Political discussions about everything
#134299
Once again johnforbes posts to prove existing gun laws are inadequate to stop abuse of firearms.

So what further laws will you support, johnny?

Or are you saying we should just accept that level of gun violence from now on because, after all, those shooters have a right to their guns and no one should have their Constitutional rights restricted?

I must say, you continue to puzzle me with your posts about the glaring inadequacy of existing gun laws.
#134302
Yes, johnny, we already talked about how you support the insane Originalist/Thomas interpretation that allows people to conceal carry on airplanes.

When will johnforbes learn that NO right, constitutional or otherwise, is unlimited, and that rational limitations must be applied in the case of guns more than anywhere else since the price of armed nutjobs roaming the country will always result in deaths?

But more to the point, when will he learn that concealed carry on aircraft is not the way a "well regulated Militia" was ever originally intended to fight tyrants, or that a "free state" should not be one where everyone is free to die at the hand of every gun-toting partisan loon upset about his road rage, divorce, bar brawl, sports team loss, or Presidential election loss?

But you are absolutely correct that current gun laws are egregiously ineffective and stronger laws are needed to curtail all this violence.

Elkin's bunker was busted early and often during h[…]

Clowntoker couldn't run a lemonade stand. Clown's[…]

Mr Forbes has never cited AI. In the most charmin[…]

Obliterated what?

As if Trump wasn't using unsecured private email s[…]

Well. A lot of people say a lot of things some tr[…]

I'd like to thank Mr Forbes for posting that

Hulk Hogan

Years ago, at Dulles Intl Airport, I ran into Hulk[…]