[Clownkicker]

that there was no improper Democrat conspiracy in the investigation into Trump's Russia connections.

Trump's DOJ empowered John Durham to dig up evidence of improper actions in the Democrats' investigation into Trump's Russia connections. The investigation produced only one indictment, for witch the former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI.

So there was no improper conspiracy to investigate Trump's criminal obstruction of justice which was uncovered by Robert Mueller. No doubt johnforbes will be relieved that there is no corrupt 'Deep State' conspiracy here according to Trump Administration appointees.

https://www.rawstory.com/john-durham-2658209848/

[sillydaddy]

The investigation WAS the conspiracy...

[Clownkicker]

FINALLY, sillydummy admits that Trump's Republican investigation into the Democrats was a Republican conspiracy, but it STILL cleared the Democrats of wrongdoing, despite Trump's best efforts.

No doubt this admission is a huge weight off silly's guilty conscience for supporting conman Trump...

[johnforbes]

Speaking of huge weights, Clowntroller's belt supports a huge weight -- the enormity of Clown's pendulous belly.

As for history, Clown did his last situp on a foggy morning in March of 1937.

[sillydaddy]

weak comeback, Clown...

[Clownkicker]

Yes, that's what I said, silly.

Your characterization of the failed Trump White House investigation into Democrats as a "conspiracy" is indeed a "weak comeback," dummy.

You still don't get that you just admitted Trump was involved in a conspiracy to cover up his obstruction of justice. Instead, his investigation into Democrats came up with nothing (again) proving there was no conspiracy by Democrats. Trump's own guy said so.

Now, if you want to see a "weak comeback" all you need do is look at johnfibs' idiotic personal attack because once again he lacks the intellect to find fault with my post...

[johnforbes]

Not since James Joyce has there been prose as dense, and confounding, as Clown's cacophonous cluster of cranky crotchetiness.

[Clownkicker]

Another "weak comeback" by johnforbes.

Clearly, johnforbes is very relieved that Republicans could find no conspiracy by Democrats. He couldn't refute anything in my post.

Now, as with all Republican supporters, he is getting quite concerned about what that means about Trump's criminality.

[johnforbes]

Durham will never get a conviction if he has Democrat-appointed judges and Democrat donors on the jury as in the Sussmann case.

But give Democrats credit. They fight like crazed weasels to get their ideological agenda implemented.

Just look at modern California to witness the result -- massive illegal immigration, crime, drugs, homeless people sleeping on the street, huge debt, high taxes, etc.

[Clownkicker]

"Just look at modern California to witness the result -- massive illegal immigration, crime, drugs, homeless people sleeping on the street, huge debt, high taxes, etc."-johnflubs

johnny, you are describing Texas or Florida, dimwit.

[johnforbes]

Just look at modern California to witness the result -- massive illegal immigration, crime, drugs, homeless people sleeping on the street, huge debt, high taxes, etc.

The key to my description of California was the reference to California.

[Clownkicker]

Again, Trump supporters will be relieved to learn there was no improper Democrat conspiracy in the investigation into Trump's Russia connections:


"Analyst acquitted at trial over discredited Trump dossier

"A jury on Tuesday acquitted on all counts a think tank analyst accused of lying to the FBI about his role in the creation of a discredited dossier about former President Donald Trump.

"Despite hopes by Trump supporters that the prosecutor would uncover a sweeping conspiracy within the FBI and other agencies to derail his candidacy, and then his presidency, the investigation over the course of more than three years failed to produce evidence that met those expectations. The sole conviction — an FBI agent admitted altering an email related to the surveillance of a former Trump aide — was for conduct uncovered not by Durham but by the Justice Department’s inspector general, and the two cases that Durham took to trials ended in across-the-board acquittals."-AP

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 4fa5b2d13c

johnforbes is breathing a sigh of relief after pissing himself when his handlers told him there was a conspiracy against Trump.

[johnforbes]

These days, the purpose of a Special Counsel tends to be complex.

It takes the pressure off regular agencies.

It burns up years and removes the story from the news cycle.

In the case of Durham, he long ago declined to charge the main people like Comey and Strzok and McCabe, so it was no surprise that he went into pro-Democrat DC and pro-Democrat Alexandria and got no convictions.

Some fascinating stuff did emerge, such as the story that they offered a million bucks to Steele if he could prove anything in the dossier.

But why bother since the fake dossier had already served its purpose of deceiving a FISA judge into approving a wiretap on Trump?

The whole thing was a strange episode proving yet again that Lord Acton was correct.

[Clownkicker]

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men…"-Lord Acton

I'm really surprised that johnforbes would admit this about Trump, that Trump (who all Trump supporters consider to be a "great man") is a "bad man."

Such honesty from an unabashed Trump supporter is refreshing.

[johnforbes]

Actually, what Lord Acton said after meeting Clowntoker is more relevant here.

He said:

"Clowntroller is is a bad boy (nearly as bad as Corn Pop) and not great either."

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Yup, johnforbes realizes he made a fool of himself again.

Thus, another diversionary personal attack in lieu of a rational argument.

[johnforbes]

We all remember the day when Clowntroller met the dreaded Corn Pop in the parking lot.

Corn Pop carried a switchblade, and had soaked it in salt water so it would rust, or whatever it was Joe said.

But Clown carried a six-foot length of chain.

It was a mighty battle, and Clown's arms -- thin, pale, and as fragile as dry potato chips -- gleamed in the pale light.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Yup, johnforbes realizes he made a fool of himself again.

Thus, another diversionary personal attack in lieu of a rational argument.

[johnforbes]

History does not record whether Corn Pop waged a diversionary attack upon the defenses of the mighty Clowntroller on that fateful day in the parking lot of a swimming pool in Delaware.

What is certain is that Corn Pop was a bad boy.

But then Clowntroller back then was in peak condition, and had been in many fights.

Most of Clown's fights were two hit ones -- Clown got hit, and then Clown hit the ground.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Yup, johnforbes realizes he made a fool of himself again.

Thus, another diversionary personal attack in lieu of a rational argument.

[johnforbes]

Not at all.

Per contra, I was merely referring to history qua context.

History does not record whether Corn Pop waged a diversionary attack upon the defenses of the mighty Clowntroller on that fateful day in the parking lot of a swimming pool in Delaware.

What is certain is that Corn Pop was a bad boy.

But Clowntroller back then was in peak condition, and had been in many fights.

Most of Clown's fights were two hit ones -- Clown got hit, and then Clown hit the ground.

But let's be fair, Clown in those days could indeed do 5 one-arm curls with a 3-pound dumbbell.*

___________________
* Hopefully, Clown will forgive me for not making any dumbbell remarks since I also lift them multiple times a day, which is one reason my bronzed, toned somatic habitus is now gleaming in the twilight.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Yup, johnforbes realizes he made a fool of himself again.

Thus, another diversionary personal attack in lieu of a rational argument.

[johnforbes]

Not at all.

Per contra, I was merely referring to history qua context.

History does not record whether Corn Pop waged a diversionary attack upon the defenses of the mighty Clowntroller on that fateful day in the parking lot of a swimming pool in Delaware.

What is certain is that Corn Pop was a bad boy.

But Clowntroller back then was in peak condition, and had been in many fights.

Most of Clown's fights were two hit ones -- Clown got hit, and then Clown hit the ground.

[Clownkicker]

^^^^^^^ Yup, johnforbes realizes he made a fool of himself again.

Thus, another diversionary personal attack in lieu of a rational argument.

[johnforbes]

Not since Sonny Liston was hit by an invisible punch has this fine forum been so deceived.

[Clownkicker]

So quit yer incessant yammering already, dimwit.

We're tired of being deceived by you all the time.


On a brighter note, at least johnforbes finally admits he's lying about things.

Recognizing your problem is the first step towards a successful rehabilitation, johnny.

[johnforbes]

What have we learned from this valuable thread?

History does not record whether Corn Pop waged a diversionary attack upon the defenses of the mighty Clowntroller on that fateful day in the parking lot of a swimming pool in Delaware.

What is certain is that Corn Pop was a bad boy.

But Clowntroller back then was in peak condition, and had been in many fights.

Most of Clown's fights were two hit ones -- Clown got hit, and then Clown hit the ground.