[johnforbes]

Isn't it a bit odd that all four of the lawfare efforts against Trump began on the very same day, November 18, 2022?

[Clownkicker]

No, why do you ask?


Isn't it a bit odd that in all the myriad threads johnforbes initiates, there is never any rational discussion of the topic included?

Apparently all he can post are childish FOXnews-quality propaganda 'questions' for the dimwitted.

[johnforbes]

Because multiple incidents of lawfare commencing on the same date does seem odd.

Of course, Clownslacker's comments are always odd.

But, out of fairness, let's flip a coin -- heads I'm right, tails Clown is wrong.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^And there we have the wasted legal mind of johnforbes on display.

Firstly, dimwit, you don't discuss legal matters using silly partisan propaganda jargon such as "lawfare" and expect to be taken seriously.

But if you are going to talk like a child, then you should apply the term where it actually applies, which is in the Trump camp where they are fighting a legal war against Trump being held responsible for his crimes, not because he is innocent, but because he is guilty of the crimes he's charged with. They do this not by demonstrating that Trump didn't commit those crimes, but rather by a policy of frivolous delays and phony motions filed to try to run out the clock on the ability to hold Trump liable for those crimes. They do this by delaying in order to give Trump time to get re-elected President so that he can no longer be prosecuted for the crimes that johnforbes knows Trump committed. It's a legal war of attrition.

What should be noticed is that not once has johnforbes even bothered to assert that Trump is not guilty of the crimes he's charged with. This is because johnforbes knows perfectly well that Trump is guilty of every crime charged. He experienced for himself Trump committing those crimes in real time while consuming the news of the day. But all johnforbes ever does is try to explain why Trump shouldn't be put on trial for those crimes johnforbes witnessed, using pathetic arguments like "No Republican should ever be charged with a crime in New York because it is run by Democrats." johnforbes quite literally believes that Republicans should not be subject to the law in New York. He has said this several times concerning Trump due to his party affiliation. He is saying it once again with this thread. "Trump should be above the law because it seems odd to me that he should be charged for multiple crimes on a single day instead of on four different days." (As if that makes any difference whatsoever in Trump's guilt or innocence.)

johnforbes' defense of Trump has never been to assert that Trump didn't commit the crimes he is charged with; only that things are "odd" because it "seems odd" to johnforbes. (Well why didn't you say so, johnny? Let's all defer to johnforbes' feelings. Let's immediately stop all the trials because they "seem odd" to a 4th rate partisan legal mind which is unable to produce any other justification for his partisan views.) No other argument or point of discussion has been made by the board's partisan tool. johnforbes is incapable of mounting a discussion about anything beyond expressing his personal feelings absent of all facts in a given matter. As I have told him many times, this country does not run on his 'feelings'. Nobody cares what he (or anyone else) FEELS about it. They care whether or not there is a case to be made. And in every case filed, a Grand Jury found there was reason to believe that crimes had been committed and that Trump is the one who likely committed them.

Why johnforbes holds the U.S. legal system in such contempt is a mystery, given that he claims to be an officer of the court of that legal system. (But I guess we shouldn't be surprised to learn that johnforbes holds himself in contempt. I hold the partisan weasel in contempt too. Don't we all?)

[johnforbes]

Thanks to Clowntoker for the unsolicited praise of Mr Forbes.

Clown should not be surprised to be moved, on the spur of the moment, to praise the fine legal -- and non-legal -- mind of the fabulous Forbes.

Mr Forbes has the eloquence of Demosthenes, and the timing of Shecky Greene.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^^ There's that impotent shuck and jive routine we've all come to know and mock.

And his next 'witty comeback' will be to prance about in his Speedo for us all, insisting that men should stare at his legs and his arms and his muscles and his tan while pretending he isn't the flaming queen he is demonstrating himself to be.

That will be the comprehensive extent of his ability to discuss politics and law. If you doubt me, check out johnny's new gay-fixation thread bemoaning the unfairness of his having had to perform all those same acts behind closed doors in his youthful days in Frisco. Is there no justice? The Lady doth protest too much, methinks. (Fittingly, "Queen Gertrude" is johnny's stage name whenever he's doing his drag routine.)

[johnforbes]

Mr Forbes has never criticized Clownswisher for his deviant deranged partnership in pansy posses.

Nor for Clown's furious fixation on leftist lads.