- Sun Jun 10, 2012 2:32 pm
#15
Based on what has been published here on VW and Igor's apparent new site, here's my theory on what went down:
1) Igor was unhappy with how the business he was working for was being managed.
2) Igor decides to leave and start a competing business more in line with his vision.
I'm with him so far, this is all above board assuming he didn't sign any non-compete agreement.
3) Igor decides to sabotage his employer on the way out the door and plans this out well in advance.
3a) He steals the membership and username and password database. That's how he can give credit on his new site for RC/HC members.
3b) While still working for VW he courts submitters to defect to his new site.
3c) He (maybe) steals user submissions. Users retain rights to their submissions but it isn't clear yet if his new site has permission for all of the submissions. VW submitters should check to make sure that their work is not being stolen.
3d) He probably has stolen some of the software behind VW. His new site states "... helping us with some of his php-libraries, so we hadn't do all coding from scratch!", strongly implying that the code was appropriated. The look and feel of the new site closely mirrors VW, suggesting some stolen code.
3e) He sabotages the VW websites, it sounds like for a time they were redirecting to his new site but he has clearly done enough damage that it will take them a lot of work to get it back up. Given his trusted status and that he has clearly been planning this he could have done extensive damage on his way out of the door.
I'm sure there are details we don't know yet, but it sounds like Igor really fucked up here. He could have made a graceful exit and started his competing website, but instead he decided to do a lot of damage on his way out the door probably trying to force VW out of business. Some of this is clearly illegal in most jurisdictions. If he had just started a new website which better met my needs I could see myself becoming a member, but I don't see myself giving money to somebody who would sabotage a popular website that I enjoy just because he's disgruntled at work.
Now the website I like visiting will be down for several days due to his sabotage and he expects me to just pop on over to his new site as though what he did was okay? Get real. I can go a few days without VW but I'm not going to support that kind of backstabbing.
Anybody else have thoughts?
1) Igor was unhappy with how the business he was working for was being managed.
2) Igor decides to leave and start a competing business more in line with his vision.
I'm with him so far, this is all above board assuming he didn't sign any non-compete agreement.
3) Igor decides to sabotage his employer on the way out the door and plans this out well in advance.
3a) He steals the membership and username and password database. That's how he can give credit on his new site for RC/HC members.
3b) While still working for VW he courts submitters to defect to his new site.
3c) He (maybe) steals user submissions. Users retain rights to their submissions but it isn't clear yet if his new site has permission for all of the submissions. VW submitters should check to make sure that their work is not being stolen.
3d) He probably has stolen some of the software behind VW. His new site states "... helping us with some of his php-libraries, so we hadn't do all coding from scratch!", strongly implying that the code was appropriated. The look and feel of the new site closely mirrors VW, suggesting some stolen code.
3e) He sabotages the VW websites, it sounds like for a time they were redirecting to his new site but he has clearly done enough damage that it will take them a lot of work to get it back up. Given his trusted status and that he has clearly been planning this he could have done extensive damage on his way out of the door.
I'm sure there are details we don't know yet, but it sounds like Igor really fucked up here. He could have made a graceful exit and started his competing website, but instead he decided to do a lot of damage on his way out the door probably trying to force VW out of business. Some of this is clearly illegal in most jurisdictions. If he had just started a new website which better met my needs I could see myself becoming a member, but I don't see myself giving money to somebody who would sabotage a popular website that I enjoy just because he's disgruntled at work.
Now the website I like visiting will be down for several days due to his sabotage and he expects me to just pop on over to his new site as though what he did was okay? Get real. I can go a few days without VW but I'm not going to support that kind of backstabbing.
Anybody else have thoughts?