[johnforbes]

Is there any current science at all which now supports mask mandates? Anybody? Bueller?

[elklindo69]

Ukrainian Resistance: Hey Russian warship.....go fuck yourself!!!

Anti-mask Resistance: Wahhhhhh....It makes my face itch.

[johnforbes]

So Elkin admits that, even given his marvelous education (GED obtained in Juvenile Hall), he cannot provide any science...

[Clownkicker]

As always, johnforbes misses the unfortunate fact that elklindo provided EXACTLY as much scientific information as johnforbes did.

So that means (if we are to use johnforbes' 'reasoning') dimwit johnny admits that, even given his alleged marvelous education, he cannot provide any science either.

What a surprise...

[johnforbes]

I appreciate Clown's agreement that Elkin provided zero science supporting mask use.

[Clownkicker]

I appreciate johnforbes' agreement that johnforbes has provided zero science supporting his purely partisan propaganda thread.

The trouble is, since johnforbes is the one who started this thread, it is incumbent upon him to first supply some science, any science whatsoever, to support his belief that this is a subject worthy of further discussion. He didn't.

Instead, all he has that makes him believe this topic warrants further discussion is that he listened to his daily dose of propaganda from his handlers telling him that he should pee his pants over this non-issue. So he did.

Why he would then want to drag his dank, smelly pants through this forum as he did is beyond me.

[johnforbes]

Alas, there is no science to support any continuing mask mandates.

Even more sadly, as Fauci pointed out in the first quarter of 2020, there is a lot of evidence suggesting only N95-quality masks did any good, and most mask-wearers touched their hands to their faces about 20 times more, thus making masks ineffective in lessening germs/bacteria/etc

[Clownkicker]

Alas, johnforbes just admitted he has no science to support discontinuing reasonable mask mandates.

[johnforbes]

In Clown's case, we all agree he should wear a mask for esthetic reasons.

But I was talking about science.

[Clownkicker]

Only you weren't talking about science, dimwit. You have yet to provide any science whatsoever here.

So the only thing you are talking about is your usual partisan propaganda.

[johnforbes]

No, i was asking the question which was the focus of the thread.

Let's all go back to read it again, and marvel at its simplicity and clarity.

[Clownkicker]

Dimwit johnny seems oblivious of the fact that all the mask mandates are coming off in a week or two.

Let's all marvel at the irrelevance and stupidity of this thread.

[johnforbes]

Mask mandates are coming off because power-hungry Democrats read that memo saying they would lose in November if they continued their mandates and power trips.

Who "won" in Ottawa, where Trudeau was so poor a leader that he couldn't even meet with his own constituents and hear their concerns, but instead said they carried swastikas.

[Clownkicker]

johnforbes insists there is no scientific evidence that masks curb the spread of respiratory disease.

Yes, he is actually that stupid. And that incompetent using an internet search engine.

Every medical facility in the world uses masks to curb the spread of respiratory disease because it has been proven repeatedly how effective they are.

(Now let's watch the raving lunatic return, hypocritically babbling about how the little alien microbes that are a global(?) Democrat plot to grab power aren't really affected by masks and in fact need to be set free to infect everyone.)

For the technology challenged dimwits here:
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2014564118 (The National Academy of Sciences)
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... -cov2.html
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-con ... t-20485449
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7253999/


"Results

A total of 21 studies met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses suggest that mask use provided a significant protective effect (OR = 0.35 and 95% CI = 0.24–0.51). Use of masks by healthcare workers (HCWs) and non-healthcare workers (Non-HCWs) can reduce the risk of respiratory virus infection by 80% (OR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.11–0.37) and 47% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.36–0.79). The protective effect of wearing masks in Asia (OR = 0.31) appeared to be higher than that of Western countries (OR = 0.45). Masks had a protective effect against influenza viruses (OR = 0.55), SARS (OR = 0.26), and SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 0.04). In the subgroups based on different study designs, protective effects of wearing mask were significant in cluster randomized trials and observational studies.

Conclusions

This study adds additional evidence of the enhanced protective value of masks, we stress that the use of masks serve as an adjunctive method regarding the COVID-19 outbreak."-nih.gov

[johnforbes]

Sorry, some of us are actually following the science.

The mind of Mr Forbes is as clear as a mountain stream, and deeper than Lake Baikal.

There is no current science which supports ongoing mask mandates.

If there were, Dem-controlled areas would not be removing mask mandates.

[Clownkicker]

Wow, johnforbes just let slip where his Dacha is located. Lake Baikal.

I assume that was his reward for promoting propaganda from the Russian government the way he does.


"There is no current science which supports ongoing mask mandates."-johnfibs

I just linked you to four studies showing that's a lie, dimwit. It's called "science".

You know, that thing you never quote from nor post any links to.

But feel free to post a link to any scientific studies showing masks are ineffective, johnny.

[johnforbes]

Alas alack, no.

Once upon a midnight dreary, as I pondered weak and weary, over many a forgotten volume of photographs, I found pictures of the young Mr Forbes who served, inter alia, in support of NATO and thus against Russia.

How many of those so eager for war over Ukraine have done the same?

[Clownkicker]

Who are you talking about, dimwit?

Tell us exactly who you think is "eager for war over Ukraine."

Those Republican morons at AFPAC are the ONLY ones I have heard of cheering on Putin and the war.

You can't produce a single Democrat calling for war in Ukraine. I produced a whole Republican political action committee cheering Putin on.


Now, feel free to post a link to any scientific studies showing masks are ineffective, johnny.

Once again you have conveniently overlooked your responsibility to this discussion.

[johnforbes]

Many in the media have been trembling with moral outrage.

They couldn't care less that America's southern border is wide open, with 1.9 million new illegal aliens crossing in 2021.

But they care -- deeply, passionately -- about Ukraine's border.

Ned Price, first openly gay State Dept spindoctor, is so exercised that he may sip wine in Georgetown this weekend.

Jen Psaki is so upset by Ukraine that she may delay her hair dye appointment and recharge her cell phone.

To be fair, some more Right-leaning folks such as Bongino and Hannity and Graham have also lost perspective on what is in America's national interest (our own borders) and what is not (adventuring in Ukraine),

[Clownkicker]

Yes, johnny, you couldn't produce a single Democrat who is eager for war over Ukraine as you dishonestly claimed. But we already knew you couldn't.

Unlike with many Republicans at AFPAC who are on record supporting Putin.


I take it you still can't post any science to back up the removal of mask mandates. Otherwise you would have posted it by now on this phony 'science' thread where you have not yet said a single word about any science that suggests masks are not effective in limiting the spread of respiratory disease.

But you keep trying to avoid that glaring fact with your war diversions away from the thread topic.

[johnforbes]

They are all eager for war, at least to the extent it serves as a distraction from Joe's disastrous tenure thus far.

Of course, Adam "Shifty" Schiff and characters such as Eric Swallowell would never serve themselves.

[Clownkicker]

So you're saying you couldn't find a single Democrat who is "eager for war" as you lied about previously.

Got it.

Of course, Donald "Shitpile" Trump and characters such as Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene would never serve themselves.

[johnforbes]

The Left is so eager for war that Tik Tok kids are being brought in to tell them Ukraine isn't a corrupt, non-democracy, but a haven of wonderful folks who should be supported.

Sure, Russia invading is bad, but Zelensky is a puppet, quite corrupt, has a 35 million dollar house in Florida, and reputedly a billion dollar offshore account.

To be fair, Clownslacker's numbered bank account in Panama, shielded by three layers of corporate shell, contains the princely sum of $138.14.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, you make yourself look really foolish and gullible when you double down on that unsupported propaganda from your Russian-run website sources.

It's a dishonest and dimwitted move worthy of Trump himself.

(And yes, that's an insult.)

[johnforbes]

My own fact-checkers have swooped in to check the forum fact-checkers.

Below is the utter truth:

The Left is so eager for war that Tik Tok kids are being brought in to tell them Ukraine isn't a corrupt, non-democracy, but a haven of wonderful folks who should be supported.

Sure, Russia invading is bad, but Zelensky is a puppet, quite corrupt, has a 35 million dollar house in Florida, and reputedly a billion dollar offshore account.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, your lies are not "utter truth"

You really need to get a dictionary if you are unable to utilize the internet and learn the definition of words.

Now then, please refrain in the future from posting made up stupid shit from your handlers.

Your Russian disinformation just doesn't fly here. Only sillydummy believes it.

[johnforbes]

When I am particularly upset by some criticism posted by Clowntoker, I merely retreat to my Pond of Serenity and ponder our cosmic destiny:

My trusty staffers sought to upload a photo of this magical place, but the file was too large.

Hopefully, the forum has not impounded my pondering pond photos.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, Lake Baikal where you have your Dacha reward from Putin is not a "Pond"

Honestly, you and your corrupt Russian Newspeak disinformation...

[johnforbes]

Heavens to Betsy, I'm shocked at the level of Clowntoker's disinformation.

I served with NATO units, inter alia, opposing the USSR.

Meanwhile, Clowntoker is in bed ideologically with Putin.

[Clownkicker]

"I served with NATO units, inter alia, opposing the USSR."-johnforbes

And that makes your willing regurgitation of Russian propaganda so much more tragic, if not traitorous.


"Meanwhile, His Lordship is in bed ideologically with Putin."-johnfibs

How dare you accuse me of supporting your anti-American propaganda from social media gossip sites and Russian government-run websites.(That is the very definition of "in bed ideologically with Putin." You regularly regurgitate his propaganda here in support of Putin and against Biden and Ukraine.)

Meanwhile, you are unable to quote me saying anything whatsoever that aligns with Putin in any way.

You and the other AFPAC Republicans are the ones on the record in bed ideologically with Putin.

[johnforbes]

To be fair, Clownslacker does have the courage of his convictions.

When he taps on a keyboard, in a climate-controlled mental asylum, he is a bold warrior in his own demented "mind."

Has Clown ever looked down the bore of a Russian tank cannon on guard duty at 3am?

Of course not.

[Clownkicker]

johnny, just because you were forced to be there at the point of a government gun (since you wouldn't enlist without being coerced with threats of incarceration) doesn't make you morally superior to anyone.

And it doesn't make you one iota braver than anyone else.

Get over your youthful cowardice. It's time to grow up.

Enjoy your Dacha on the lake.

[johnforbes]

Well, there is a fine line between bravery and stupidity.

Like many another young paratrooper, perhaps I put one foot over the line.

Alas, Clownslacker has put one toke over the line far too often.

[Clownkicker]

The problem now is that you still have your foot over that line, supporting Putin by frequently regurgitating propaganda from his government-run websites.

You pretend you can be excused for doing so because you got the information from your Right Wing handlers' websites, who got it from the Russian propaganda machine for you.

Youth is no longer an excuse for such stupidity, dummy.

[johnforbes]

Oh please, not wanting to throw 14 billion down the rathole of corruption in Ukraine while leaving America's southern border wide open is hardly tantamount to being on the side of dictator Putin.

Don't be silly.

[Clownkicker]

No, dimwit, you support Putin by regurgitating Russian state media propaganda to attack Biden and support Putin's illegal war.

Neither Ukraine nor the southern border has anything to do with your traitorous support of Putin.

[johnforbes]

April certainly is a cruel month, breeding lilacs from the death earth.

As I sit huddled in my cardboard box, with a chilly rain falling outside, and with the stock market in smoking ruins, I am shocked that Clowntoker would lodge harsh criticism.

Therefore, I shall weep silently.

After that, I shall log off the Interwebs forever.

[Clownkicker]

Yup, another big fat goose egg nuthin' from johnforbes.

It's what he does every time he's caught shoveling unsupported shit without any science to back him up.

[johnforbes]

It is another chilly, rainy day. April certainly is a cruel month, breeding lilacs from the death earth.

As I sit huddled in my cardboard box, I am shocked that Clowntoker would lodge harsh criticism.

Therefore, I shall weep silently.

After that, I shall log off the Interwebs forever.

[Clownkicker]

Yup, another big fat babbling goose egg from johnforbes.

It's what he does every time he's caught shoveling unsupported shit without any science to back him up.

[johnforbes]

Mr Forbes would respond to that, but he logged off the Interwebs forever.

[Clownkicker]

Yeah, he IS that big of a pussy.

And he has yet to come up with any science whatsoever to contribute to his own thread about science.

More mindless yammering stupidity is all he and his moronic staff ever contribute here.

[johnforbes]

It was snowing today, windy and 40 F.

This chilly April day, breeding lilacs from the death earth, saw Mr. Forbes shocked anew that Clowntoker would lodge harsh criticism.

Fortunately, though, Mr Forbes has logged off the Interwebs forever.