the 'nobel PEACE prize' ..... right :lol:

[Leroy]

Conservatives and science don't seem to mix.

So I'm not surprised that they believe something that has virtually no empirical data to support, the theory of relativity.

And they have no belief in something that is supported by 97% of climate scientists, who all agree that earth temperatures have increased due to consumption of fossil fuels.

So eventually this debate will be non existent, because scientists will convince the remaining skeptics, or the temperatures will increase so rapidly that no other rationally sane person would deny that it is occurring. Unless conservatives can prove that the 1. temperature data is incorrect 2. the rulers that measure sea levels are incorrect 3. The instruments that measure CO2 levels in the ice and atmosphere are incorrect 4. The rates of increasing CO2 levels which are increasing at a much faster rate than the historical levels are incorrect.

You really are an idiot sometimes

We can have Global Warming or Global Climate Change without man being any measurable factor in it.

Historical levels, if you go back far enough, show that the climate has changed far faster and far worse than this, several times.

[RealJustme]

And they have no belief in something that is supported by 97% of climate scientists, who all agree that earth temperatures have increased due to consumption of fossil fuels.

Bullshit! Anyone who thinks a carbon tax on consumption is going to change the climate should be put into a database and be denied access to weapon purchases...the world would be safer.

[Leroy]

And they have no belief in something that is supported by 97% of climate scientists, who all agree that earth temperatures have increased due to consumption of fossil fuels.

I noticed, just now, that you properly framed this: BELIEF

It's interesting how none of those 97% can provide clear and concise data to prove their BELIEF. You know, Consensus is also BELIEF, as it can't be proven for one or more reasons.

Why is it that ever published study that claims Man is the cause, the measured cause, can't do it without ignoring data, without faking data, without outright lying, and why is it that every group that claims it, they come up with their conclusion with different data, yet none of them can PROVE IT, and none of them can state how much Man has caused vs. what is part of the Cycle that happens for all of time?

[RealJustme]

It's interesting how none of those 97% can provide clear and concise data to prove their BELIEF.

So where did this famous “consensus” claim that “97% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to a few select scientists.

The one question was is it "possible" or "impossible" man may in some way contribute to climate change. The select group checked possible since you very rarely get a scientist to say something is so vague is "impossible".

Since 1998, more than 31,000 American scientists from diverse climate-related disciplines, including more than 9,000 with Ph.D.s, have signed a public petition announcing their belief that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” Included are atmospheric physicists, botanists, geologists, oceanographers, and meteorologists. Among those are some who were misrepresented in the "endlessly" survey.

Now that we have the facts in the way of Elk's rants, watch him go off. :lol: